Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
03/19/2021 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB115 | |
| HB81 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 98 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE RESOURCES STANDING COMMITTEE
March 19, 2021
1:04 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Josiah Patkotak, Chair
Representative Grier Hopkins, Vice Chair
Representative Zack Fields
Representative Calvin Schrage
Representative Sara Hannan
Representative Mike Cronk
Representative Ronald Gillham
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative George Rauscher
Representative Tom McKay
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
HOUSE BILL NO. 115
"An Act relating to aquatic farming and hatchery site leases;
and requiring the director of the division of lands to provide
the legislature with an annual report relating to aquatic
farming and hatchery site leases."
- HEARD & HELD
HOUSE BILL NO. 81
"An Act authorizing the commissioner of natural resources to
modify a net profit share lease."
- HEARD & HELD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
BILL: HB 115
SHORT TITLE: AQUATIC FARMING & HATCHERY SITE LEASES
SPONSOR(s): REPRESENTATIVE(s) STORY
02/24/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/24/21 (H) FSH, RES
03/04/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
03/04/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/04/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/09/21 (H) FSH AT 11:00 AM GRUENBERG 120
03/09/21 (H) Moved HB 115 Out of Committee
03/09/21 (H) MINUTE(FSH)
03/10/21 (H) FSH RPT 7DP
03/10/21 (H) DP: VANCE, STUTES, STORY, MCCABE,
KREISS-TOMKINS, ORTIZ, TARR
03/19/21 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
BILL: HB 81
SHORT TITLE: OIL/GAS LEASE:DNR MODIFY NET PROFIT SHARE
SPONSOR(s): RULES BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR
02/18/21 (H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
02/18/21 (H) RES, FIN
03/05/21 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
03/05/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/05/21 (H) MINUTE(RES)
03/10/21 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
03/10/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/10/21 (H) MINUTE(RES)
03/17/21 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
03/17/21 (H) Heard & Held
03/17/21 (H) MINUTE(RES)
03/19/21 (H) RES AT 1:00 PM BARNES 124
WITNESS REGISTER
REPRESENTATIVE ANDI STORY
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: As prime sponsor, presented HB 115.
GREG SMITH, Staff
Representative Andi Story
Alaska State Legislature
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: On behalf of prime sponsor Representative
Story, presented the Sectional Analysis on HB 115.
CHRISTY COLLES, Division Operations Manager
Division of Mining Land and Water
Department of Natural Resources
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided information and answered questions
during the hearing on HB 115.
HEATHER MCCARTY, Chair
Mariculture Task Force
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 115.
ERIC WYATT, President
Alaska Shellfish Growers Association
Craig, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Testified in support of HB 115.
RYAN FITZPATRICK, Commercial Analyst
Department of Natural Resources
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided information and answered questions
during the hearing on HB 81.
ACTION NARRATIVE
1:04:21 PM
CHAIR JOSIAH PATKOTAK called the House Resources Standing
Committee meeting to order at 1:04 p.m. Representatives Fields,
Hopkins, Schrage, Hannan, Gilham, Cronk, and Patkotak were
present at the call to order.
HB 115-AQUATIC FARMING & HATCHERY SITE LEASES
1:05:31 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 115 "An Act relating to aquatic farming and
hatchery site leases; and requiring the director of the division
of lands to provide the legislature with an annual report
relating to aquatic farming and hatchery site leases."
1:05:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDI STORY, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, presented the sponsor statement for HB 115, which read
as follows [original punctuation provided]:
House Bill 115 simplifies the Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) lease renewal process for aquatic
farms to support Alaska's aquaculture sector while
reducing administrative overhead. Examples of aquatic
farm products include oysters, kelp, and other
shellfish. HB115 makes the aquatic farm lease renewal
process consistent with the renewal process for other
DNR leases such as agricultural grazing, cabins and
lodges, fish processing docks, and hydroelectric
facilities. HB 115 does not affect salmon hatchery
leases.
If enacted, HB115 would expedite the lease renewal
process lowering the risk for businesses investment
and reducing the workload of an overstretched state
agency.
Current statute requires DNR to approve both initial
and renewal aquatic farm leases using the same
process, called a "945 authorization" (referring to
the adjudication process found in AS 38.05.945), which
takes around 200 days. HB115 would allow aquatic farm
or hatchery renewals to be renewed in the same manner
as most DNR leases like those listed above. This
optional process allows the Director of the Division
of Mining, Land and Water to renew a lease for a
business in good standing and takes around 90 days.
Applied to aquatic businesses, this option
significantly shortens the renewal process while
continuing appropriate regulatory oversight and public
engagement.
