Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
04/22/2019 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB102 | |
| SB29 | |
| SB36 | |
| HB78 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 102 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 78 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 78-INSURER & GROUP INSURANCE DISCLOSURE
3:49:45 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 78, "An Act relating to insurance; relating to
an insurer's corporate annual disclosure; relating to insurance
company holding systems; and providing for an effective date."
3:50:04 PM
LORI WING-HEIER, Director, Division of Insurance, Department of
Commerce, Community & Economic Development, introduced HB 78 and
related its history. The bill will make changes to the
insurance code that conform to changes in model laws adopted by
the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and
will assist the state in maintaining its accredited status with
the NAIC and improve uniformity nationwide in the regulation of
insurance. She noted that HB 78 has two components regarding
corporate governance and holding companies.
3:52:22 PM
MS. WING-HEIER began the sectional analysis [included in the
committee packet] of HB 78. She addressed section 1, which adds
new sections to AS 21.09 and requests an annual disclosure of
corporate governance from insurance companies to ensure that
their policies and procedures comply with statute.
3:52:58 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked what corporate governance is.
MS. WING-HEIER stated that, in this case, it establishes that
the board knows the actions of upper management and is cognizant
of what is taking place in that entity.
3:54:06 PM
MS. WING-HEIER turned attention to section 1 and detailed the
annual disclosure requirement. She read the following from the
sectional analysis [original punctuation provided]:
AS 21.09.332. Disclosure requirement
• Subsection (a) requires insurers (the term
"insurer" and "insurers" includes insurance
groups) to submit to the director by June 1 of
each calendar year a corporate governance annual
disclosure, and, if the insurer is a member of an
insurer group, to the lead state regulator of the
insurance group.
• Subsection (b) requires the disclosure to be
signed by the CEO or corporate secretary
indicating the insurer has implemented the
corporate governance practices required under the
disclosure provisions and that the disclosure has
been provided to the insurer's board of directors
or to the appropriate committee of the board.
• Subsection (c) provides the director may require
an insurer to submit a disclosure if the insurer
is not already required to do so under (a) of
this section.
• Subsection (d) details the levels of corporate
governance at which the insurer may provide the
information regarding its disclosure.
• Subsection (e) encourages the insurer to make
its disclosure at a level based on specified
criteria. If the insurer utilizes the criteria
the entity must so indicate to the director and
must also explain any subsequent change in the
level of reporting.
• Subsection (f) provides that disclosures are to
be reviewed and any requests for information are
to be made through the lead state in accordance
with the most recent NAIC Financial Analysis
Handbook.
• Subsection (g) allows an insurer to reference
other documents provided to the director
containing information required in the disclosure
without having to duplicate the information in
the disclosure provided the disclosure provides
for a cross-reference of the document in which
the information is included.
MS. WING-HEIER continued by saying that AS 21.09.334 will
authorize the director to adopt regulations and orders; AS
21.09.336 will set out the contents of the corporate governance
annual disclosure; and AS 21.09.338 will provide for
confidentiality.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX questioned whether this was a recent concept
from the NAIC.
MS. WING-HEIER said it has been around for four to five years,
adding that all states are required to adopt this by January 1,
2020 to keep accreditation.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX inquired as to the timing of it being brought to
the committee. She asked why now instead of last year.
MS. WING-HEIER explained that last legislature, the bill was
introduced as a four-part accreditation bill. At that time, she
said, the committee requested that sections three and four be
eliminated in order to pass sections one and two because there
was already a considerable amount of time spent on the first
part of the bill.
3:57:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS asked what the real-world impact would be
if HB 78 did not pass.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that the NAIC could put the state on a
probation.
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS questioned whether it could potentially
force Alaska-based insurers to domicile elsewhere.
MS. WING-HEIER answered yes. She explained that one of the
purposes of having all states conform to similar legislation and
having accreditation is that insurance companies domiciled in
Alaska can pay to have the state do an examination and then they
would be accredited to transact insurance in other states.
3:58:49 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL sought clarification on accreditation.
MS. WING-HEIER confirmed that Alaska is accredited. She
explained that every 5 years Alaska submits to the NAIC who
brings outside consultants to look at the state's statutes and
regulations, as well as the Division of Insurance's staff and
credentialing. She noted that the NAIC ultimately ranks the
state as passing or failing, adding that in 2017 Alaska passed
"with flying colors."
