Legislature(1993 - 1994)
04/08/1993 02:05 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATOR TAYLOR returned HB 99 (REPEAL 65-DAY DEADLINE: OIL
SPILL PLANS) and invited the sponsor, REPRESENTATIVE JOE
GREEN, to testify.
Number 398
REPRESENTATIVE GREEN explained, currently, AS 46.04.030(p)
requires the Department of Environmental Conservation to
"...approve or disapprove a proposed contingency plan within
65 days after it receives a complete application ...". He
further explained the time-line necessitated by the 65 day
statutory requirement conflicts with the time-line set out
in the Alaska Coastal Management Plan regulations carried
out by the Division of Governmental Coordination (DGC).
REPRESENTATIVE GREEN said the conflict between the two time-
lines make the progress cumbersome for both the applicant
and members of the public wishing to participate in the
review process. He said the removal of the 65 day statutory
requirement allows the DEC and DGC to coordinate their time
lines for approving contingency plans.
SENATOR LITTLE asked for clarified as to what the provision
actually does. REPRESENTATIVE GREEN said an applicant is
not sure which time-line to follow, and he explained there
were two over-lapping agencies, whose time clocks don't
correspond.
SENATOR LITTLE commented that the DEC time clock starts
first and asked if getting a permit would take longer.
REPRESENTATIVE GREEN explained how the two agencies, which
support the bill, would coordinate their efforts and clean
up the problem.
SENATOR LITTLE asked for any downside to the bill.
Number 437
REPRESENTATIVE GREEN said there was some concern the bill
did not address an interior oil spill contingency plan, and
he explained the DGC would be the responsible agency.
Number 437
SENATOR HALFORD moved to pass HOUSE BILL NO. 99 (REPEAL
65-DAY DEADLINE: OIL SPILL PLANS) from committee with
individual recommendations. Without objections, so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|