Legislature(2025 - 2026)GRUENBERG 120

03/06/2025 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ SB 43 WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH TELECONFERENCED
Moved SB 43 Out of Committee
-- Public Testimony <Time Limit May Be Set> --
+= HB 81 ACCESS TO MARIJUANA CONVICTION RECORDS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= HB 91 MARIJUANA: TAX/RETAIL STORES/REGISTRATION TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
*+ HB 119 GAS PIPELINE FAIRBANKS SPUR TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= HB 30 OFFICE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled but Not Heard
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
                                                                                                                                
          HB 81-ACCESS TO MARIJUANA CONVICTION RECORDS                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
3:59:22 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CARRICK announced that the  next order of business would be                                                               
HOUSE BILL  NO. 81,  "An Act restricting  the release  of certain                                                               
records of convictions; and providing for an effective date."                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:02:27 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE DAVID  NELSON, Alaska State Legislature,  as prime                                                               
sponsor,  presented HB  81.   He  said the  proposed  bill is  an                                                               
important step in  providing an opportunity for  people with low-                                                               
level  misdemeanor  marijuana  possession  convictions  on  their                                                               
record to make  more significant economic impact  to their state.                                                               
He   remarked  that   hardworking  Alaskans   face  barriers   to                                                               
employment, housing,  license acquisition, and  even volunteering                                                               
opportunities,   leaving  them   to  be   unable  to   make  full                                                               
contributions  to  the  communities.   According  to  a  National                                                               
Conference of  State Legislators  (NCSL) report,  as of  2023, 28                                                               
states  have produced  legislation that  applies specifically  to                                                               
the confidentiality of records pertaining to certain marijuana-                                                                 
related  offenses.   He  said  that  at  a  time when  Alaska  is                                                               
struggling to  find qualified workers  to fill job  openings, the                                                               
state  should  not  be  excluding   individuals  based  on  these                                                               
criteria.   He  said  that  HB 81  would  make certain  marijuana                                                               
possession  convictions confidential  on basic  background checks                                                               
while  keeping  those  convictions  available.    He  noted  that                                                               
qualified individuals  who are  21 or  older at  the time  of the                                                               
crime, possess one  ounce of cannabis or less, and  have not been                                                               
convicted  of  another  crime  would   be  able  to  contact  the                                                               
Department of Public  Safety (DPS) to make those  crimes on their                                                               
record confidential.   He clarified  that this would  not expunge                                                               
or  remove the  crimes  from  their record.    He  said that  the                                                               
proposed bill would  give DPS until January 1, 2028,  to edit its                                                               
database and  amend its records  in accordance with  the proposed                                                               
bill.   He noted that this  would require hiring a  contractor to                                                               
make  programming   changes  as   well  as  a   criminal  justice                                                               
technician to investigate and amend the records.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:04:57 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
BOGDAN  GILMUTDINOV, Staff,  Representative David  Nelson, Alaska                                                               
State   Legislature,   on   behalf    of   the   prime   sponsor,                                                               
Representative Nelson,  offered the sectional analysis  for HB 81                                                               
[copy  available  in  committee  file],  which  read  as  follows                                                               
[original punctuation provided]:                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     Section  1:   Amends  AS  12.62.160(b)(8)   to  include                                                                  
     reference to the added subsection  (f) in paragraph (8)                                                                    
     to read  "or criminal justice information  as described                                                                    
     in  (f)  of  this section."  Subsection  (b)  describes                                                                    
     conditions around  which an individuals  (sic) criminal                                                                    
     record may be released.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
     Section  2:  Amends  AS  12.62.160   by  adding  a  new                                                                  
     subsection   (f).   Subsection    (f)   describes   the                                                                    
     conditions  under which  information on  an individuals                                                                    
     (sic)   record  cannot   be  released.   Paragraph  (4)                                                                    
     requires  the individual  to submit  a  request to  the                                                                    
     agency not to release portions of their record.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     Section  3: Repeals  AS 12.62.160(f)(4)  on January  1,                                                                  
     2028.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
     Section 4: Establishes an effective  date of January 1,                                                                  
     2026.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NELSON added  that David  Morgan with  the Reason                                                               
Foundation  and  Lisa  Purinton with  the  Department  of  Public                                                               
Safety were available to answer any questions.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:06:39 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE said  that he was curious  about the fiscal                                                               
note  associated with  the  bill.   He asked  Ms.  Purinton if  a                                                               
