Legislature(2015 - 2016)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/15/2015 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing: Commission on Judicial Conduct | |
| HB11 | |
| HB15 | |
| HB75 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 75 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 15 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 75-MARIJUANA REG;CLUBS;MUNIS;LOCAL OPT ELECT
2:49:58 PM
VICE CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of HB 75. "An Act
relating to the registration of marijuana establishments by
municipalities; relating to the definition of 'marijuana';
clarifying standards for personal use of marijuana by persons 21
years of age or older; prohibiting the public consumption of
marijuana; authorizing the registration of marijuana clubs;
relating to established villages and to local option elections
regarding the operation of marijuana establishments; and
providing for an effective date."
2:50:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CATHY TILTON, sponsor of HB 75, described HB 75
as a guidebook for municipalities as they put ordinances
together [to regulate marijuana clubs]. She deferred to her
staff to discuss the substantive parts of the bill.
HEATH HILYARD, Staff, Representative Cathy Tilton, said he would
speak to the comprehensive Senate Judiciary committee substitute
on Friday and today he would describe the policy components.
· Page 2, line 21, has a household limit of 24 marijuana
plants.
· It clarifies what aiding and supporting any activities for
personal use of marijuana constitutes.
· It provides that established villages may hold local
elections to opt out of commercial marijuana activities.
· Several sections clarify that municipalities may use their
own ordinances in some of the decision making situations if
they have a version of the Administrative Procedures Act
similar to AS 44.62.
· Page 6, lines 2-3, stipulates that municipalities that
currently have the power to establish civil and criminal
penalties related to alcohol also have the power to
establish civil and criminal penalties for marijuana
violations of commercial establishments only with regard to
time, place, and manner. This is consistent with Title 4.
· It provides the local option for established villages that
is modified based on Title 4 as it currently exists.
· It includes the establishment of marijuana clubs at the
request of several municipalities.
· A provision on page 10, line 20, allows the supreme court
to establish a bail schedule that does not require a court
appearance.
· Page 11 provides important definitions. In particular the
term "manufacture" has the meaning given in AS 11.71.900,
which stipulates that grow for personal use is not
considered manufacture. The definition of "marijuana club"
stipulates that it is not considered a public place, and
public place is given a definition.
VICE CHAIR COGHILL shared that he was not a fan of marijuana
clubs because of the question of determining inebriation.
MR. HILYARD responded that marijuana club is loosely based on
what a bottle club in under Title 4. He said this was in
response to request from municipalities, but it's a policy call
for this committee.
2:58:14 PM
VICE CHAIR COGHILL held HB 75 in committee for further
consideration.