Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
02/01/2024 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Overview: Fy 24 Supplemental Request | |
| HB81 | |
| HB148 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 148 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 81
"An Act relating to the transfer of a title on the
death of the owner; and providing for an effective
date."
3:02:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER, SPONSOR, introduced HB 81.
He read the sponsor statement (copy on file):
The process of probate in the state of Alaska can take
anywhere from six months to several years, and can
cost family members and beneficiaries thousands,
potentially tens of thousands of dollars in legal and
filing fees. While the State Legislature has already
taken great strides to reduce the costs of probate,
there is still much room for improvement.
House Bill 81 continues in spirit with the Uniform
Real Property Transfer on Death Act (URPTDA), which
unanimously passed both the House and Senate in 2014.
URPTDA created the Transfer on Death (TOD) deed, which
allows for nonprobate transfers of real property. TOD
deeds allow Alaskans to select a beneficiary who will
receive the property at their passing and removes that
property from the process of probate.
In 2016, legislation similar to HB 81 was introduced
but the legislation failed to pass that session. HB81
is nearly identical, although it expands the concept
to apply both to vehicles and boats that are issued
titles through the state.
HB81 continues the ongoing effort to reduce the costs
of probate for Alaskans and creates a streamlined
service through the DMV through which they can
designate beneficiaries for both cars and boats
through a simple form. The TOD titles will be
available for all boats and vehicles for which the DMV
provides titles, which also includes some mobile
manufactured homes under AS 45.29.102(66). The program
will be self-sustaining through fees.
At no cost to the state, HB 81 will allow countless
Alaskans to pass down boats, vehicles, and some
manufactured homes to beneficiaries with more ease,
and will help simplify and streamline the potentially
complicated, costly, and painful process of probate
following the death of a loved one.
RYAN MCKEE, REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER STAFF, noted
there were testifiers online available to answer questions.
Representative Galvin understood that the bill would come
at no cost to the state. She asked if the Division of Motor
Vehicles (DMV) could provide information on whether the
bill would require additional paperwork or that staff work
overtime hours. She liked the bill but wanted to ensure
that it was clear whether more support would be needed.
3:06:59 PM
DAVID DUNLAP, VEHICLE PROGRAM MANAGER, DIVISION OF MOTOR
VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION (via
teleconference), responded that there was a small cost
associated with the programing changes that would be
required in order for the DMV to facilitate the process. He
emphasized that the bill would not be excessively
prohibitive for the public.
Representative Hannan relayed that she was supportive of
the bill. She asked if there was a way to add airplanes
into the transfer of ownership upon death in addition to
vehicles and boats.
Representative Rauscher responded that he would be
amendable to the addition of planes if Representative
Hannan were to suggest adding it.
Representative Hannan noted that the remainder of the bill
addressed transfer of ownership through an already
established process. She had been asked by constituents how
ownership of airplanes was tracked or whether it was
federally regulated. She did not want to derail the bill or
overinflate the cost. She asked Co-Chair Foster if he could
comment because she was aware that he owned a plane.
Co-Chair Foster replied that he had to register his plane
with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The
question might require some additional research but he was
certain that the FAA would be involved.
Representative Hannan reiterated that she did not want to
derail the bill and thought it would cover more Alaskans.
She noted that the only issue she had heard about relating
to the bill was the potentiality for airplanes to be
included.
Co-Chair Foster OPENED public testimony. He detailed the
way in which written testimony could be submitted to the
committee.
3:11:21 PM
GORDON WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY, KETCHIKAN (via teleconference),
testified that he was an attorney and a member of ATEP
[Alaska Trust of Estate Professionals] and his practice
focused on probate, estate planning, wills and trusts, and
trusts administration. Probate received a bad reputation
which he thought was unfortunate because the probate
process in Alaska was done online. He thought the bad press
on probate was mostly unwarranted. The probate on the
transfer of death title was a good process which with he
was intimately familiar. He was familiar with Colorado law
and relayed that Alaska law had safeguards that did not
exist in Colorado. In Alaska, people were required to go to
the DMV and obtain a new title with the beneficiaries on
board. There would also be a fee charge for the new title
which meant that there would be incoming revenue. The
fiscal note might not have taken into consideration the
fees collected. He noted that the transfer of death deed
took into account issues that occurred in probate. He
thought the bill would help expediate the transfer process.
Co-Chair Foster understood that Mr. Willams was a member of
"ATEP" and he asked what it was.
Mr. Williams responded that ATEP stood for Alaska Trust of
Estate Professionals, which was a troop of professionals
responsible for reviewing law. He thought that the
legislature had consulted with ATEP in the past.
3:16:01 PM
LINDA HULBERT, SELF, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference),
testified that she had been an agent for New York Life
Insurance Company for 35 years and she thought the bill
would be favorable for a vast number of Alaskans. She
explained that everyone needed to make a plan regarding
asset ownership. When a vehicle or boat was only in a
deceased individual's name, it was not possible to ensure
the vehicle or boat. She thought the bill would be an
important tool to help Alaskans make a plan and keep costs
down. She urged support for the bill.
3:18:46 PM
MATTHEW BLATTMACHR, PEAK TRUST, ANCHORAGE (via
teleconference), agreed with the comments made by Ms.
Hulbert and Mr. Williams. He added that the bill would
create more efficiencies within the Alaska Court System.
The probate process in Alaska was deficient in comparison
to many other states and the bill would help modernize the
process. The bill would also help allow more vehicles and
boats to pass through direct assignment rather than
involving the courts. He thought that the cost savings to
the courts would be more substantial than any costs
associated with implementing the bill.
Representative Hannan asked Mr. Blattmachr to describe the
process of transferring ownership of an airplane upon the
death of the owner.
Mr. Blattmachr responded that the transfer would be
federally regulated and not managed at the state level. He
did not think the bill would successfully change the
process. He understood that it would be helpful to include
airplanes in the bill, but he did not think federal
regulations would allow for any changes.
Representative Hannan asked if trusts for airplane owners
were generally established as a separate entity.
Mr. Blattmachr replied that airplanes were an important
asset for many Alaskans. He explained that airplanes were
not typically held in trusts for the majority of trusts he
administered.
Co-Chair Foster thought that it sounded like an act of the
U.S. Congress.
Representative Rauscher noted that he especially
appreciated the testimony from Mr. Williams because he made
the point that the majority of title transfers would help
pay for the process due to fee collection.
3:23:26 PM
Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony.
HB 81 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 148 APS_OutcomesReport_2024 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148 CS WorkDraft v.U 013024.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148 Support_Redacted as of 1.29.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148APS_At-A-Glance_2024 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB 148 presentation - updated 1-26-2024.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB0148 Summary of Changes 1.29.24 CS.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| HB148 CS Sponsor Statement 1.27.24.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 148 |
| 02.01.24 OMB House Finance FY2024 Supplemental Budget Overview.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |
| OMB FY2024 Supplemental Bill Summary Spreadsheet - 1.30.2024 HFIN.pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |
| HFIN OMB Supplemental Budget Follow-up to 02.01.24 Hearing 02.23.24 .pdf |
HFIN 2/1/2024 1:30:00 PM |
HB 299 |