CO-CHAIR WOOL asked how the state's accreditation affects the
ability of Alaska insurance companies to conduct business
elsewhere.
MS. WING-HEIER conveyed that when the state is accredited, the
state's work is accepted by the other 49 states and the District
of Columbia. She pointed out that if Alaska loses
accreditation, each state must show that Alaska's insurance
companies are meeting all the financial solvency requirements
that they have adopted.
4:01:04 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked if it is necessary to adopt the exact same
language as the NAIC's model, or if there is any leeway.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that accreditation must be the model law
or substantially similar.
4:02:34 PM
MS. WING-HEIER returned to the sectional analysis. She directed
attention to AS 21.09.340, which establishes the penalties for
an insurer that fails to comply. She continued to section 2,
which amends AS 21.22.0859(a) to apply the requirements of the
section to transactions that occurred the previous December 31
rather than the current year. The change is necessary as the
director would not have all the information necessary to
calculate the transaction given the timing of when an insurer is
required to provide information to the director for review.
4:04:38 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked why the current year is less meaningful
than the past year.
MS. WING-HEIER stated that prior year shows the impact on 12
months of business as opposed to three or four months.
4:05:40 PM
MS. WING-HEIER directed attention to section 3, which amends AS
21.22.1209(a) to allow for confidentiality. Section 4 adds new
subsections to AS 21.22.120 to clarify that the director, staff,
or the NAIC could not release confidential information.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX questioned whether the information could be
shared if it was subpoenaed.
MS. WING-HEIER said she understood that to be correct.
4:07:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN inquired as to the current regulations
regarding confidential information that was subpoenaed.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that the current statutes already require
holding the documents confidentially. What they don't clarify
is that the holding company would be subject to the same
confidentiality as the companies that are underneath it.
4:09:31 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked what would happen under current law, if a
subpoena was issued for information from a holding company.
MS. WING-HEIER stated that her attorneys would argue that AS
21.09.06 would extend to that case.
4:10:35 PM
MS. WING-HEIER addressed section 5, which adds new sections to
AS 21.22 regarding group-wide supervision of internationally
active insurance groups. She noted that there are no
international companies domiciled in Alaska; nonetheless, this
is part of the model law Alaska must adopt. Section 6 adds two
definitions for an "internationally active insurance company"
and a "group-wide supervisor" to AS 21.22.200. Section 7 allows
the director to adopt regulations necessary to implement this
bill and section 8 provides for an effective date.
4:12:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN sought clarification on the aforementioned
status report that is submitted every June.
MS. WING-HEIER acknowledged that every June the division files a
status report on any bills that impact accreditation, as well as
the status on examinations.
4:13:26 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL announced that HB 78 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB36 BON Sunset vsn A.PDF |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Sponsor Statement 1-28-19.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Fiscal Note DCCED-DCBPL 2-8-19.PDF |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Supporting Document BON Roster 3-29-19.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/24/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Supporting Document DCCED CBPL Responses to SFIN 3-11-19.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Supporting Document BON Audit April 2017.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Bundled Letters of Support.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/24/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| SB36 Supporting Document BON Audit Summary 08-20113-18.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 36 |
| HB078 ver A 3.8.19.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 78 |
| HB078 Sponsor Statement 3.4.2019.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 78 |
| HB078 Sectional Analysis ver A 3.8.19.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 78 |
| HB078 Fiscal Note DCCED-DOI 3.4.19.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 78 |
| LT House Labor & Commerce - HB78 - Corp Gov, Holding Co.PDF |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 78 |
| SB 29 Version A.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/24/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 29 |
| SB 29 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/24/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 29 |
| SB 29 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/24/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 29 |
| SB 29 Board of Marine Pilots Audit.pdf |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/24/2019 3:15:00 PM |
SB 29 |
| HB 102.Bill Version U.pdf |
HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| 2019.HB102.Sponsor Statement.docx |
HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| 2019.HB102.Sectional.docx |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Fiscal Note DOR.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Fiscal Note DOL.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Backup Letter of Opposition Drift.docx |
HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102.Backup Opposition Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.pdf |
HL&C 4/3/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/8/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 4/22/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 102 |