contractor was  going to be used,  he noted that the  fiscal note                                                               
mentioned 400  hours of  work associated with  a contractor.   He                                                               
said that  contractors often work at  their own places.   He said                                                               
that looking close at the fiscal  notes, he was wondering why the                                                               
state would  need to  buy contractor office  materials such  as a                                                               
desk and computer.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
4:07:52 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
LISA   PURINTON,  Director,   Division  of   Statewide  Services,                                                               
Department of Public  Safety, clarified that there  are two parts                                                               
to the fiscal  note associated with HB  81.  One part  is for the                                                               
contractor, paid at  $140 an hour for 400 hours  to reprogram the                                                               
mainframe  criminal history  repository  to  prevent the  records                                                               
from being displayed, as proposed under  HB 81.  The second piece                                                               
is for a  temporary staff position for two years.   The new staff                                                               
would   work  with   DPS  to   research  records   pertaining  to                                                               
individuals that request  that their records not  be displayed as                                                               
outlined  in the  bill.   The  bill would  require  this work  be                                                               
completed by 2028.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE  noted that 8,500 people  would potentially                                                               
be impacted  and it's going to  take two years to  pull them from                                                               
the system.  He asked whether this was an accurate assessment.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON confirmed that's correct.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
4:09:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE MOORE  asked whether a minor  marijuana conviction                                                               
still  would show  up on  a  federal court  record despite  being                                                               
pulled from the Alaska record.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NELSON  asked  whether  she was  referring  to  a                                                               
background check or something like court view.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  MOORE responded  on court  view additionally,  so                                                               
both.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NELSON  responded  that  the  court  view  system                                                               
maintains its  own website  and the  Alaska Court  System amended                                                               
its website to amend records from public view.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE MOORE asked  whether they would be  hidden on just                                                               
court view.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NELSON said  that currently,  the bill  would not                                                               
touch the court view system.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE MOORE  asked whether  the information  would still                                                               
show up on federal systems.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON responded that yes,  HB 81 would cover only                                                               
low-level background  checks, high-level security  clearances and                                                               
such would not be excluded.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:11:28 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE  asked Representative Nelson why  the age of                                                               
21 was selected as opposed to 18.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON  responded that  this question may  be best                                                               
answered by Ms. Purinton.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MS. PURINTON answered that she would  need to look at the statute                                                               
and may  need to  "phone a  friend" but  21 is  the legal  age to                                                               
purchase and use marijuana.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:12:45 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  STORY  commented   that  the  current  employment                                                               
vacancies were  high at the  department.  She then  remarked that                                                               
given  the 8,500  people  that would  be  affected, the  proposed                                                               
legislation could be beneficial.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:13:31 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CARRICK  asked whether it would  be warranted to take  it a                                                               
step  further and  expunge the  records for  these types  of low-                                                               
level marijuana convictions.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON  responded that the  intent of the  bill is                                                               
to facilitate access to low-level  volunteering positions or even                                                               
housing with a  change to background check information.   He said                                                               
that expungement of records is  a completely different issue, and                                                               
he did not want  to work on it at the moment.   He also said that                                                               
there is no expungement in the State of Alaska.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CARRICK noted that Representative  Nelson included a really                                                               
interesting  article about  expungement  to  the committee  [copy                                                               
available in committee file].                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MR. GILMUTDINOV  noted that expungement  is a nebulous term.   He                                                               
said that the blanket term  is "record clearance," which includes                                                               
annulment,   erasure,    expungement,   destruction,   dismissal,                                                               
sealing, and  setting aside.   He said the definitions  for these                                                               
terms vary depending on jurisdiction and  state.  He said that in                                                               
Alaska,  there  is  technically no  expungement,  but  there  are                                                               
certain things  that can be  done with regard to  sealing certain                                                               
