Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
02/23/2021 10:00 AM House FISHERIES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB79 | |
| HB80 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 79 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 80 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 80-SPT FSH HATCHERY FACIL ACCT; SURCHARGE
11:46:03 AM
CHAIR STUTES announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 80 "An Act establishing the sport fishing
hatchery facilities account; establishing the sport fishing
facility surcharge; and providing for an effective date."
11:46:17 AM
CHAIR STUTES made introductory remarks on HB 80 on behalf of the
prime sponsor [House Rules by request of the governor], noting
that the bill is the Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G's)
top legislative priority and had been introduced during the
previous legislative session and was not passed due to COVID-19.
She stated that, because the bill did not pass the previous
session, the sport fishing hatchery surcharge had been allowed
to sunset and millions of dollars of revenue was not collected
by the department. She urged quick action by the committee.
11:47:07 AM
DAVID RUTZ, Director, Division of Sport Fish, Alaska Department
of Fish & Game, stated that HB 80 is a governor's bill that the
Department supports, and it is one of the department's
legislative priorities this session. He reviewed that in 2005
the legislature approved a bond measure to construct two sport
fish hatcheries: the William Jack Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery
in Anchorage and the Ruth Burnett Sport Fish Hatchery in
Fairbanks. In order to receive the bond, ADF&G crafted a
repayment plan that was unprecedented. A surcharge was added to
sport fishing licenses, nearly all of which went directly to
repayment of the bond, less $500 thousand, which went to
Southeast Alaska annually for hatchery production, since this
area was not serviced by the two bonded hatcheries. He noted
that fishermen paid the surcharge without much complaint. No
general fund dollars were used to pay back the bonds; sport
angler dollars matched by federal [Dingle-Johnson funds] paid
the bill. The combined enhancement program that the surcharge
funded contributes approximately $50 million to the economy of
the state. This unique plan worked so well that the department
paid this bond back five years early, in calendar year 2020. As
a result, the surcharge and all associated statutes sunsetted on
December 31, 2020.
MR. RUTZ relayed that upon the repayment of bond debt, there was
an immediate $500 thousand funding impact to Southeast Alaska
from loss of the surcharge income, which funds the raising and
releasing of over 1.4 million Chinook salmon and hundreds of
thousands of coho salmon smolt at release sites targeted to
benefit sport anglers in Southeast inside waters. He explained
that losing this level of funding to support existing
enhancement activities is detrimental to Southeast Alaska sport
anglers and charter operators already highly impacted by the
lack of out-of-state travelers due to COVID-19 travel
restrictions.
MR. RUTZ directed attention to a fact sheet included in the
committee packet, which shows that the overall sport fish
enhancement program releases nearly 7.2 million fish into nearly
270 locations statewide annually, which is in addition to the
1.4 million in Southeast and provides thousands of anglers with
additional fishing opportunities, as well as provides a large
economic boost to Southeast businesses.
MR. RUTZ said that when the Ruth Burnett and William Jack
Hernandez Sport Fish Hatcheries came online, nearly $5 million
of Dingell-Johnson funds had to be redirected in order to pay
for their operations and maintenance. Any needed repairs and
maintenance to date have come from existing operating budget
funds and usually have been done at the expense of other
division needs. He said there have been several larger, more
expensive needs that were deferred during construction and have
yet to be addressed. He cautioned that as the facilities age,
the maintenance needs will grow, which will likely put further
undue burden onto existing programs. He advised that having the
ability to tap into a source of funds to cover these needs would
allow the division to sustain existing enhanced production
without [negative] impacts elsewhere.
11:51:31 AM
MR. RUTZ said that with these ongoing maintenance obligations
and the loss of a substantial amount of revenue to support sport
fish enhancement in Southeast Alaska, the department worked with
groups across Alaska to propose a new plan to reinstate a
reduced surcharge. The reduction to the previously collected $9
surcharge was $5 across the board. He explained that this left
residents with a $4 surcharge and nonresidents contributing the
lion's share, over 6 times what residents contribute. The
proposed surcharge is a 60 percent reduction for residents and
overall a 34 percent decrease from the original surcharge fee.
He added that "this surcharge has been in place for about a
decade and a half." He noted that a license fee breakdown was
available in the committee packet.
