Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/31/2023 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Real Estate Commission | |
| HB119 | |
| HB17 | |
| HB92 | |
| HB93 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 92 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 119 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 17 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 93 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 92-FISHERMEN'S FUND: VESSEL OWNER CLAIMS
4:07:23 PM
CHAIR SUMNER announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 92, "An Act relating to claims against protection
and indemnity insurance policies of vessel owners." [Before the
committee, adopted as a working document on 3/14/23, was the
proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 92, Version 33-
LS0520\B, Marx, 3/9/23 ("Version B").]
4:07:57 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:07 p.m. to 4:08 p.m.
4:08:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SARAH VANCE, Alaska State Legislature, on behalf
of the sponsor, the House Special Committee on Fisheries,
presented CSHB 92, Version B, and gave a PowerPoint
presentation, titled, "HB 92 Fishermen's Fund: Vessel Owner
Claims" [hard copy included in the committee packet]. She
stated that the proposed legislation is at the request of the
Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and it would
increase the vessel owner deductible reimbursement to up to
$15,000. She added that the proposed legislation would allow
both the vessel owners and the crew members to receive the same
reimbursement, as seen on slide 2. She stated that there would
also be potential cost savings, as premiums could be less, and
it could protect against loss from medical and legal claims.
Moving to slide 3, she noted that the bill regards the
Fishermen's Fund, and she gave a summary of the fund. She
reiterated that the proposed legislation would create equity
between vessel owners and crew, which does not currently exist.
She discussed the liabilities with the current protection and
indemnity insurance structure on vessels.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE stated that the department was requested to
examine the fund concerning the effects of increasing the
reimbursement to $15,000. On slide 4, she pointed out the
effect of the proposed legislation's worst-case scenario on the
Fishermen's Fund, and she pointed out the best-case scenario on
slide 5. She added that the best-case scenario had used a nine-
year average. She suggested in the best-case scenario the fund
would be kept stable with small increases over time, and she
expressed the understanding that the fund managers have agreed
that this would keep the fund healthy over time.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE, moving to slide 6, reiterated that the
proposed legislation would establish equity between crew members
and vessel owners. She maintained that the bill would utilize
the fund for what it was intended to do, which is to help
commercial fisherman.
4:12:44 PM
VELMA THOMAS, Administrator, Fishermen's Fund Advisory and
Appeals Council, Division of Workers' Compensation, Department
of Labor and Workforce Development, addressed Version B. She
stated that the proposed legislation is based on a resolution
from the Fishermen's Fund Council, with these council members
representing all regions of the state. She stated that the
council members are available for questions pertaining to the
bill.
4:13:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK pointed out the lack of a fiscal note and
questioned the impact on the fund over time.
4:14:04 PM
CHARLES COLLINS, Director, Division of Workers' Compensation,
Department of Labor and Workforce Development, responded that
the chart presented in the PowerPoint presentation addresses the
impact on the fund over time. He explained that this depicts
going backwards nine years, looking at all the claims. He
continued that 80 percent of the claims turned in were less than
$2,500 each, with 20 percent of these rising to the maximum
benefit, either $5,000 for crew or $10,000 for the vessel owner.
He stated that this was used for the projection, with the
revenue from permit and licensing fees staying static. He
deduced that the fund would still stay at $8 billion with this
conservative view. He pointed out that the fund predates
statehood, and the job of the council is to oversee this.
REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK, with a follow-up question, asked about
other current utilizations of the fund.
MR. COLLINS responded that statute allows money from the fund to
be allocated by the legislature for fisher safety programs;
however, he expressed the understanding that this has never been
done. He added that this would be the only other use of the
fund. He stated that the fund represents a user group funding
themselves, allowing the state to monitor the fairness of this.
4:17:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE questioned whether the fund operates
the same as workers' compensation. In other words, if a fisher
is injured, he questioned whether the payment at a medical
facility would be required up front.