HB115 also requires DNR to submit an initial report on
the backlog of pending aquatic farm and hatchery site
lease applications, estimate economic impacts of
pending leases, and provide recommendations for
streamlining the lease approval process. Subsequent
annual reports would detail the application backlog
and list the number of leases renewals that underwent
the time-intensive lease renewal process.
This bill makes clear ecotourism and educational use
of sites is allowed, and explicitly prohibits DNR from
charging additional fees for persons using, or
traversing, land leased for aquatic farms and hatchery
sites.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY noted that this legislation was heard in
the Thirty-First Alaska State Legislature, and while in the
Senate Finance Committee, a few changes had been made which have
been incorporated in HB 115.
1:10:15 PM
GREG SMITH, Staff, Representative Andi Story, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Story, detailed the
Sectional Analysis on HB 115, which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
Section 1: Amends AS 38.05.035(a) to require the
Director of the Division of Mining, Land, and Water to
submit an annual report to the legislature, primarily
detailing aquatic farm and hatchery site leases
pending with the department.
Section 2: Amends AS 38.05.070(e) by adding AS
38.05.083 (aquatic farm leasing statute) to the
general leasing renewal section of law. This change
allows the director to renew an aquatic farm lease
under general lease renewal procedure.
? A technical amendment on lines 20-21 specifies
which types of leases may be renewed under this
procedure.
Section 3: Amends AS 38.050.083(a) by deleting the
term "or renew" from this section of statute. This
removes the requirement that the renewal procedure for
an aquatic farm or hatchery undergo the more detailed
AS 38.05.945 adjudication process.
Section 4: Amends AS 38.050.083(b) by deleting the
term "or renewal" from this section of statute. This
removes the renewal procedure from the aquatic farm
leasing statute.
Section 5: Adds new subsections to AS 38.050.083,
including:
? (g): stating the Commissioner of the Department
of Natural Resources may renew an aquatic farm lease
under the general leasing renewal procedure;
? (h): explicitly states ecotourism and
educational purposes are allowable uses for aquatic
farming and hatchery sites; and
? (i): explicitly prohibits the charging of an
additional fee to aquatic farming and hatchery sites
for the use of, or passage, across these sites.
Section 6: Adds a new section to uncodified law to
require Director of the Division of Mining, Land, and
Water to submit an initial report to the legislature
detailing aquatic farm and hatchery site leases
pending with the department, estimates of economic
impact if all the leases were granted, and
recommendations by DNR and other state agencies to
streamline the lease approval process.
1:13:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS thanked Representative Story for
introducing the bill and noted that he has heard from
acquaintances regarding problems with the 10-year lease renewal.
He asked why the bill is written to implement expedited renewal
processes instead of changing to 25-year leases.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY answered that it would be helpful to hear
from the department staff who would be testifying.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS responded that he would also like to learn
about what happens in the case of something going wrong mid-
lease.
1:14:46 PM
CHRISTY COLLES, Division Operations Manager, Division of Mining
Land and Water, Department of Natural Resources, explained that
currently the regulation is for a 10-year authorization, and any
term longer than 10 years requires a survey for leases, and, in
many cases, the lessees don't want to spend the money for a
survey and appraisal. She said it would be possible to move to
a longer authorization, but the statute affects all of the
leases.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS followed up to ask whether it's feasible
to extend the term of only the leases in question without
harming the other 10-year leases, and to require the survey at a
later date instead of at the beginning of the lease, so that the
lessee can spread out the costs and make more money throughout
the lease term.
MS. COLLES responded that she thinks it is possible. She
explained that the benefit of this proposed legislation is
allowing the farmers to have the certainty of a longer lease
without having to go through the full process of preliminaries,
public notice, and final notice. She noted that lessees have
expressed that they would like the option of having a term of
longer than 10 years.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS said that he would be interested in
introducing an amendment to lengthen the initial lease term to
15 or 20 years, perhaps requiring a survey at year 10. He noted
that these facilities are very capital-intensive and that it's
reasonable to have a longer period to recoup the investment.
1:17:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN said that Alaska has had many mariculture
leases, largely for shellfish, and the further north the area is
the slower the shellfish grow, so it may be years before a farm
has a commercially viable crop. She said that the new growth in
the mariculture industry involves faster-growing crops like
kelp, and that the department found that it couldn't process the
new leases into commercial operation because it felt obligation
to renew the leases of the existing operators; new operators
couldn't enter the segment that's flourishing in the industry.
