Legislature(2011 - 2012)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/12/2011 08:30 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR4 | |
| SB102 | |
| HB183 | |
| HB89 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 102 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 183 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 103 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HJR 4 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 89
"An Act authorizing the commissioner of natural
resources to offer bedload material for disposal for
flood control purposes in exchange for a percentage of
the profit from the sale of that material."
10:12:02 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PAUL SEATON, SPONSOR, explained the
legislation. He related that the legislation authorized an
alternative sale mechanism for certain gravel, sand, and
rock associated with flood plain problems or disasters. The
alternative sale must proceed in conjunction with a flood
mitigation plan. He pointed out that the most persistent
problem was the outflow of river gravel and sediments that
built up in streambeds and caused overflow. The overflow
tended to accumulate and rechanneled the river. The water
travelled through people's properties causing damage. He
expounded that current law required bedload material to
sell at fair market value. The legislation allowed the
commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
to consider mitigation of state disaster expenses as part
of the fair market value. The percent of profit calculation
was set at a minimum of 12.5 percent. The material was not
a good quality gravel source and not as desirable on the
commercial market. The bill incentivized removal for
commercial operators; and enabled the export of the gravel
from the problem area. The gravel extractor was required to
have an extraction plan certified by a professional
engineer.
10:16:10 AM
Representative Seaton furthered that the Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT) and DNR would
review the plan for approval. The review would ensure safe
material extraction. The idea of the legislation was to
reduce a hazard by encouraging safe elimination of sediment
buildup. He recapped that the bill allowed an alternative
mechanism for valuing extracted gravel. The state will
still receive value for the bedload material but may
consider the value removal offered for disaster mitigation.
Co-Chair Thomas supported the legislation. He favored
allowing a private entity to remove the gravel instead of
the state. He discussed his experience with gravel and
river shifting. He asked whether salmon streams were
protected. Representative Seaton assured that the
legislation would not preclude any Department of Fish and
Game (DFG) or DEC processes and permitting.
Representative Neuman inquired about the destruction of
spawning beds. He wanted assurance that the involved
agencies supported the legislation. Representative Seaton
repeated that all permits would remain in place under the
legislation. He noted that the state was currently
authorized to sell bedload material. The sale based on a
gross up-front per yard fee was cost prohibitive for
commercial operators. The bill allowed the alternative sale
of bedload material at 12.5 percent of the profit.
10:20:29 AM
Vice-chair Fairclough OPENED public testimony.
Representative Gara queried whether the bill would reduce
any standards that were required to protect habitat in a
fish stream.
MARTY PARSONS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF MINING, LAND
AND WATER, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (via
teleconference),responded in the negative. He reassured the
committee that the legislation does not reduce any DFG
requirements.
LARRY DEVILBISS, MAYOR, MAT-SU BOROUGH, voiced that the
borough supported the legislation. He believed the
legislation would help mitigate the borough's flood
problems.
Vice-chair Fairclough CLOSED public testimony.
Representative Guttenberg asked about the cost calculation
for extraction. He wondered whether the extraction was
contracted with standard calculations or site specific
calculated costs. Representative Seaton replied that the
sale calculations were site specific. The bill related very
specifically to bedload material extracted due to flood
mitigation. Representative Guttenberg related a problem in
his district that led to competition between two commercial
entities extracting gravel. The business that operated
under state permits extracted gravel at significantly lower
costs than the private entity.
Vice-chair Fairclough asked whether the bedload sale was
competitive. Representative Seaton replied that both
competitive and non-competitive sales were allowed under
current law.
10:26:08 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze did not believe the legislation presented
a loss of revenue for the state. He thought that HB 89 was
a win-win situation. The legislation provided important
flood mitigation and incentives for private operators.
Co-Chair Stoltze MOVED to report CS HB 89 (RES) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying new fiscal notes.
CS HB 89 (RES) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with one new indeterminate note
from the Department of Transportation and one new
indeterminate note from the Department of Natural
Resources.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB103-FERC Public Processes.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HB 103 |
| SB 102 Eplanation of Benefits.docx |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
SB 102 |
| SB 102 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
SB 102 |
| HJR 4 Legal opinion aviation fuel tax.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR 4 ltr support businesses.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR 4 Ltr support Sorenson.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR 4 supporters.docx |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR4 - Sponsor Stmt Ver D.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR4 ATIF Payout 6.0.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR 4 ltr support Harbormasters.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR4 support ltr Mobility coalition.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR4 Support Miners 1-2011.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HJR 4 |
| CSHB 183 (CRA) Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| ANCSA Reference.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/17/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB 183 CS WORK DRAFT 041111.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| Impact of Proposed CSHB 183 ( ).pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/17/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| Nenana Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| CS HB 183 ( ) Changes for FIN.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/17/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB 183 Legal Memo.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM SFIN 4/17/2011 10:00:00 AM |
HB 183 |
| HB 106CS(RES)-NEW DEC-WQ-04-12-11.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2011 8:30:00 AM |
HB 106 |