Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
05/13/2019 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB127 | |
| HB24 | |
| HB81 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 127 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 81-PROHIBIT PLASTIC RETAIL BAGS
5:10:10 PM
CHAIR WOOL announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 81, "An Act prohibiting disposable plastic
shopping bags; and providing for an effective date."
5:11:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, introduced HB 81. He paraphrased parts of the sponsor
statement [included in the committee packet], which read in its
entirety as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Single-use plastic bags are harmful to our
environment, our wildlife, and our economy.
Researchers have shown that wildlife, such as caribou
and moose, will eat plastic bags, which cannot be
digested and will ultimately kill the animal
typically through starvation. There have been
countless cases of birds dying from ingesting plastic
fragments found on beaches, including single-use
plastic bags. Plastics in the ocean get broken down
into microplastics, which are finding their way into
our seafood, which then finds its way onto our plates
along with whatever chemicals are leaching out of
the plastic. For a subsistence state, this is
unacceptable.
Our resources should not be succumbing to plastic
pollution and our residents should not have to worry
about their health after enjoying a subsistence
harvest.
Health and well-being aside, plastic bag pollution is
detrimental to the aesthetic of our beautiful state.
It is up to us as a state to stop needless pollution
and change wasteful behavior. Alaskan communities are
already stepping up and taking control; it's time the
state follows suit. HB 81 is an effort to reduce waste
and pollution and protect our renewable resources.
HB 81 is also a first step Alaska can take to be a
responsible global environmental stakeholder and to
protect already overstressed marine ecosystem of the
North Pacific.
I encourage you to support this legislation and urge
you to reach out to my office with any questions.
5:13:45 PM
ELISE SORUM-BIRK, Staff, Representative Andy Josephson, Alaska
State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Josephson, prime
sponsor, provided a presentation entitled, "HB 81 Plastic Bag
Ban." Ms. Sorum-Birk reminded the committee that plastic
pollution is detrimental to the environment and wildlife. She
informed the committee there is at least one recorded death of a
northern fur seal in Alaska due to entanglement in the loop of a
plastic bag handle (slide 2). She said plastic bags are
overuse-free and readily accessible; light and easily carrier by
the wind and water; and the prevalent type of litter, both on
land and in the water. Furthermore, they are easy to substitute
with a sturdy, reusable bag (slide 3).
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON noted that the picture on slide 3,
taken at Lake Aleknagik, illustrates that plastic can end up in
the most remote places.
MS. SORUM-BIRK turned attention to plastic bags in the
environment. She stated that polyethylene does not biodegrade.
Instead, it photodegrades breaking into ever smaller pieces.
Many organisms are at risk for entanglement and ingestion and
fat-soluble toxins are linked to ingested plastic particles.
These POPs, she said, accumulate in animal tissues and toxins
increase in concentration up the food chain (slide 4). She
addressed international policy trends regarding plastic bags.
More than 40 countries have a plastic bag ban; Bangladesh was
the first in 2002 and Kenya has the strictest ban with a
punishment of up to 4 years in prison and hefty fines (slide 6).
5:18:39 PM
CHAIR WOOL asked why Europe hasn't been as progressive in
banning plastic bags.
MS. SORUM-BIRK replied many European countries have enacted a
plastic bag ban or fee. Additionally, the European Union has
passed a resolution to ban all single-use plastics.
5:19:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS recalled reading that a large percentage
of plastic bag pollution came from several global watersheds -
of one which is in China. He asked if that is accurate and how
recently China banned plastic bags.
MS. SORUM-BIRK stated that China and India have both enacted bag
bans, as well as many pacific countries. She noted that
enforcement has been an issue in both countries.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked for the percentage of plastic bag
waste in the Gulf of Alaska that is from local sources versus
from China.
MS. SORUM-BIRK said it can be hard to track the waste stream in
the Pacific. She then turned attention to policy trends in the
"lower 49" (slide 7). In Alaska, 17 communities no longer allow
plastic bags. Denali Borough and Homer are also considering a
plastic bag ban. She further described ways in which people
around the state are attacking this problem (slides 8-9). One
motivation behind the Matsu ban was ruminant ingestion of
plastics. Plastic bags were being found in the digestive tracks
of caribou and moose and were even the cause of death in several
cases (slide 10).
MS. SORUM-BIRK summarized the sectional analysis for HB 81
[included in the committee packet] and read the following:
Section 1: Adds a new section AS 46.06
AS 46.06.145(a) establishes a ban on retailers
providing "disposable plastic shopping bag" to
customers.
AS 46.06.145(b) clarifies exceptions to the bag ban.
AS 46.06.145(c) establishes fines for retailers who
violate this section.
AS 46.06.145(d) provides definitions for "disposable
plastic shopping bag", "retail seller" and "reusable
bag."
5:27:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked how much we know on the effects of
digesting the photodegraded plastic particles in salmon and the
prospective impacts on Alaska salmon fisheries.
MS. SORUM-BIRK replied that the corresponding research is
ongoing. She stated that there is a high rate of ingestion in
fish populations and bird populations. More than 50 percent of
seabirds are found with plastic in their digestive track.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS questioned whether significant plastic
pollution makes it difficult for the endangered Cook Inlet
beluga population to recover.
5:29:40 PM
MS. SORUM-BIRK said other harmful chemicals adhere to the pieces
of photodegraded plastic in the ocean, which is what causes the
toxicity in the food stream.
