Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/11/2014 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB89 | |
| SB137 | |
| SB74 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 74 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 316 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 137 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 89
"An Act relating to the rapid response to, and control
of, aquatic invasive species and establishing the
aquatic invasive species response fund."
8:34:36 AM
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 89, Work Draft 28-LS0339\P (Bullard,
4/9/14).
Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
DANIEL GEORGE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE BILL STOLTZE,
explained the changes in the CS. He relayed that on Page 2,
lines 26 and 27, the words "shall provide reasonable notice
to affected property owners" had been added to the bill for
the sake of clarity. He furthered that on Page 3, lines 5
and 6, "aquatic evasive species" had been specified to mean
Northern Pike, didemnum tunicate, European green crab,
spartina, crayfish, or another organism introduced to a
marine or freshwater ecosystem to which it is not native
and whose introduction causes, or is likely to cause,
economic or environmental harm or harm to human health.
8:37:01 AM
CHARLIE SWANTON, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SPORT FISH,
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, testified that the department
was supportive of the changes.
Representative Guttenberg wondered if there was any
location in the state where Northern Pike was native.
Mr. Swanton replied by and large was a general description
on the north side of the Alaska Range.
Representative Guttenberg asked for verification that the
department would not be going after Northern Pike in its
natural habitat. Mr. Swanton replied in the affirmative.
Representative Costello asked if Elodea was considered an
aquatic invasive species under the bill. Mr. Swanton
answered in the affirmative.
Co-Chair Austerman noted that in the past moving the
Geoduck from Southeast Alaska to Kachemak Bay had been
considered by the department as moving an invasive species
and legislation had been required to overcome that label.
He asked if "or another organism" could refer to a similar
situation.
Mr. Swanton answered that the species listed in the CS were
believed by a broad array of people as posing the greatest
risk. He said that the language was not all encompassing.
8:40:08 AM
Co-Chair Austerman hesitated to include the language "or
another organism" in the bill.
Representative Gara took issue with the language pertaining
to economic and environmental harm.
Representative Gara asked whether the invasive species
listed in the original bill had been included in the CS.
Mr. Swanton replied in the affirmative.
Representative Gara wondered if the method of removal of
the species could include non-chemical means.
BEN MULLIGAN, SPECIAL ASSISTANT, DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND
GAME, pointed to page 2, line 21:
In responding under (b) of this section to the
occurrence of freshwater aquatic invasive species, the
department shall respond in a manner determined to
cause the least harm to noninvasive fish populations
that are used for recreational, personal use,
commercial, or subsistence purposes
Mr. Mulligan elaborated that the department would chose an
option that would get rid of the invasive species and cause
the least harm to resident populations.
Vice-Chair Neuman wondered if the bill would look at the
issue of species interfering with the migration patterns of
salmon.
Mr. Swanton replied that it did not speak directly to the
issue. He assured the committee that the department would
pay attention to the issue of range extensions, which were
typical after long periods of geological time.
Vice-Chair Neuman spoke of the pike eradication of
Alexander Creek. He asked whether the bill would expand
similar operations in the northern district where pike
seemed to be expanding further into salmon tributaries.
Mr. Swanton replied that he was unsure whether the
legislation would expand the operation. He said that the
department planned to move forward with a variety of
projects to control of eradicate pike.
8:47:19 AM
Representative Gara wondered whether the department would
opt for non-action if the balance favored non-action.
Mr. Swanton answered that non-action would be on the table
in terms of evaluation before any aggressive action was
taken.
Co-Chair Stoltze WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony.
8:49:24 AM
AT EASE
8:54:08 AM
RECONVENED
HB 89 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 74 - Back up Documents.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| SB 74 - Dedicated Fund Question Legal Memo.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| SB 74 - Full Text.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| SB 74 - University Response to Questions from 4.4.13.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| SB 74-Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| Sectional Analysis for SB 74.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 74 |
| SB 137 Annual Report 2013.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 137 |
| SB 137 ASHSC Strategic Plan.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 137 |
| SB 137 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 137 |
| SB 137 Supp Letter RobertScher.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 137 |
| SB 137 Written Testimony John Aho.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 137 |
| SB 137 Leg Audit Report.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
SB 137 |
| HB 89 CS WORKDRAFT FIN P version.pdf |
HFIN 4/11/2014 8:30:00 AM |
HB 89 |