Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/19/2013 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB87 | |
| HB19 | |
| HB153 | |
| HB94 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 153 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 109 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 94 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 87 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 87
"An Act extending the special education service
agency; and providing for an effective date."
1:33:36 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze stated that committee concerns were
addressed for HB 87 regarding the Special Education Service
Agency (SESA).
Representative Wilson MOVED to ADOPT the proposed committee
substitute for HB 87, Work Draft, 28-LS0392\O, Mischel,
3/18/13,(FIN). Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for discussion.
Representative Wilson explained that the Department of
Education and Early Development (DEED) would now have
oversight of SESA versus the former Governor's Council of
Disabilities and Special Education. The findings and
recommendations on the audit report were considered when
making the decision. She stressed "whereby state and
federal law it is the requirement of the Department of
Education and Early Development to make sure that the
correct services were brought to our special education
students." She noted that a special education director from
the department met with SESA on regular intervals and the
change will allow the legislature to better monitor the
organization and its needs.
REPRESENTATIVE PETE HIGGINS, spoke about the bill. He
appreciated the committee tackling the issue of program
oversight.
Co-Chair Stoltze WITHDREW his OBJECTION..
1:36:12 PM
Representative Kawasaki MOVED a conceptual amendment.
Representative Wilson OBJECTED.
TO: CSHB 87 (FIN) Work Draft 28-LS0392\O
Page 1, line 11:
Delete "$15.75"
Insert "$21.50 [$15.75]"
Page 2, following line 6:
Insert a new bill section to read:
"*Sec. 2. AS 1430.650 is amended by adding a new
subsection to read:
(b) The funding allocated under (a) of this section
shall be adjusted annually by multiplying the amount
allocated in the immediately preceding fiscal year by
0.5 percent."
Representative Kawasaki explained the amendment. He noted
that recent discussions with Legislative Budget and Audit
(LB&A) and DEED led to information about SESA's funding.
The funding had not kept up with inflation or Base Student
Allocation (BSA) increases. He noted that SESA was an
agency that was flat-funded for many years while the total
number of program participants increased substantially. The
$21.50 would allow the program to keep up with inflation.
Representative Wilson responded that the $15.75 was a
minimum requirement. She noted that the education
subcommittee did not discuss the issue because the
program's oversight was through the Department of Health
and Social Services (DHSS). The audit stated that the "plan
did not have the number of students and school district
personnel receiving services and all funding sources." She
noted that the education subcommittee would detail the fund
sources during the interim with the oversight located in
DEED.
Co-Chair Stoltze spoke against the amendment because he was
philosophically opposed to indexing the appropriate
channels when working through the budget process.
Representative Gara pointed out the cost per special
education student in Anchorage or Fairbanks of $50
thousand. He wondered what rural school districts received
to educate special education students with severe
handicaps.
1:39:03 PM
Representative Higgins replied that the current funding was
adequate, but the organization would prefer not to be flat
funded. The SESA board understood that the state was
operating under budget constraints. The goal of the
legislation was to extend the sunset utilizing a
subcommittee process to address the funding issue.
Representative Gara clarified his question. He wondered if
rural areas received funding for special education services
in addition to SESA.
Representative Higgins did not know the answer to the
question.
1:40:42 PM
Representative Wilson responded that the $15 was based on
the average daily attendance and the numbers of students in
the state.
Representative Kawasaki reiterated that the SESA baseline
budget was established 15 years ago. He noted that
inflation alone decreased the value by over 36 percent. The
sum was small and affected the most vulnerable people in
rural Alaska who might not have the assets available within
their own school districts. He pointed out that the joint
legislative education task force recommendations advocated
for an increase for the intensive needs resources to
schools. He noted that not every intensive-needs student
qualified for SESA, but he believed that the money was
wisely spent and impacted those kids who needed the most
help.
Representative Wilson maintained her OBJECTION.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Gara, Kawasaki
OPPOSED: Thompson, Costello, Edgmon, Neuman, Wilson,
Holmes, Munoz, Stoltze and Austerman
The conceptual amendment failed (2/9).
1:43:39 PM
Representative Costello detailed one fiscal note for CSHB
87 showing an impact of $2,035,500 for fiscal year 2014 for
every fiscal year following.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked a department member if fiscal note
was correct.
MARCY HERMAN, SPECIAL ASSISTANT, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, responded yes.
Representative Wilson MOVED to REPORT CSHB 87 (FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
Representative Kawasaki OBJECTED in favor of hearing from
DEED about the implication of the legislation and the
change in oversight from the council to the department.
MS. ELIZABETH SWEENEY NUDELMAN, DIRECTOR, SCHOOL FINANCES
AND FACILITIES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY
DEVELOPMENT, stated that the costs shown in the fiscal note
would remain accurate if SESA continued to operate.
Representative Kawasaki wondered how the substantive change
in oversight would affect the program because DEED would
take over administration and governance of the program.
Ms. Nudleman replied that the SESA organization was run by
a board of directors and the board, with the executive
director would continue to operate the organization. She
stated that the fiscal note would carry the same costs it
had in prior years. She referred to the sponsor for
questions regarding the CS.
Co-Chair Stoltze wished that Representative Kawasaki had
followed protocol by raising the point when the CS was
discussed.
Representative Kawasaki asked if SESA's nonprofit status
impacted the department's ability to regulate the
organization.
Ms. Nudelman responded that the legislation consolidated by
eliminating oversight from the Governor's Council on
Disabilities and Special Education. She was unaware of
further changes. The nonprofit was administered by a board.
1:50:27 PM
Representative Gara stated that he did not understand the
decision to consolidate the agencies governing SESA.
Co-Chair Stoltze explained that the audit report
recommendations were considered when making the decision.
Representative Wilson clarified that the education
subcommittee discussed the matter at great length. The
council did not have the authority, if the money was not
spent correctly, to do anything about it. With new and
specific laws regulating special education, the decision to
give DEED full oversight was prudent. She stated that the
council would continue to review programs. The only change
was providing authority to the department to ensure that
the students got the help they need and money was spent
correctly. The authority was also provided to DEED to bring
the item forth in their budget for future program needs.
Representative Gara appreciated the explanation.
Representative Kawasaki WITHDREW his OBJECTION
CSHB 87(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with one previously published fiscal
impact note: FN1 (EED).
1:54:59 PM
AT EASE
1:55:21 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB153 Support Documents - Wickersham Letter.PDF |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 153 |
| HB153 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 153 |
| HB153 Hickel Citation.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 153 |
| HB153 Google Map.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM STRA 4/2/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 153 |
| HB153 Ak Republican Party Resolution.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 153 |
| Marshall letter of support.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 94 |
| Con and Nellie Miller Bridge Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 94 |
| HB 87 CS FIN WORKDRAFT O Version.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB 87 SESA statute language opinion LAW DEED.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB 87 Kawasaki Amendment to CS-O version.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB 19 Amendment Kawasaki.pdf |
HFIN 3/19/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 19 |