MS. SORUM-BIRK returned attention to the sectional analysis and
related that section 2 adds an effective date of January 1,
2021. This way retailers would have enough time to use up the
plastic bags they have already purchased.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON offered his belief that Alaskan cities
can no longer tolerate the visual impact of plastic bags and
their impact on wildlife and fish. He added that thinking of
the ban creates some inconvenience; however, people would
adjust.
CHAIR WOOL asked if communities like Anchorage had thought of
Hawaii's approach, in which every "significant" municipality has
a ban.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON suggested doing something similar to
the smoke-free workplace ban so communities could a have
conversation and the option to opt-out.
5:33:06 PM
CHAIR WOOL suggested that a ban on plastic bags would increase
the use of paper bags leading to a "carbon dioxide situation"
due to cutting trees for the paper.
MS. SORUM-BIRK acknowledged that there have been European
studies that found the production of a paper bag takes more
energy and a higher carbon footprint. Plastic bags are
prevalent because of those reasons - they are cheap, easy to
produce, and ubiquitous. However, the studies failed to
consider how wildlife in the marine environment is affected and,
ultimately, it is the impact on the environment caused by the
plastic bag pollution that is the reason behind this bill. She
pointed out that the committee could consider an acting fee on
paper bags.
CHAIR WOOL surmised that the impetus for a fee would be to
motivate people to buy a permanent cotton bag instead of
continually being charged for paper [bags].
MS. SORUM-BIRK answered yes.
5:36:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS expressed appreciation for hearing this
bill. He said given the amount of money in Alaska's fishing and
guiding industry, he didn't realize this was an issue for
"terrestrial creatures." He opined that taking the
precautionary principal is a wise approach and offered his
support for the passage of HB 81. He added that there are
currently multiple stresses on Alaska's fisheries, including
temperature and rising levels of acidity, which makes it harder
for species to reproduce. He said he would hate to see the
cessation of the Bristol Bay fishery given how much money is at
stake.
5:37:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REVAK expressed concern about poly-reusable bags,
which contain more plastic, becoming litter and suggested the
use of biodegradable plastic.
MS. SORUM-BIRK said the problem with compostable plastic is that
it takes a certain heat level to biodegrade; therefore, an
industrial composting facility is necessary.
REPRESENTATIVE REVAK contended that plastic bags are suggested
to be a more environmentally friendly solution to paper bags.
He indicated that the impact could be litter that is more
durable from the reusable bags.
MS. SORUM-BIRK explained that they defined "reusable bags" as
sturdy enough to be reused at a minimum of 75 times. She
directed attention to page 2, lines 23-30, emphasizing that they
must be made with plastic that is at least four mils thick. She
noted that such a bag would not degrade quickly.
REPRESENTATIVE REVAK reaffirmed that it would take even longer
for the reusable bags to biodegrade and could potentially cause
even more of a hazard and have counter effective results.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON argued that the current plastic bags
travel whereas the thicker mil bags won't. He explained that
the thicker mil will accumulate like normal garbage, which is a
secondary concern. He offered his belief that plastic bags are
the poster child because they get stuck in trees, for example,
for years. He said its depressing and invokes the feeling that
the state is disrespected.
5:43:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO noted that he has heard a very
aggressive stance that this is a local issue from people in his
district.
5:44:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN pointed out that much of Alaska remains an
unorganized borough which the legislature is the governing body
for; therefore, if the legislature does not act there is no ban.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO replied that tribal governments have
been recognized as being sovereign. He offered his
understanding that they would have the ability to apply the ban
in many locations.
CHAIR WOOL asked if switching to thicker [plastic] bags would
sufficiently solve the problem.
MS. SORUM-BIRK said 4 mils thick is substantial.
CHAIR WOOL asked if the bill has requirements on the types that
businesses can use.
5:48:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said it would restrict the use of
plastic bags for them as well.
MS. SORUM-BIRK said in the bill, a retail seller includes
market, grocery store, convenience store, drug store, or similar
establishment; it must be located in a permanent building; it
must be selling consumer household supplies.
5:49:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked if the bill sponsor envisioned HB 24
incorporating restaurants.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON said yes, contingent on how "similar
establishment" is defined.
CHAIR WOOL questioned how Anchorage deals with smaller
businesses regarding their bag ban.
5:51:51 PM
CHAIR WOOL announced HB 81 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 127.Bill CS Version M.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Sponsor.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Sectional.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Fiscal DHHS2.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Fiscal DHHS.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Fiscal DCCED.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support Melissa Davis.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Alaska Dental HPSA.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup State by State.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support ADHA.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support Alaska Primary Care Association.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support Dental Hygiene Advanced Practice.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support Jeff Kilgore.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support Letters May 1.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 127.Backup Support Letters.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 127 |
| HB 24.Bill version A.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Sponsor.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Sectional.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Fiscal Note DEED.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Updated Support Letters 4.24.19.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 2/17/2020 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Immersion Student Acheivement.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Support Letter ANLPAC.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Support Letter Leslie Harper.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Support Letter Margi Dashevsky.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Support Letters.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Backup Teacher Certificate Types.docx |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Amendment 1.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 24.Amendment 2.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 24 |
| HB 81.Bill Version B.PDF |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Sponsor.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Sectional.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Fiscal.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Summary of Changes.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Opposition Donna Marsh .pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Opposition Letter.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Presentation.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support ADN.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Alcanna.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Letter AYEA.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Letter Bags of Change.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Letter Forbes.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Letter Haines.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Marine Debris in US.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Marine Debris.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support New York Times.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support NPR.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Peninsula Clarion.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support UN Ocean Conference.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 81.Backup Support Washington Post.pdf |
HL&C 5/13/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 81 |