MR. COLLINS clarified that commercial fishermen do not qualify
for workers' compensation. He stated that the Fishermen's Fund
is placed under the Division of Workers' Compensation because it
is a similar program, but the funds are not comingled.
MS. THOMAS, addressing how claims work, explained that injured
fishers' remedies are limited; either they can file a claim for
benefits to receive help from the fund or they can seek medical
assistance through the federal Jones Act for medical benefits
and lost wages. She stated that the Fishermen's Fund only pays
for medical benefits and not for lost wages. She continued that
a claim must be filed to receive these benefits. She explained
that there are two types of benefits, one for the injured fisher
and one for the vessel owner. She continued that if the vessel
owner has insurance in place to cover crew members, this can be
reimbursed.
4:20:09 PM
CHAIR SUMNER questioned whether the Fishermen's Fund is a
designated fund.
MS. THOMAS stated that as the fund administrator, she expressed
the understanding that the fund has always been a designated
fund. In response to a follow-up question, she stated that in
2018 an adjustment was made on the vessel owner portion. She
continued that in 2010 an adjustment was made by increasing the
injured-worker benefit portion. She added that from this there
was expectation of an increase in expenses, but this did not
happen. She explained that the reason for this could be
attributed to the federal Affordable Care Act; if an individual
has other insurance the fund becomes a secondary payer. She
suggested that most medical providers in the state know about
the fund and have the claim packets available, and they will
assist the fishers. She stated that as long as the medical
bills are received by the department and the criteria is met,
payments will be made right away. If an individual receives
treatment and uses personal insurance, the fund can help with
expenses on the out-of-pocket portions. She expressed the
opinion that individuals with personal insurance have helped
with the health of the fund over the last few years, as the fund
has only had to pay 20 percent of these medical costs.
4:23:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX questioned whether a fiscal note would
affect the fund.
MR. COLLINS responded that the department has issued a zero
fiscal note because there would be no cost to the budget. In
response to a follow-up question concerning whether agreement on
the terms was across the board, he stated that the fishing
associates, such as the United Fishermen of Alaska, wanted to
move the amount to $10,000; however, the House Special Committee
on the Fishery's went to $15,000 because this would incentivize
the industry. He reiterated that if the vessel owner has other
insurance, and there is a claim against the vessel, the fund can
be applied to this deductible. He stated that the industry has
concerns over the increasing costs and deductibles of the
protection and indemnity insurance; however, he expressed the
opinion that the fund is still healthy enough to cover this. He
referenced the success of the Fishermen's Fund and stated that
the council works diligently to keep it this way.
4:26:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE questioned the specificity of
addressing "heart attacks" in the proposed legislation. He
suggested that this is because of the remoteness of some of the
fishing grounds and the cost of transporting the individuals.
MS. THOMAS answered that over the last five years there have
been only two heart attack claims. She added that some claims
do not meet the qualifying criteria. She stated that a valid
fishing license would need to be presented, and for some claims
this has not been presented. She expressed the opinion that
this being in the proposed legislation would not have a
significant effect on expenses.
MR. COLLINS added that there is no change in the language of the
bill other than the $15,000, as the heart attack language has
been there since around 1977.
4:28:46 PM
CHAIR SUMNER announced that CSHB 92, Version B, was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1.23 Cheryl Markwood Real Estate Resume.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
|
| 3.1.23 Jennifer Mcconnel Labor Relations.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
|
| 3.1.23 Ely Cyrus MCB.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
|
| HB 92 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 92 |
| HB 92 - v.B.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 92 |
| HB 92 - Fishermen's Fund Presentation.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 92 |
| HB 92 - Fishermens Fund Resoultion 22-01.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 92 |
| HB 92 - Fisherman's Fund Report of Vessel-Site Insurance Form.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 92 |
| HB 119 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 119 |
| HB 119 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 119 |
| HB0092 Fiscal Note.PDF |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 92 |
| Phleps_HB119_HLAC_042323.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 119 |
| Peace Frog Botanicals Support for HB119.pdf |
HL&C 3/31/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 119 |