Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/23/1999 10:50 AM Senate RLS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CHAIRMAN KELLY announced a proposed Senate Rules Committee
substitute had been prepared for HB 80.
CHRIS NELSON, Staff Director to the Joint Committee on Military
Bases, discussed the two changes made to the proposed committee
substitute. The first change increases, from three to five, the
number of preference points for hiring at the request of request of
the Administration through the Department of Military and Veterans
Affairs. That increase will place National Guard members on an
equal status with veterans who have served during periods of
conflict, and because the Department of Administration expressed
concern that creating too many categories in the point system could
complicate the hiring process. A ten point preference already
exists for disabled veterans and prisoners of war. MR. NELSON
informed committee members he has not received any objections to
this change from any of the veterans groups and that overall
support has been bipartisan.
CHAIRMAN KELLY stated that change is also favored by Pat Pourchot,
Legislative Director in the Office of the Governor.
MR. NELSON explained the second revision provides an employment
preference, consistent with the collective bargaining agreements,
in the event of layoffs. This revision grants the same employment
preference to National Guard members as that currently provided to
disabled veterans, prisoners of war and veterans, in the event that
layoffs occur. Public employee bargaining unit representatives
were concerned about seniority. Some of their suggestions were
adopted and those representatives have agreed to the changes made
in the bill. The actual language change begins on line 18, and
reads, "If all job qualifications are equal, a member of the
National Guard shall be given preference over a person who is not
a veteran, prisoner of war, or member of the National Guard."
CHAIRMAN KELLY clarified that language draws a middle line between
changes made by a House committee and what the bargaining units
wanted to see.
MR. NELSON explained that placing hiring preferences in statute
raises the question of whether the prerogatives of the bargaining
unit are being preempted. The addition of this language was
considered to be a middle ground because it requires that all
factors be considered equally.
Number 181
SENATOR ELLIS questioned whether veterans and prisoners of war have
preference over members of the National Guard. MR. NELSON said
that is how he reads the bill. The groups are listed in the bill
in priority and veterans and prisoners of war have a 10 point
preference.
SENATOR ELLIS asked if the bill creates a hierarchy of preferences
with prisoners of war at the top of the list. MR. NELSON said that
is correct.
CHAIRMAN KELLY noted the available pool of veterans and prisoners
of war in the job market is rapidly diminishing.
SENATOR ELLIS asked if the bill in any way interferes with the
existing hierarchy of military people for the purpose of hiring
preferences.
MR. NELSON said it does not.
SENATOR LEMAN said he reads the bill to change the hierarchy a
little bit because it provides a preference equal to the five
points added for the passing grade of a veteran. MR. NELSON agreed
it changes the hierarchy on the hiring but the bill makes two
changes. It gives a competitive advantage during the hiring
process and recognizes that in the event of a layoff, they also
have a preference.
CHAIRMAN KELLY stated that because the bargaining unit is concerned
that wholesale layoffs will occur, it wanted to place the seniority
issue in statute. He felt that would interfere with the collective
bargaining process because the seniority issue is included in most
collective bargaining agreements.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to adopt SCSHB 80(RLS). There being no
objection, the motion carried.
SENATOR LEMAN moved to calendar HB 80-EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE FOR
NAT'L GUARD. There being no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|