She said that new operators could potentially conflict with
other leases, in that allowing lease renewals is much easier
than processing new leases.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY noted that when an operator is going
through a lease renewal their application is queued with all the
others, lengthening the process.
1:20:21 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK observed that HB 115 would bring the mariculture
industry to the same level playing field with the rest of the
agricultural industry in Alaska.
1:21:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS said that even in Fairbanks there are
many Alaska-grown mariculture products and that he appreciates
the proposed bill.
1:21:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked whether 10 years is the best
timeframe or if extending the lease term would have more
benefits.
MS. COLLES replied that agricultural leases can go up to 55
years, but aquatic farms are at 10 years based on regulations in
place. She said that regulations can be changed, and if the
department could find a statutory change that would allow
consideration of a longer-term lease, they might allow a lease
term beyond 10 years.
1:23:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM followed up on Representative Fields'
question and said that by the time an oyster crop is grown and
ready for market it could be 8 to 10 years, then they would need
to start all over. He said that for seaweed a 10-year lease is
appropriate, but for shellfish, it's too short.
1:24:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS said that he had heard, anecdotally, that
growing seaweed and oysters side-by-side benefits water quality,
and asked why that wouldn't be wanted.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY said that she would defer to the department
for that question.
MS. COLLES responded that the question would be appropriately
directed to the Department of Fish and Game, but that she is of
the same understanding as Representative Fields.
1:25:57 PM
HEATHER MCCARTY, Chair, Mariculture Task Force, testified in
support of HB 115. She gave a brief overview of the purpose of
the Mariculture Task Force, noting that it was created in 2016
to represent several entities with interest in mariculture
development; one of the task force's first tasks was to identify
priorities which would move mariculture development forward.
She said that the task force focused on identifying regulatory
areas which needed to be addressed; the Department of Natural
Resources' (DNR's) lease process is one area which needed
improvement. She said that she believes there was a two-year
backlog of requests, which has gotten better; the issue
addressed in this bill was also identified by the task force.
She said that the renewal process doesn't need to take as long
as the initial lease. She then said, regarding the ecotourism
sites, that allowing that activity would significantly benefit
those operators.
1:29:36 PM
ERIC WYATT, President, Alaska Shellfish Growers Association,
testified in support of HB 115. He identified himself as an
active farmer of more than 10 years and said that it's very
encouraging to hear the comments that are supportive of
mariculture. He said that he likes simple solutions to move the
industry forward, and that the Alaska Shellfish Growers
Association approves of this proposed bill, and he personally
approves of it as well. He emphasized his approval of the
ecotourism portion of HB 115.
1:31:34 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK opened public testimony on HB 115. After
ascertaining that no one wished to testify, he closed public
testimony.
1:32:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY remarked that she believes HB 115 would
have great potential for helping businesses and that she
appreciates the support of the testifiers.
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM asked for a definition of maritourism or
aquatourism.
MR. SMITH answered that maritourism is commonly the practice of
people visiting the shellfish farm, seeing the floats or docks,
tasting the products, and learning about the process.
REPRESENTATIVE GILLHAM described his experience visiting an
oyster farm in Prince William Sound, and he expressed his
appreciation of HB 115.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN described her appreciation for
mariculture, and she noted that there is a growing segment of
travelers that want to be educated instead of just purchasing
the product.
1:36:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS related a personal experience of
ecotourism.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK noted that he supports the proposed bill
and stated his support for helping private businesses.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY agreed that supporting this industry is
important and thanked committee members for their comments.
1:38:09 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK announced that HB 115 was held over.
HB 81-OIL/GAS LEASE: DNR MODIFY NET PROFIT SHARE
1:38:50 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 81 "An Act authorizing the commissioner of
natural resources to modify a net profit share lease."
[Before the committee was the proposed committee substitute (CS)
for HB 81, Version 32-GH1706\B, Nauman, 3/16/21, ("Version B"),
adopted as a working document during the House Resources
Standing Committee meeting on 3/17/21, with Amendment 1 tabled
and Amendment 2 left pending with an objection.]
CHAIR PATKOTAK briefly addressed the amendments that the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) worked on and invited
Representative Hannan to speak about her amendment.
1:39:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN described Amendment 2, which read as
follows:
Page 2, line 18, following "feasible;":
Insert "a royalty modification may not be made
under this subparagraph;"
Page 2, line 30:
Delete "or (1)(D)"
Page 4, line 5:
Delete "or net profit share"
Following "(1)(A)":
Insert "of this subsection or a net profit share
reduction under (1)(A)"
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN reviewed that Amendment 2 was about
encouraging production and said that she believes it should be
limited to affecting only the 26 net profit sharing leases
(NPSLs) instead of opening it to the thousands of leases that
have royalties, because every lease has a royalty component.
