Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/09/2015 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB116 | |
| HB100 | |
| HB81 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 155 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 100 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 81
"An Act relating to an exemption from the regulation
of construction contractors."
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY TILTON, SPONSOR, provided a brief
summary of the bill. She explained that HB 81 related to
the licensing of residential contractors. The bill did not
prevent owner-built Alaskan housing, selling an owner-built
home, or propose a new licensure. Due to a loophole in
current law, the "owner-builder exemption" created a
situation where unlicensed contractors had engaged in
business while avoiding requirements for licensing,
bonding, and insurance. She reported that the language
change in the new committee substitute was developed
through discussions between the Homebuilders Association,
individual Alaskans, and the Department of Labor and
Workforce Development. The bill "reasonably" included all
individuals engaged in home construction as a regular
course of business under the existing residential
contracting licensure. She relayed personal experience of
building her own home and stated that its common practice
for people living in rural areas to construct their own
home. She noted that according to existing statute an
owner-builder was allowed to sell their home after two
years.
DANIEL BELLERIVE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE CATHY TILTON,
reviewed the sectional analysis (copy on file) for the
committee substitute (CS). He read the analysis from a
prepared document:
Section 1(Page 1,lines 3-8) - Section 1adds a new
section stating that the intent of this bill is not to
limit the freedom and ability of a person to construct
or sell their own home.
Section 2 (Page 1,lines 9-15) - Section 2 adds a new
subsection directing that the department shall
investigate and take action if the notice and
circumstances of a sale under AS 08.18.161(11)
indicate that the owner is operating a business that
requires them to register as a contractor under this
chapter.
Section 3 (Page line 1through Page line 11) -
Section 3 accomplishes three things.
1. Page 2, lines 23-25 adds clarification explicitly
stating that AS 08.18.161(9) refers to existing
structures.
2. Page 2, lines 30 and 31 expand the exemption in
AS 08.18.161(11) to include owners acting as their own
contractor, as well as hired workers or
subcontractors. Previously this exemption strictly
applied to workers hired on an hourly basis.
3. Page 3, lines 3-7 add a requirement for an owner-
builder to provide notification if they advertise or
sell their home build under AS 08.18.161(11) before
the two year period in statute.
Section 4 clarifies that for the purposes of this
section, construction begins when the owner begins the
actual construction work or enters into an agreement
labor, act as a subcontractor, or provide materials
for the construction.
3:18:02 PM
Representative Gattis wanted clarification about when
construction ended. She wondered whether an owner-builder
could sell their house if it was not completed and the
owner discontinued construction. Mr. Bellerive replied that
regardless of the level of completeness if the construction
was ceased then the period of construction was over and the
owner could sell the house. Representative Gattis asked
whether the owner had to fill out a form or notify
government in order to sell the unfinished house. Mr.
Bellerive responded in the negative.
Representative Guttenberg referenced the two year period
provision and wanted to know the legal definition of the
period of construction.
Mr. Bellerive answered that a specific definition for a
period of construction did not exist in statute. He
indicated that the two year period referred to the two year
period after the construction ended. He added that
regardless of the level of completion the house could be
sold two years after construction had ceased.
Representative Guttenberg referred to page 3, line 5, the
words, "…on forms provided by the department." He wondered
how the home builder found out that a form had to be filled
out in order to sell the house, especially if the owner was
not using a bank or realtor. He asked how the state was
going to monitor owner-built house sales by owner.
Mr. Bellerive replied that an owner-builder living in the
house would qualify for exemption 9 and was further
protected from any obligation to submit notice. He cited
page 2, line 23 and read the following:
(9) [(10)] a person working on and existing structure
on that person's own property, whether occupied by the
person or not, and a person working on that person's
own existing residence, whether owned by the person or
not…
Mr. Bellerive detailed that the definition of a residence
was "an existing home being a residence previously occupied
as a residence." Regardless of what the subjective view of
a completed home was, if the owner-builder was claiming the
house as a residence exemption 9 applied instead of
exemption 11.
Representative Guttenberg was still unclear about what the
difference was between exemption 9 and exemption 11. He
read page 3, lines 3 through 5:
…an owner who advertises the structure under
construction for sale or sells the structure during
the period of construction or within two years after
the period of construction ends shall file, on forms
provided by the department…
Co-Chair Thompson voiced that the bill was not moving out
of committee today and he would help provide clarity at a
later date.
3:23:40 PM
Representative Kawasaki referred to the new language under
exemption 11. He deduced that the language seemed to place
the obligation on the person selling the house to obtain
the forms. He was uncertain about "the effect" of the
language. Mr. Bellerive deferred to the department.
Representative Gara surmised that the provision only
applied to an owner-builder and not someone assisting with
the construction. He asked for confirmation. Representative
Tilton confirmed the statement was correct.
Representative Gara provided a scenario where someone build
a cabin and occupied it unfinished for a period of over 10
years then finally completed construction and sold it after
two years. He wondered how that was allowed under the bill.
Mr. Bellerive commented that in the particular scenario the
only requirement for the owner would be to notify the
department. He reported that the department did not have
the authority to prohibit someone from selling their own
property and emphasized the use of the word notify, since
permission was not required. The notification ensured that
the sale was not viewed as a business transaction.
HB 81 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
3:27:08 PM
Co-Chair Thompson reviewed the agenda for the following
morning meeting.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 176 WorkDraft CS.PDF |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 100 Agrium.docx |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 100 Support McGrath.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 100 Letter of Support-Furie.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 176 NEW FN LEG.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB176-Judiciary-4-01-15.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 176 |
| HB 100 CS WORKDRAFT FIN VERSION G.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB81 Draft Proposed CS ver E.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| HB 155 NEW HFIN FN 40915.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 155 |
| HB 100 Amendment 1 Gara.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 100 |
| HB 155 CS WORKDRAFT N version.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 155 |
| HB 155 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 155 |
| HB 155 Version Changes H-N.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 155 |
| HB 100 Cook Inlet Assumptions.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 100 |