Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
02/17/2009 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB98 | |
| HB3 | |
| HB20 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 98 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 98
"An Act relating to minor consuming and repeat minor
consuming; and providing for an effective date."
JANE PIERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JAY RAMRAS, presented
the sponsor statement explaining three fixes in the bill.
HB 98 fixes a problem that occurred with the enactment
of HB 359, a bill that passed the House unanimously in
the 25th Legislative Session. HB 359 originated due to
the desire of Alaskan youths to join the military and
not being able to due to probation restrictions from a
minor consuming charge that may have occurred 5 years
previously. Unfortunately, when the bill was drafted,
it left a loop-hole in the repeat minor consuming law.
HB 98 fixes this loop-hole by amending the language of
AS 04.16.050(c) to include in the list of predicate
offenses for repeat minor consuming "previously granted
suspended imposition of sentence", and "a prior
conviction under AS 04.16.050 (b)(2)."
This new language will now cover all repeat offenders,
no matter how their previous minor consuming charges
were adjudicated.
Co-Chair Stoltze requested a summary of the ultimate goal in
passing House Bill 98. Ms. Pierson referred to HB 359 that
states a minor convicted of minor consuming could be taken
off probation in order to join the military, play sports, or
cross into Canada, so their lives would not be placed on
hold because of a mistake. House Bill 98 is a technical fix
to that bill.
Representative Gara questioned what would happen if this
bill passed. He wondered if it was correct that a young
person, with a first time arrest for having a beer, the law
now states they are convicted. Ms. Pierson stated that the
minor may be convicted two ways; first under AS 04.16.050
(b)(1) which grants a suspension of sentence and places the
minor on probation or AS 04.16.050 (b)(2) which imposes a
fine of at least $200 but not more than $600, requires the
minor to attend alcohol information school or be on
probation for up to one year. It further states that the
court may suspend a portion of the fine if the minor is
required to pay for education or treatment.
Representative Gara reminded the committee that when this
bill came before them last year some members wanted to fix
the law, but were met with resistance. He contended that he
disliked the "convicted" language for a 17 year old caught
having a beer. He judged this offense could be settled with
a fine or require education but not use "conviction"
language.
1:45:43 PM
Ms. Pierson replied that under AS 94.16.050 (1) (3) the
statute states that previously convicted to exclude a
conviction for minor consuming, therefore there is some
leeway. Representative Gara emphasized he did not want this
person treated as a criminal and reiterated it should not be
considered a crime. Ms. Pierson replied it would be a crime.
Representative Gara believed the bill needed further
examination.
1:46:50 PM
Representative Austerman expressed the same concern as
Representative Gara. He believed more time was needed to
investigate this bill. Co-Chair Stoltze expressed there had
been intent to pass the bill, but he believed if there were
still questions, the bill needed further examination.
QUINLAN STEINER, DIRECTOR, PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY,
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, testified via teleconference,
and affirmed the department would look into the questions
expressed by Representative Gara and Representative
Austerman. Representative Gara contended the statute is
strange in that it is only statute on the books that talks
about probation and a suspended imposition of sentence for
something that does not receive a jail sentence.
1:49:36 PM
ANNE CARPENETI, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, LEGAL SERVICES
SECTION-JUNEAU, CRIMINAL DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LAW agreed
that a minor consuming is not a crime for the first and
second time but the word "crime" is used because it is not
clear what else to call it. In 2001 the law was changed for
minor consuming in the state to recognize that minors try
things and should not be tagged with a crime but at present
there is no other label to assign to this offense. Co-Chair
Stoltze asked if this was a semantic issue, calling it a
crime for lack of a better definition. Ms. Carpeneti agreed
it should not be a crime, but crime-related language is
used. Co-Chair Stoltze asked if Ms. Pierson's testimony was
in error. Ms. Carpeneti asserted that the first and second
offenses are not crimes but the third would be a Class B
misdemeanor. Representative Gara asked if language could be
inserted into the statute that said the first two offenses
are not considered crimes. Ms. Carpeneti expressed the need
to look at the statute more carefully before making any
final decisions.
1:51:48 PM
Representative Gara asked if this was the only statute that
had probation and suspended imposition of sentences where
there is no possible jail time. Ms. Carpeneti believed that
was true, but needed to investigate further.
1:52:16 PM
Representative Austerman reiterated he was not trying to
protect the habitual drinker, but he also did not want to
penalize a minor for trying something for the first time.
Representative Joule wondered if citations, something less
than crimes, could be used in this case. Ms. Carpeneti
explained that a citation is a charging or ticketing
document and caution would be needed in using that word, but
it could be considered. Chair Stoltze interjected that this
discussion would depart from Representative Ramras's intent
from a technical fix to a substantive change to an exiting
statute. He would want all interested parties to have a say
before making such a change.
HB 98 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
1:55:02 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| AkConsvAllianceHB20Support.PDF |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| Amendment 2 Gara.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| AS 04.16.050.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 98 |
| Anchorage Muni Resolution.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| DMV Procedures.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Articles.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Sectional Summary.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| CSHB20-FSH--SponsorStatementAndSectional.doc |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| CSHB20 (FSH) SWAMC Support.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| Explanation of Version Changes.doc |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| Commercial Fishing Loan Fund Summary.PDF |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| Amendment 3 Gara.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB20--RTennysonSupportMssg.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB20-FJohnsonSupport.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB20-RDC Support.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB20GlenGardnerSupport.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB20HarringtonSupportMssg.PDF |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB20SEAKFSHAllianceSupport.PDF |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB20UFASupport.PDF |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB3 Stoltz amendment.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| Immigration_Numbers_Alaska_Justice_Forum.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
|
| New HB98 Fiscal Note DPS .pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 98 |
| PSPA Support for HB20.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| SeaGrantFuelSurvey--HB20.pdf.PDF |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| Michigan_Stops_issuing_licenses_illegals.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 98 |
| Sponsor_Statement.doc |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| Support Letter Brakel.doc |
HFIN 2/17/2009 1:30:00 PM |
HB 20 |