She said that the committee has learned that operators with
royalty-only leases have other ways of renegotiating the royalty
amount, but this bill was designed to get non-productive NPSLs
into production. She said that the NPSLs could use the various
avenues available in existing statute to evaluate renegotiation.
She also noted that legislative oversight is required to change
a lease agreement, and the Legislative Finance Division is most
likely not prepared to provide oversight for thousands of
royalty leases; however, oversight of 26 NPSLs is possible. She
ended by summarizing that she supports changes that encourage
NPSLs into production, but doesn't want to create a broad change
that would allow thousands of royalty lease renegotiations in a
given timeframe.
1:42:10 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK invited Ryan Fitzpatrick to clarify any
actionable changes that would be made by the Amendment 2.
1:42:38 PM
RYAN FITZPATRICK, Commercial Analyst, Department of Natural
Resources, referred to the document "Changes in CS HB 81 Version
I" [Version I was not moved for adoption until 3/22/21], which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Page 2 Lines 16 19
- Clarifies language in subsection D regarding
circumstances in which capital expenditures are needed
to extend the economic life of an oil or gas field or
pool
- Specifies that subsection D only applies to net
profit share lease modifications
MR. FITZPATRICK explained that Amendment 2 would restrict the
scenario to the 26 NPSLs and modify only the net profit share
component of the 26 leases, not necessarily the royalty
component. He said that he believes that, from the perspective
of DNR, the issue with modifying only the net profit share
component is that it sufficiently incentivizes the lessee to
make the capital expenditures necessary to get the lease
productive again. He said that if it was possible to modify
royalty in addition to net profit share, then the leaseholder
might be sufficiently incentivized to make capital expenditures,
thereby extending the life of the field or pool.
1:45:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS stated that he supports Amendment 2
because of the title of the bill, which specifies "to modify a
net profit share lease." He noted that the presentations have
involved the 26 NPSLs, but they've had no presentations or
opportunities to learn about the royalty-only leases. If the
committee wants to address royalty modifications for the
previously described "scenario D," he said, there should be
another bill up for discussion. He opined that Amendment 2 is
"absolutely critical" to limit the bill to the information
already received, the title, and the intent of the bill.
1:47:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS stated that he supports HB 81 as it
pertains to the NPSLs but not with impacts on royalties. He
said that he supports Amendment 2 and cannot support the
underlying bill without it or his "subsequent amendment to an
amendment to make sure we are appropriately encouraging
production and capital investment." He noted Representative
Hopkins' comments regarding the text of the bill being
consistent with the title.
1:48:24 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK invited Mr. Fitzpatrick or Mr. Meza to provide
any further comments before the committee votes.
MR. FITZPATRICK said that making a change in policy is the
prerogative of the legislature, and noted that in the PowerPoint
presentation (given by Mr. Meza during the House Resources
Standing Committee meeting on March 5, 2021, and included in the
committee packet), slides 21 and 23 were intended to convey that
the newly proposed "scenario D" under HB 81 was to apply to both
royalty modification and NPSL modification situations.
1:49:46 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK asked for clarification on Amendment 2 with
reference to the PowerPoint presentation, titled "HB 81 - DNR
MODIFYING NET PROFIT SHARES ON OIL & GAS LEASES," and whether it
would limit the authority of the DNR commissioner as outlined in
item 1A on slide 21 of the PowerPoint presentation, which read
as follows [original punctuation provided]:
1. Expand the royalty modification process to include
NPSLs:
A. Commissioner would have the authority to
modify net profit share rates in the same manner as
royalty rates under AS 38.05.180(j).
? Objective is to encourage production of
otherwise stranded resources.
MR. FITZPATRICK answered that he believes Amendment 2 would not
impact that provision, but it would impact other proposed
changes, as shown in item 2A on slide 21 of the PowerPoint
presentation, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
2. Other changes:
A. Creates an additional qualifying scenario for
modification of either royalty or NPSLs
? For producing pools, where incremental
production requires incremental capital expenditures,
which, in the absence of modification, would be
uneconomic.
MR. FITZPATRICK explained that the intent of DNR was for the
modification allowance to apply to both royalty and NPSLs.
1:51:46 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK noted that Representative Rauscher had brought
forth the original objection to Amendment 2 [on 3/17/21], for
discussion purposes, but that Representative Rauscher's office
approved of lifting his objection in his absence. There being
no further objection, Amendment 2 was adopted.