documents.   He  said that  the article  which Chair  Carrick was                                                               
referring to  draws a correlation between  record clearing/record                                                               
amending procedure and the outcomes  associated with it.  He said                                                               
the  article   suggests  that  by  following   these  procedures,                                                               
individuals have greater employment prospects and wage earnings.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
4:16:49 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  HOLLAND  asked  about   court  view  and  federal                                                               
searches.   He  asked whether  the impact  of the  bill would  be                                                               
significant  enough  to   withhold  information  from  background                                                               
checks.  He asked whether  backgrounds checks would utilize court                                                               
view and federal databases, and  he inquired whether not changing                                                               
accessibility to these  other databases would affect  the goal of                                                               
the bill.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NELSON asked  Representative  Holland to  clarify                                                               
"other databases."                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  HOLLAND  asked  whether this  bill  would  remove                                                               
records from  court view or any  federal searches.  He  said that                                                               
he  understood  the   answer  as  no,  it  would   not,  and  the                                                               
information  would still  be available  in other  databases.   He                                                               
raised concerns whether this would serve Alaskans.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NELSON  responded  that  right  now,  court  view                                                               
systems have  been covered;  the proposed  bill would  cover only                                                               
records  on the  state level.   He  reiterated that  higher-level                                                               
background checks could  access information.  He said  that for a                                                               
low-level, quick  search of DPS,  the information would  not show                                                               
up.                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
4:19:47 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CARRICK,  after ascertaining that there  were no additional                                                               
questions,  announced  that  the  committee  would  hear  invited                                                               
testimony.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:20:05 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
DAVID MORGAN,  Legislative Affairs, Reason Foundation,  began his                                                               
invited testimony in  support of HB 81.  He  said that too often,                                                               
low-level offenses come  with lifelong punishment.   He said that                                                               
penalties should be  proportional to the severity  of an offense,                                                               
especially  considering that  recreational use  of marijuana  has                                                               
been  legal  since  2014.   He  remarked  that  individuals  with                                                               
criminal  records  face  difficulty  in  engaging  in  productive                                                               
activities;  this  includes  finding  a  job,  securing  housing,                                                               
obtaining   occupational   licenses,  and   accessing   financial                                                               
services.   He  said  that  HB 81  is  a  necessary step  towards                                                               
fairness  in Alaska.   This  legislation would  prohibit agencies                                                               
from  releasing  criminal  records   related  to  cases  where  a                                                               
defendant  was convicted  of possessing  less than  one ounce  of                                                               
marijuana.  Before January 2028,  people must request to have the                                                               
conviction records  withheld; after January 2028,  all conviction                                                               
records would  be withheld.   He said  that without  an automatic                                                               
process, data from  other states showed, less than  10 percent of                                                               
eligible individuals  take action  to have their  records sealed.                                                               
He said  that HB  81 would  provide much  needed relief  for many                                                               
Alaskans.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
4:21:59 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CARRICK announced that HB 81 was held over.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 43 Sponsor Statement version A 02.26.2025.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43
SB0043A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43
SB 43 Sectional Analysis version A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43
SB 43 Fiscal Note.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43
SB 43 Letters of Support Version A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43
SB 43 Research notable-women-of-alaska-subject-guide.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43
HB81 Sponsor Statement Version A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 81
HB81 Ver A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 81
HB81 Sectional Analysis Version A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 81
HB 81 Fiscal Note DPS-CJISP-2-19-25.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 81
HB81 Backup RF One Pager.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 81
HB81 Backup NCSL Cannabis Policy Overview.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 81
HB 119 Sponsor Statement version A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB0119A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB 119 Sectional Analysis version A.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB 119 Fiscal Note DCCED-AGDC-2-28-25.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB 119 Research AGDC Fact Sheet 1.15.20.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB 119 Research Alaska LNG Project map 1.png HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB 119 Research Alaska LNG Project map 2.png HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 119
HB 91 Marijuana Tax Changes Analysis.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 91
HB 91 Backup RRF-MET Grant Recipients.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 91
HB 91 Fiscal Note DPS-CDVSA-2-27-25.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 91
HB 30 Amendment Packet HSTA 3-6-25.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
HB 30
SB 43 Written Testimony 3-6-25.pdf HSTA 3/6/2025 3:15:00 PM
SB 43