Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/08/1999 01:20 PM House JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 82 - IMMUNITY: CLAIMS ARISING FROM Y2K PROBLEMS
CHAIRMAN KOTT announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 82, "An Act relating to immunity for certain claims
arising out of or in connection with the year 2000 date change; and
providing for an effective date."
Number 0901
REPRESENTATIVE CROFT moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute, Version LS0398\K, Ford, 4/1/99, as the working document
before the committee. There being no objection, it was so ordered.
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG directed the committee to pages 1 and 2 of
the proposed committee substitute which now includes the finding
intent language. He specified that the intent language can be
found on page 2, lines 13 through 26. Representative Rokeberg
pointed out that Representative Croft's concern is addressed on
page 2, paragraph (4) which reads, "if a party is unsuccessful in
asserting the year 2000 date change defenses created in this Act,
nothing in this Act would preclude a court or jury from awarding
compensatory or punitive damages as provided by law;". He stated
that the intent language was requested in order to leave no doubt
as to what the bill does. On page 3, line 4, the word
"substantial" was inserted before "efforts" and on page 3, line 5,
the words "such as" were inserted. He explained that inserting
"such as" language allows the business to be in compliance without
having to achieve all the efforts listed under paragraph (1). On
page 3, the first word of each subparagraph has added the suffix
"ing" in the proposed committee substitute. He pointed out that on
page 3, line 15 the language has been changed to "generally
accepted business practices of a business sector".
REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI noted the intent language and the contract
language on page 4.
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG pointed out the language on page 4, line 8
refers to "noneconomic losses" which he believed allowed for
punitive and compensatory if (indisc.).
Number 1096
REPRESENTATIVE CROFT moved to report CSHB 82, Version LS0398\K,
Ford, 4/1/99, as amended, from the committee with individual
recommendations and the attached zero fiscal note. There being no
objection, CSHB 82(JUD) so moved from the House Judiciary Standing
Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|