MR. RUTZ stated, "The department proposes again to collect that
surcharge and deposit it into a separate subaccount within the
fish and game fund to be accounted for and used only for the
maintenance and operations of the state's sport fish hatcheries
sport fish enhancement in Southeast Alaska." He said there was,
on average, $6.4 million generated in revenue from surcharge
collections on sport fish licenses. The reduction in surcharge
would net the division approximately $4 million per calendar
year. The division currently allocates $7 million to
enhancement-related activity projects, with most tied to the
operation and maintenance of the 2 large facilities in Fairbanks
and Anchorage.
MR. RUTZ concluded his remarks by stating that the establishment
of this new reduced enhancement surcharge would cover most of
the existing costs allocated toward the enhancement programs.
Further, it would address deferred equipment and maintenance
needs and ensure contingency funds are available for unforeseen
events at these facilities without having to request
supplemental funds from the legislature or, worst case, shut
down the facilities. He noted that this legislation, through a
previous bill, had been introduced in 2019, to be heard during
the Thirty-First Alaska State Legislature, but with the pandemic
in full swing unfortunately was not meant to be.
11:55:50 AM
CHAIR STUTES stated that the surcharge had been in existence for
some time prior to the sunset, and the department is currently
requesting only a portion of the surcharge be reinstated. She
postulated that if the entire surcharge were to be reinstated,
then the department would collect an estimated $2 million in
additional revenue than the current proposed legislation would
provide. She added that the department has well-known budget
shortages, and that 82 percent of the revenue is collected from
nonresident anglers. She asked the department to explain why
only a portion of the surcharge is requested to be reinstated.
MR. RUTZ explained that in 2005, the department had conveyed its
intention that the surcharge would be eliminated once the bonds
had been fully repaid. He stated his intention on behalf of the
department that it should not appear [to the industry] to be
greedy.
11:57:51 AM
CHAIR STUTES stated that things have changed since 2005 and,
during the previous legislative session, the proposed
legislation had been amended to include additional surcharge to
be collected. She expressed her concern that HB 80 does not
request sufficient revenue to cover the program.
11:58:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE stated his support for the hatchery
program and requested that the department provide a cost
breakdown by facility for deferred maintenance that had been
referred to in testimony.
11:59:50 AM
MR. RUTZ directed attention to a cost breakdown included in the
committee packet. He estimated that $5 million of sportfish
funds had been spent on the program, with $3.4 million for the
William Jack Hatchery and $2 million for the Ruth Barnett
Hatchery. He stated that cost overruns during the construction
of the hatcheries had resulted in incomplete construction and
deferred costs. He gave examples of maintenance items that
included wells, disinfection units for production modules, new
trucks, and completion of visitor center facilities.
12:01:56 PM
CHAIR STUTES pointed out that the committee packet contained
itemized costs for projects and requested the department provide
a cost estimate breakdown by facility.
MR. RUTZ agreed to provide the requested information to the
committee.
12:02:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked for the department to provide a
formula or revenue analysis depicting how the surcharge revenue
proposed would be allocated according to the facility cost
breakdown that the department had agreed to provide. She asked
for the department to also provide a breakdown of economic
development and impact to the state from the hatchery program.
12:03:16 PM
CHAIR STUTES stated her intention to offer a future committee
substitute to HB 80.
CHAIR STUTES announced HB 80 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 79 Transmittal Letter 1.28.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM SFIN 4/27/2022 9:00:00 AM |
HB 79 |
| HB 79 v. A 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 79 |
| HB 80 Fiscal Note #1 ADF&G 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Hearing Request Memo 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Sectional Analysis - ver. A 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Doc - Surcharge Revenue Breakdown 1.27.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Document ADF&G Stocking FAQ 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-Alaska Salmon Hatchery Operators 2.21.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Transmittal Letter 1.28.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 v A 2.18.21.PDF |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 79 Fiscal Note #1 ADF&G 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 79 |
| HB 79 Hearing Request Memo 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 79 |
| HB 79 Sectional Analysis 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 79 |
| HB 79 Support Doc - Logbook Use Summary 2.18.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM |
HB 79 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-SEAFA 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter-UFA 2.22.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |
| HB 80 Support Letter ATA 2.23.21.pdf |
HFSH 2/23/2021 10:00:00 AM HFSH 3/4/2021 11:00:00 AM HFSH 3/9/2021 11:00:00 AM |
HB 80 |