Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
03/12/2019 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s) | |
| Commissioner, Department of Administration | |
| Commissioner, Department of Corrections | |
| HB20 | |
| HJR9 | |
| HB57 | |
| HB83 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HJR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 83-PROHIBIT VOTING BY FACSIMILE
4:24:17 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 83, "An Act relating to voting by electronic
transmission in a state election; and providing for an effective
date."
4:24:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL moved to adopt the committee substitute (CS)
for HB 83, labeled 31-LS0635\M, Bullard, 3/11/19. There being
no objection, Version M was before the committee.
4:25:26 PM
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS, as prime sponsor of HB 83, Version M,
relayed that the proposed legislation was drafted in response to
recommendations by national security experts on steps Alaska
could take to fortify the integrity of its election system. He
said that the Division of Elections (DOE) has made some
regulatory changes as part of an ongoing effort to make
improvements in the security of the election system. He stated
that one of the recommendations from the national experts was to
discontinue electronic - or non-analog - return of ballots to
DOE, therefore, avoiding the possibility of a ballot being
tampered with or manipulated in the process of its return to
DOE. He mentioned that DOE has discontinued accepting ballots
by email and facsimile (fax) for the same reason, since transit
over internet connections would be susceptible to tampering. He
added that fax return of ballots is outdated.
4:28:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether the proposed legislation
would change the rules regarding DOE sending out ballots by fax.
4:28:15 PM
JOHN SCANLON, Staff, Representative Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins,
Alaska State Legislature, replied that Version M would not
change the ability of DOE to deliver absentee ballots to voters
by fax.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX expressed her understanding that currently
you may receive a faxed ballot from DOE after the time has
passed for DOE to send absentee ballots out by mail. She asked
whether currently one has the choice to return the ballot to DOE
by fax or by mail.
MR. SCANLON responded that the only absentee ballots that may be
returned by fax are absentee ballots that a voter received by
fax or through an online ballot delivery system.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether a ballot must be sent back
to DOE by fax if received by fax or whether it may be sent back
by mail.
MR. SCANLON replied that currently someone receiving a ballot by
fax may return it by fax or by mail.
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked for clarification. She stated that
her understanding was that a ballot could not be returned by
fax.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS answered by saying that currently
ballots may be returned by fax; under the proposed legislation,
a ballot would not be allowed to be returned by fax.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX suggested that since DOE barred return of
ballots by email, it could, on its own, change the rules with
respect to faxed ballots.
CO-CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS offered his understanding that DOE had
regulatory authority to disallow ballot return by email.
4:31:51 PM
GAIL FENUMIAI, Director, Division of Elections (DOE), Office of
the Lieutenant Governor (OLG), responded that it was her
understanding that in 2018, DOE made an internal decision to
disallow the return of ballots through the online ballot
delivery system. She explained that the system is not strictly
email; it is a portal system which consists of an open network
over the internet. She added that she does not have any more
history on that decision but would be willing to research it and
provide the committee with more information.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether it is necessary to pass HB
83 to change the rules with respect to the returning of ballots
by fax, or if DOE could accomplish the change on its own through
a regulatory change.
MS. FENUMIAI replied that statutes specifically identify the
returning of voted ballots by fax. She referred to AS
15.20.066(b), which references the return of voted ballots by
fax; that statutory reference would need to be repealed to allow
the change.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked for confirmation that there is no
statutory reference to the returning of ballots through the
portal system.
MS. FENUMIAI answered that to the best of her knowledge, there
is no specific reference to [the portal system]; the portal
system is another form of voting by electronic transmission.
She added that AS 15.20.066 specifically mentions returning
ballots by facsimile.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL suggested that the internet has security
issues regardless of the type of transmission; therefore, the
fax is being eliminated altogether [for ballot return].
MS. FENUMIAI responded that the fax being discussed is a "true"
faxing - through a fax machine. She said that the security
concerns come from how the term faxing has changed over time.
