Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/17/1999 01:40 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 87
"An Act relating to money credited to the account of
the state in the unemployment trust fund by the
Secretary of the Treasury of the United States; and
providing for an effective date."
REBECCA GAMEZ, DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR testified in support of HB 87. She
observed that HB 87 provides statutory language to allow a
federal Reed Act distribution. She explained that the
current statute AS 23.20.145(f) allows Reed Act funds to be
used for the payment of unemployment benefits and the
administration of both the Employment Services program and
the Unemployment Insurance program. Under the Balance Budget
Act of 1997, Congress specified that the distribution of
these funds could only apply to the administration of
unemployment insurance. The Balance Budget Act also required
states to pass enabling legislation. The Reed Act
distribution is a transfer of excess funds that are
collected through the federal Unemployment Tax Act. When
these funds have met a proscribed federal ceiling they give
the excess back to the state. The last Reed Act distribution
was in 1958. The legislation would allow the state to
receive the funds.
In response to a question by Co-Chair Therriault, Ms. Gamez
explained that the administrative funds would be used for
equipment purchases. They anticipate a distribution of $600
- $700 thousand dollars. She observed that $500 - $600
thousand dollars were shifted from an unemployment tax
redesign capital improvement project to meet their Y2K
needs. The Reed Act distribution would be used to replace
the capital project funds. There are no general funds in
this component. The department has two years to obligate the
funds.
Representative Kohring asked how much of the money was paid
into the system by Alaskan business. Ms. Gamez stated that
the Alaska base is divided by the federal base. Alaskan
employers do not pay in as much as other states. The state
receives more back then it pays in. Representative Kohring
asked if Alaskan businesses could receive a rebate. Ms.
Gamez stated that they have not considered a rebate. She
noted that Alaska receives 320 percent back for
administrative funding. The next highest state receives 120
percent. She did not think that a rebate would substantially
lower employer taxes.
Co-Chair Mulder asked if the funds were limited to
administration of unemployment compensation. Ms. Gamez
stated that they were limited to administration of
unemployment compensation.
Co-Chair Therriault asked if a square footage fee charged to
the program for their space in a state building would be
covered under administrative costs. Ms. Gamez thought that
the rental fee would be covered under administration as long
as it was square footage for offices that administered the
unemployment insurance program or tax sections. She noted
that there are offices in Juneau, Anchorage and other parts
of the state.
In response to a question by Co-Chair Therriault, Ms. Gamez
clarified that the department expects three distributions
beginning in 1999.
Co-Chair Mulder observed that the funds would have to be
appropriated by the legislature. He summarized that a
portion could be appropriated to an Alaska Public Building
Fund. Ms. Gamez explained that the funds would be
appropriated from the rent collections to the Unemployment
Security Division. The money could then be applied to the
square footage of maintenance in state buildings.
Co-Chair Therriault clarified that it is not an
appropriation bill.
DAN KANOUSE, BUDGET ANALYST, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR explained that the Department of Labor
would receive the funds on October 1, 1999 for use in FY00.
Representative J. Davies MOVED to report HB 87 out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 87 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with a fiscal impact note by the
Department of Labor, dated 3/5/99.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|