Legislature(2019 - 2020)BUTROVICH 205
03/03/2020 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB137 | |
| SJR18 | |
| HB83 | |
| SB165 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SJR 18 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 165 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 137 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 83-PROHIBIT VOTING BY FACSIMILE
3:50:03 PM
CHAIR REVAK reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 83(STA) am(efd del), "An
Act relating to voting by electronic transmission in a state
election."
3:50:48 PM
ERIN HARRINGTON, Staff, Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins,
Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, introduced HB 83 on
behalf of the sponsor, speaking to the following sponsor
statement:
HB 83 prohibits the return of absentee ballots by
facsimile.
Currently, fax is an allowable means for a voter to
return a completed absentee ballot to the Division of
Elections. Most election security experts caution that
the electronic transmission of ballots (such as by
fax) presents cybersecurity risks.
HB 83 seeks to strengthen election security in Alaska.
MS. HARRINGTON explained that the legislation was drafted based
on recommendations by national election security experts to
fortify the integrity of the state's election system. She noted
that the Division of Elections has made some security changes
through regulation but HB 83 addresses security vulnerability
that resides in statute.
She said HB 83 specifically addresses electronic return of
ballots via fax to the Division of Elections because this type
of transmission is susceptible to tampering. She noted that the
division has stopped accepting ballots through its online system
for the same reason. However, absentee voters may continue to
request their ballots be delivered by fax. She highlighted that
the bill was amended on the House floor to exempt members of the
military who are voting absentee; they may continue to return
their voted ballots by fax.
3:55:02 PM
CHAIR REVAK asked if the bill allows people to receive a ballot
by fax but only military members voting absentee would be able
to return the ballot that way.
MS. HARRINGTON answered that is correct. The reasoning is that
the voter is able to ascertain the validity of the ballot on the
receiving end, but that opportunity is not available when the
ballot is returned.
SENATOR COGHILL asked if there is a way to ascertain that the
number of returned absentee ballots is roughly equivalent to the
number that are sent out. He commented that this is an area that
chain of custody can be very important.
MS. HARRINGTON explained that every voted absentee ballot is
reviewed by a bipartisan ballot review board. She deferred to
Gail Fenumiai to discuss the specifics of chain of custody.
3:58:20 PM
GAIL FENUMIAI, Director, Division of Elections, Office of the
Lieutenant Governor, Anchorage, Alaska, explained that before
somebody can receive a ballot by mail or fax, they must complete
an absentee by mail application. This requires the person to
provide their voter identification number, the last four digits
of their Social Security number or their driver's license
number, and their date of birth. The ballot is not sent to the
voter until their identity has been verified. When the voted
ballot is returned, the division first checks to see if the
voter applied for a ballot and then it is reviewed by a
bipartisan board to ensure that the ballot has all the required
information. It has to be posted on or before Election Day or
received by fax by the close of polls on Election Day; it has to
be signed by the voter and have an identifier; and the ballot
must be witnessed.
3:59:59 PM
SENATOR COGHILL asked what the current process is for receiving
absentee ballots from members of the military.
MS. FENUMIAI replied the only option right now to return a
ballot electronically is by fax. Under HB 83, only uniformed
overseas military members may return their voted ballot by fax.
Everybody else who receives a ballot through the online delivery
system or by fax would be required to return their voted ballot
by mail. She said the same verification process is in place for
ballots received either way.
SENATOR COGHILL asked if using other electronic transmission
would require unique identifiers and verification
MS. FENUMIAI answered yes; the same information is required on
an application for either type of voting.
4:01:40 PM
SENATOR WILSON asked how many voted ballots have come in by fax
in the last few elections and which communities they came from.
MS. FENUMIAI replied the division tracks how the ballot is sent
to the voter, but the method of return is not logged. In the
2018 election year, seven voters received a ballot by fax; three
were military domestic and four were overseas citizens. That
same year there were 2,628 Uniformed and Overseas Citizens
Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) voters who applied to receive a
ballot online; 181 were military overseas voters, 1,459 were
military domestic, and 988 were overseas voters.
4:03:37 PM
SENATOR WILSON asked if this legislation would disenfranchise a
small population of voters.
MS. FENUMIAI replied she did not believe so because voters will
have the opportunity to return their ballots by mail. She said
that is best practices according to agencies that work on
security issues.
SENATOR WILSON questioned why the administration did not
introduce legislation to fix this.
MS. FENUMIAI replied the administration did not introduce the
bill, but the Division of Elections is willing and able to
implement it.
4:05:26 PM
MS. HARRINGTON informed the committee that the bill was amended
on the House floor and the body did not catch that it repeals AS
15.20.066(b), which is a set of attestations and oaths that a
voter makes when they return a ballot using electronic
transmission. She explained that initially there was no
exclusion for UOCAVA voters so no ballots would have been
returned electronically. Now there is an exclusion, so the
repealed verifiers need to be addressed either in regulation or
in the bill. She noted that the 2/17/20 memo from Legal Services
in the packets addresses the issue.
4:07:55 PM
CHAIR REVAK opened public testimony on HB 83. After ascertaining
that none who wished to testify, he closed public testimony.
CHAIR REVAK held HB 83 in committee and encouraged people to
submit testimony to [email protected].
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 165 Highlights Doc 1.27.2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 165 |
| SB 165 Sectional Analysis v. A 1.27.2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 165 |
| SB 165 Transmittal Letter 1.27.2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 165 |
| SB 165 Hearing Request 1.31.2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SB 165 |
| HB83 Explanation of Changes Feb 14 2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB83 Sectional Analysis Feb 14 2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB83 Sponsor Statement Feb 14 2020.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| SJR 18 - Letter of Support - League of Women Voters 2.28.20.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Backup document HB 2 from 3.21.1913.jpg |
SSTA 3/3/2020 3:30:00 PM |
HB 2 SJR 18 |