Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/18/2015 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB88 | |
| HB68 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 88 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 68 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 88
"An Act relating to remittance of tire fees; and
providing for an effective date."
1:34:07 PM
JERRY BURNETT, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TREASURY DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, testified that the bill would align
the filing date for tire fees with other taxes filed on a
monthly basis. He shared that tire fees currently were
filed every 30 days, after the beginning of each quarter,
rather than the end of the month.
BRANDON S. SPANOS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, TAX DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (via teleconference), relayed that
the bill would align the filing date for quarterly tire fee
tax payers. He said that the tax return and payment were
currently due after the end of quarter, which confused some
tax payers during the months of July, October and January
because the quarter ended one day before the end of the
month. He shared that the confusion had led to late filings
which resulted in their losing a timely filing credit,
causing complaints. He stated that the legislation would
eliminate confusion for tax payers, as well as protect them
from the 5 percent penalty for filing only one day late.
1:37:16 PM
Co-Chair Thompson recalled that the committee had studied
the change when it examined the Indirect Expenditure
Report. He noted that the change had the potential of
costing the state money. He believed that filing timely
reports should be a practice of doing business in Alaska.
Vice-Chair Saddler understood that there was a credit to be
earned by vendors who filed in a timely manner as well as a
5 percent penalty for filing late.
Mr. Spanos replied in the affirmative. He said that the
penalty applied to all tax types in the division and the
timely filing credit was specific to only a few tax types,
the tire fee being one of those tax types.
Vice-Chair Saddler asked how much the fees were and how
much of the fee was passed onto the consumer.
Mr. Spanos answered that the tax was $2.50 per new tire and
the additional studded tire fee of $5.00; a new studded
tire would be $7.00 total. He said that there were
exemptions for tires not used on roads, such as tires for
all terrain vehicles.
Vice-Chair Saddler asked how much revenue came in from the
tire fees.
Mr. Spanos replied that he did not have the figure on hand.
Mr. Burnett interjected that the figure was approximately
$1 million annually.
Co-Chair Thompson noted that the 5 percent of the amount
collected would not exceed $900 per quarter. He asked for
further detail.
1:40:54 PM
Mr. Spanos replied that the $900 per quarter figure had
been created when the fee was passed. He believed that the
cap stemmed from concern that the state would pay too much
of an incentive for timely filing.
Co-Chair Thompson understood that the maximum was $900. Mr.
Spanos replied in the affirmative; if 5 percent of the tax
exceeded $900 dollars then the credit would be limited to
$900.
Representative Kawasaki asked for the total value of the
indirect expenditure credits. He surmised that the amount
of money collected did not appear to be high.
Mr. Spanos answered that he did not have the detail on
hand.
Co-Chair Thompson wondered why the vendors received the
credit. He did not believe the state gave rental car
companies credits.
Mr. Spanos relayed that he did not know. He pointed out to
the committee that there was a vehicle rental tax in place.
Mr. Burnett noted that the legislation had been passed
during the Murkowski Administration. He noted that other
credits were being examined in order to decide whether it
made sense to continue to honor them.
Co-Chair Neuman asserted that there were significant
requirements for tire sales that made the credits
necessary. He referred to data provided by Dave and Judy
Schneider, Diversified Tires, Wasilla. He wondered why the
type of tire sold was of such importance.
Mr. Spanos replied that it was fairly common in the
division to request gross income before a net number was
realized. He used the example of cigarette sales; the
division wanted to know whether the cigarettes were being
sold to Indian Reservations or being exported out of the
state. He stated that for exempt purposes the tire would be
taxable except for the exemption; if a tire was sold to the
United States government for official use then it would not
be taxed but the division would still require a record of
the sale of the tire.
1:45:59 PM
Co-Chair Neuman noted that sellers were required to report
how many tires were studded each day. He observed that
companies had to stud tires in September to be ready for
the winter season. He opined that the businesses had to
physically count the number of tires each season. He
believed that the businesses were subject to too many
requirements.
Co-Chair Thompson observed that state government was making
the issue more complex than necessary.
Representative Gattis relayed that she spoke to the same
business owners. She thought that the bill insulted the
intelligence of business owners. She expressed
embarrassment that the legislation was under debate during
the current fiscal climate.
Mr. Burnett rebutted that the bill would make it easier for
tire dealers to know when to report. He noted that there
had been confusion on the issue and cited examples of
businesses reporting at the incorrect time and being
penalized. He said that the department had reviewed some
internal processes and that this particular issue had risen
to the forefront.
1:49:23 PM
Representative Kawasaki thought the change should be made
in regulation, not statute.
Mr. Burnett replied that there was a specific date set in
statute, which could not be changed by regulation.
Representative Kawasaki wondered whether it was the
department's intention to include language that changed the
date to a specific day of the month.
Mr. Burnett replied that the date would be the last day of
the calendar month.
Representative Kawasaki understood that a previous months
tire receipts were due 15 days into the following month.
Mr. Spanos clarified that it was currently 30 days after
the end of the calendar quarter. He explained that the
change would be to the end of month following the end of
the calendar quarter.
Representative Kawasaki queried how many Alaskans filed the
tire tax.
Mr. Spanos replied that the data was available in the
division's annual report. He believed it was approximately
100 filers.
Representative Kawasaki asked for the title of the
division's report.
Mr. Spanos answered that it was the department's tax
division's annual report.
Representative Kawasaki wondered if the report was provided
to the legislature in paper form.
Mr. Burnett replied no. He shared that the report could be
found online.
Representative Guttenberg understood that the bill had been
crafted as a result of complaints from tire tax filers. He
wondered how many filers were repeat offenders and what the
average penalty was.
1:53:14 PM
Mr. Spanos responded was not sure about repeat offenders.
He said that when filers appealed they had claimed that the
date had confused them and should be clarified.
Representative Guttenberg asked how the businesses filed
for the tax.
Mr. Spanos answered that the process included a new online
filing option. Previously filing had been only in paper
form; filers now had both options.
Representative Guttenberg asked about any feedback given on
the integration of the two options.
Mr. Spanos replied that there had been hiccups, but
feedback had primarily been positive.
Representative Guttenberg whether the date change would be
problematic for the computerized filing process.
Mr. Spanos replied no; it involved in simply changing the
field on the computerized spreadsheet.
Representative Gara stated that the bill was to protect
businesses who had been caught in the glitch in the law. He
thought that the bill offered a simple fix that would save
the state money. He expressed confusion at individual
committee member's opposition to the legislation.
1:58:09 PM
Vice-Chair Saddler believed that the bill would provide
simplicity and consistency.
Representative Gattis recommended that the inventory forms
for businesses be reviewed and changed.
Representative Pruitt wondered why this tax item had been
chosen as a priority. He probed whether there were other
opportunities within the tax division for change that could
be included in the bill.
Mr. Burnett answered that the bill had come up through the
tax division to the commissioner's office in the time
needed to get a bill introduced at the beginning of the
current legislative session. He believed there would be
additional items in the future.
Representative Pruitt wondered whether the possible other
items would be introduced in multiple small bills.
Co-Chair Thompson replied in the negative.
HB 88 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB88 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 88 |
| HB 68 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB 68 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB 68 Supporting Documents - ASCC Letter.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB 68 Supporting Documents - Leg Research Report.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB 68 Supporting Documents - OMB Report.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB68 Summary of Changes ver A to ver H.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB 88 NEW FN DOR.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 88 |
| HB 88 DOR Tire Fee Form.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 88 |
| HB 68 Response to HFIN Qustions.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 68 |
| HB 88 DOR Tire Fee Form.pdf |
HFIN 3/18/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 88 |