Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/08/2015 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB88 | |
| HB81 | |
| HB116 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 88 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 88
"An Act relating to remittance of tire fees; and
providing for an effective date."
3:03:40 PM
Co-Chair Neuman MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 88, Work Draft 29-GH1044\W (Nauman,
4/6/15). There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
JANE PIERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON,
explained the changes in the Committee Substitute (CS). The
first change appeared on page 1, lines 7 through 9 with the
addition of the following language:
The department may only, on a form required under this
subsection, require a seller to provide information on
tires subject to the tax under this section.
Ms. Pierson elaborated that the change had originated from
Co-Chair Neuman based on a lengthy form he had previously
shown the committee. The second change appeared on page 1,
line 14 where the language "not to exceed $900 a quarter"
had been changed to "not to exceed $600 a quarter..."
Vice-Chair Saddler asked for verification that the
department may only require a seller to provide information
on tires subject to the tax. He asked for confirmation that
the purpose of the language was to limit the information
submitted to the department. Ms. Pierson replied in the
affirmative.
Co-Chair Thompson noted that Representative Kawasaki had
joined the meeting. He remarked that department staff were
available for questions.
Representative Kawasaki referred to the quarterly return
["Alaska Tire Fees Quarterly Return" form (copy on file)].
He thought some of the questions on the form were
unnecessary and wondered who had developed the forms.
ANNA KIM, TAX DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, deferred the
question to her colleague.
Co-Chair Neuman interjected that he had gone over the form
with the Department of Revenue (DOR). He detailed that the
department did not need to know about tractor or ATV tires.
The requirements had been slimmed down to the number of
passenger vehicles and studded tires the business had and
how many it had sold. He explained that the fee had been
reduced because the requirements had been slimmed down
significantly.
Co-Chair Thompson noted the form was much shorter.
Representative Kawasaki believed that sometimes forms were
more complex than necessary. He would not be opposed to
similar language for all forms requested by the government.
Co-Chair Thompson clarified the question. He remarked that
the form had been simplified significantly.
BRANDON S. SPANOS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TAX DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, affirmed that the form had been
simplified. He detailed that the department had removed
page 2 related to inventory. Additionally, clarification
had been added to line 1 to indicate that the question was
related to tires subject to the fee the department was
asking about. Other clarifying changes had been made to the
form instructions. He noted that the forms would be
published as soon as possible.
Representative Gattis communicated that tire dealers in
Mat-Su had been working with the department to improve the
form. She had confidence that the changes would be
beneficial.
Co-Chair Thompson remarked that Representative Guttenberg
had joined the meeting.
Co-Chair Thompson OPENED and CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT CSHB 88(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
Representative Gara facetiously OBJECTED for discussion. He
joked that he had not made any comments about the bill. He
WITHDREW his OBJECTION.
There being NO further OBJECTION, CSHB 88(FIN) was REPORTED
out of committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with
one new fiscal impact note from the Department of Revenue.
3:10:59 PM
AT EASE
3:13:59 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 116 NEW FN DCCED.pdf |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| 03.30.15 DCCED HB 116 Follow Up.pdf |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 61 Air Force Definitions.PDF |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Army Definitions.PDF |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Coast Guard Definition Valor.PDF |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Description of Valor Awards.PDF |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 61 Letters of Support.PDF |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB61 Sponsor Statement FIN.pdf |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 61 |
| HB 88 CS WorkDraft FIN version W.pdf |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 88 |
| Letter re HB 81.pdf |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81 Opposition Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81- Letter of Opposition- James Squyres-February 24.docx |
HFIN 4/8/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |