Legislature(2005 - 2006)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/11/2005 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB123 | |
| HB71 | |
| HB219 | |
| HB91 | |
| HB109 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 109 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 91 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 219 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | HB 123 | ||
HOUSE BILL NO. 91
"An Act relating to indecent exposure."
Representative Coghill, sponsor, explained that the bill was
a result of an indecent exposure incident where the criminal
was charged with a misdemeanor. HB 91 states that if there
is a second exposure conviction, the crime moves up to a
Class C felony.
Representative Weyhrauch asked if the bill involves exposure
and masturbation. Representative Coghill responded that
pending testimony would help clarify that question. He
explained that if there is a previous conviction of indecent
exposure, a second instance would be a felony.
Representative Weyhrauch asked for more information about a
second incident. Representative Coghill explained the
elements of purposeful, and knowingly committing the crime.
Representative Croft asked if it applies to minors only.
Representative Coghill replied that it does.
3:48:24 PM
DEBBIE JOSLIN, EAGLE RIVER, (via teleconference) spoke of an
exposure incident in Delta Junction involving her two
daughters, ages 2 and 7. Because masturbation was not
involved, the man was charged with a misdemeanor. He had a
history of exposure to children. She termed it a gateway
crime to abuse of children. The bill applies to second-time
incidents with minors under 16.
3:53:36 PM
Representative Croft spoke of his own two children and fears
of something happening to them. He noted that Section 1
clearly talks about exposure in front of a minor. Section 2
needs language added such as "exposure or conduct described
above in front of a minor". Representative Coghill said
that was also his concern. He noted that reckless disregard
would have to be proven. He stated an intention that it say
"for those under 16".
Representative Croft noted he would contact legislative
legal about this issue.
Representative Weyhrauch noted that the prosecution of this
crime would be determined by the child's perceptions and
testimony. He question how innocent behavior could be
safeguarded. Representative Coghill said that's why he went
to AS 11.41.460 to include "knowingly, purposeful act", and
AS 11.41.458, which addresses masturbation.
Representative Kelly asked if the exposer would be listed as
a sex offender. Representative Coghill said yes.
4:01:00 PM
Vice-Chair Stoltze MOVED to report HB 91 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
impact notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 91 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with three zero fiscal impact notes: #1
ADM, #2 LAW, and #3 CRT.
4:02:19 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|