1:52:23 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK referred to the amendment from Representative
Fields, and he and Representative Fields briefly discussed which
amendments are about to be put forth.
1:53:12 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease.
1:53:25 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK reminded committee members that on 3/17/21, the
committee had tabled Amendment 1. He announced that Amendment 1
was before the committee. Amendment 1 read as follows:
Page 2, lines 17 - 18:
Delete "for which additional capital expenditures
would make future production no longer"
Insert "from which, without additional capital
expenditures, future production would no longer be"
1:53:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS moved to adopt Amendment 1 to Amendment 1,
labeled 32-GH1706\B.3, Nauman, 3/18/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, lines 17 - 18:
Delete "for which additional capital expenditures
would make future production no longer"
Insert "from which, without additional capital
expenditures, future production would no longer be"
Page 3, following line 9:
Insert a new paragraph to read:
"(6) may not grant a royalty or net profit
share modification for a field or pool under (1)(D) of
this subsection unless
(A) the modification requires the lessee or
lessees to make the capital expenditures necessary for
production to be economically feasible; and
(B) the commissioner determines that the
capital expenditures made under (A) of this paragraph
are sufficient to maximize production from the field
or pool;"
Page 3, line 10:
Delete "(6)"
Insert "(7)"
Page 3, line 16:
Delete "(7)"
Insert "(8)"
Page 4, line 3:
Delete "(8)"
Insert "(9)"
Page 4, line 28:
Delete "(9)"
Insert "(10)"
Page 5, line 2:
Delete "(10)"
Insert "(11)"
Page 5, line 4:
Delete "(9)"
Insert "(10)"
Page 5, line 9:
Delete "(11)"
Insert "(12)"
Page 5, line 16:
Delete "(12)"
Insert "(13)"
Page 5, line 17:
Delete "(9)"
Insert "(10)"
Page 5, line 29:
Delete "(9)"
Insert "(10)"
Page 5, line 31:
Delete "(13)"
Insert "(14)"
1:53:56 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK objected for discussion purposes.
1:54:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS thanked the collaborators for their
assistance and described Amendment 1 to Amendment 1, which would
ensure maximum production from the fields by ensuring that
capital investments are made to prolong the lives of the fields.
He said that if either capital investment or modified lease
terms could extend the life of the field, then the capital
investment should happen either before, or in conjunction with,
modified lease terms, so that modified terms don't occur at the
expense of capital investment.
1:54:56 PM
MR. FITZPATRICK explained that this amendment would specify that
if capital expenditures are necessary to extend the life of the
field or pool and reduced lease terms are also allowed, then
there would be a condition on the modification of the lease
terms so that the capital expenditures must be made or else the
modification would be rescinded. He described a specific case
in which capital expenditures were not made, therefore the
royalty modification lapsed, and he indicated that he believes
DNR would support this amendment.
1:57:40 PM
CHAIR PATKOTAK removed his objection. There being no further
objection, Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 was adopted. He then
spoke to Amendment 1, as amended, and addressed Representative
Hopkins' earlier objection to Amendment 1.
1:58:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS withdrew his objection to Amendment 1,
[as amended]. There being no further objection, Amendment 1, as
amended, was adopted.
1:58:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS indicated his thanks to DNR for helping
bring this proposed legislation forward and expressed that he
still has some concerns about the bill, but that he would like
it to continue going forward in order to maximize production.
He said that he wants to ensure that HB 81, as amended, wouldn't
"make profitable production more profitable," but rather would
bring fields that wouldn't otherwise be developed into
production.
[HB 81 was held over.]
2:02:51 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Resources Standing Committee meeting was adjourned at 2:03 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 115 Letter of Support JEDC 3.17.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 ver W Sectional Analysis 02.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Seagrove letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 MTF Letter of Support 03.01.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Marble Seafoods Hump Island letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Global Seas letter of support 03.02.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 AFDF Letter of Support 03.01.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Southeast Conference Letter of Support 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Sponsor Statement 02.24.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Letter of Support - Simpson Bay Oyster Company 3.3.21.pdf |
HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 81 Amendment Technical 3.17.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Amendment Hannan 3.17.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Proposed HRES CS 32-GH1706 Version B 3.17.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Support DNR NPSL One Pager 3.5.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Sponsor Statement 1.28.21.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Sectional Analysis Version A 2.23.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Presentation to HRES 3.5.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/5/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Letter of Support Alaska Oil and Gas Association 3.9.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/10/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/17/2021 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Amendment 1 to Amendment 1 Fields 3.19.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 115 Letter of Support Salt Lady Seafood 3.19.2021.pdf |
HRES 3/19/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 115 |