There are many different types of methods of faxing; one can fax
through telephone applications and non-analog type lines, which
was the existing version of technology in 1966 when the statutes
were first implemented; and since then technology has changed.
She relayed that there is concern that with the modern method of
faxing, there may be a "middleman" type of interference.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL suggested that no matter how an individual
receives a ballot, DOE wants a paper ballot returned, and it is
the only way it will accept the ballot.
MS. FENUMIAI replied, "It's all paper ballot." She said that
currently if someone was to return a ballot by fax, DOE could
not use that actual ballot in the count. The DOE bi-partisan
review board would have to make a facsimile of a facsimile onto
the AccuVote ballot paper for the vote to be counted.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked for confirmation that under the
proposed legislation, the faxed ballot would no longer be
accepted. The voter must return a hard copy of the ballot to
DOE; it cannot be returned electronically.
MS. FENUMIAI answered, "That's correct. It would have to be
returned by mail - by the U.S. Postal Service."
4:36:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether someone, who receives an
absentee ballot either by fax or mail, may drop it off at a
polling station.
MS. FENUMIAI responded affirmatively and added that a person may
take it into a polling station or any regional office of DOE.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referred to the use of a privacy sleeve,
making the ballot legitimate. She asked how the process - of a
ballot being received by the voter by fax and returned to DOE by
mail - is valid and secure from tampering, if it didn't come in
a privacy sleeve like a traditional ballot.
MS. FENUMIAI relayed that the voter is supplied with
instructions on putting the voted ballot inside an envelope
before putting it into the envelope to be mailed back to DOE.
She added that voters who receive a ballot by fax and return it
by fax also sign a special oath declaring that they acknowledge
they could possibly be waiving their rights to a secret ballot
by returning the ballot by that method.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked, "What if ... the Russians ... were to
look at our voting rolls and identify a group of registered
voters and request absentee ballots that would be emailed to
them or ... faxed to them, and then fill out those ballots on
their behalf and return them?" He asked, "... what protection
would there be to validate that information and prevent the kind
of fraud that occurs ... analogous ... to tax return fraud ..."
He acknowledged that the legitimate voter might go to the polls
on Election Day only to discover that [a vote had already been
cast in his/her name]. He asked whether that scenario has
occurred and whether it is something DOE is aware of and guards
against.
MS. FENUMIAI answered that if someone applies to vote by mail or
by fax, the application is taken at face value. If DOE can
identify the voter based on the identification that he/she
provides and there is a signature, DOE accepts the application.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS stated that HB 83 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR9.PDF |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 - Sponsor Statement 3.5.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 - Supporting Document, EP Image Options 3.5.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM SCRA 5/7/2019 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HJR 9 Amendment (Rep. JKT).pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HJR 9 |
| HB083 ver A 3.6.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 ver M 3.11.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Summary of Changes ver A to ver M 3.11.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Sectional Analysis 3.11.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Sponsor Statement 3.11.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB083 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE 3.11.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| HB057 ver M 2.26.19.PDF |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057 ver M Sponsor Statement 2.26.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057 ver M additional document - email string DLWD 2.26.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057 ver M additional document - email from FYSA 2.26.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057 ver M additional document - legal memo to ver A 2.26.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057 ver M additional document - Code of Federal Regulations 2.26.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB57 Fiscal Note DOLWD-WH 3.5.2019.pdf |
HSTA 3/5/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB020 ver A 01.07.19.PDF |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 ver S 03.07.19.PDF |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Summary of Changes Version A to S 03.11.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Sponsor Statement 03.11.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Sectional Analysis 03.11.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Supporting Document - 49th Rising_AS44.41.070_SAK Report.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Supporting Document - DPS-Annual-Sexual-Assualt-Kit-Inventory-Report-2018_ 11.01.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Supporting Document - SAK-Inventory-Report-and-Plan-DPS-2017.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Supporting Documents - Rape Kit Joyful Heart Foundation.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Supporting Documents STAR policy priorities.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 Fiscal Note Ver A 3.11.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |
| HB020 State Affairs Presention 3.12.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/12/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/18/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 20 |