Legislature(2013 - 2014)CAPITOL 120
02/18/2013 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB1 | |
| HB69 | |
| HB73 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 69 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 73 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 73 - CRIMES; VICTIMS; CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT
1:56:11 PM
CHAIR KELLER [announced that the final order of business would
be] HOUSE BILL NO. 73, "An Act relating to the commencement of
actions for felony sex trafficking and felony human trafficking;
relating to the crime of sexual assault; relating to the crime
of unlawful contact; relating to forfeiture for certain crimes
involving prostitution; relating to the time in which to
commence certain prosecutions; relating to release for violation
of a condition of release in connection with a crime involving
domestic violence; relating to interception of private
communications for certain sex trafficking or human trafficking
offenses; relating to use of evidence of sexual conduct
concerning victims of certain crimes; relating to procedures for
granting immunity to a witness in a criminal proceeding;
relating to consideration at sentencing of the effect of a crime
on the victim; relating to the time to make an application for
credit for time served in detention in a treatment program or
while in other custody; relating to suspending imposition of
sentence for sex trafficking; relating to consecutive sentences
for convictions of certain crimes involving child pornography or
indecent materials to minors; relating to the referral of sexual
felonies to a three-judge panel; relating to the definition of
'sexual felony' for sentencing and probation for conviction of
certain crimes; relating to the definition of "sex offense"
regarding sex offender registration; relating to protective
orders for stalking and sexual assault and for a crime involving
domestic violence; relating to the definition of 'victim
counseling centers' for disclosure of certain communications
concerning sexual assault or domestic violence; relating to
violent crimes compensation; relating to certain information in
retention election of judges concerning sentencing of persons
convicted of felonies; relating to remission of sentences for
certain sexual felony offenders; relating to the subpoena power
of the attorney general in cases involving the use of an
Internet service account; relating to reasonable efforts in
child-in-need-of-aid cases involving sexual abuse or sex
offender registration; relating to mandatory reporting by
athletic coaches of child abuse or neglect; making conforming
amendments; amending Rules 16, 32.1(b)(1), and 32.2(a), Alaska
Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 404(b), Alaska Rules of
Evidence, and Rule 216, Alaska Rules of Appellate Procedure; and
providing for an effective date."
1:56:37 PM
RICHARD SVOBODNY, Deputy Attorney General, Central Office,
Criminal Division, Department of Law (DOL), relayed that he
would be addressing issues raised during the last two hearings
on HB 73. With regard to Sections 1 and 20-21 of HB 73 - which
would reverse the Alaska Court of Appeals decision in Collins v.
State, 287 P.3d 791 (Alaska App. 2012), wherein for purposes of
sentencing a person convicted of a felony sex offense, the
court, based on a 2006 legislative letter of intent accompanying
legislation increasing the presumptive sentencing ranges for
felony sex offenses, misinterpreted the legislature's intent and
instead established non-statutory mitigating factors that
resulted in the perpetrator, under standards different than
those used for other felony crimes, going before a three-judge
panel for sentencing - he explained that the Alaska Supreme
Court has since agreed to review the Alaska Court of Appeals'
decision in Collins. Sections 1 and 20-21, as currently worded,
would ensure that the legislature's intent is followed in the
meantime.
MR. SVOBODNY, with regard to Section 13 of HB 73 - excluding
evidence of a sex-offense victim's sexual conduct occurring
either before or after the offense took place, limiting when a
defendant may apply to have such evidence admitted regardless to
not later than five days before trial, and providing an
exception to that limitation if the request is based on evidence
admitted at trial that was not available to the defendant before
trial - explained that this provision would ensure that the sex-
offense victim has been given a fair opportunity beforehand to
prepare for the disclosure of such evidence during trial if the
court chooses to allow it. In response to comments and
questions, he acknowledged that Section 13 would result in an
indirect court rule change, and mentioned that a change is being
made to the Senate companion bill in order to address a concern
that such evidence [could be made available to the defendant
before the trial but after the five-day deadline has passed].
No longer does the court give instruction to the jury that a
rape victim's history of promiscuity ought to be taken into
account when determining whether to convict the perpetrator, but
it was just such commonly-given instruction that has since
resulted in the establishment of certain protections
specifically for sex-offense victims.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX expressed disfavor with Section 13's
proposed changes.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT indicated favor with Section 13's
proposed changes.
2:33:51 PM
MR. SVOBODNY, with regard to Section 36 of HB 73 - expanding the
list of circumstances for which the court may determine that
reasonable efforts to reunite a child with his/her family need
not be taken by the Office of Children's Services (OCS), to
include circumstances wherein the court has found by clear and
convincing evidence that the parent or guardian has committed
sexual abuse against that child or against any of his/her other
children, or is registered or required to register as a sex
offender - explained that for purposes of receiving certain
federal funding, such a provision must now be included in
statute. In response to comments and a question, he indicated
that he would research whether any other circumstances should be
added to the list being expanded by Section 36, and offered his
understanding that all but one of the sex offenses for which
someone must register as a sex offender are felony-level
offenses.
MR. SVOBODNY, with regard to Sections 14-15 and 43-44 of HB 73 -
changing the procedure used when determining whether a witness
in a criminal prosecution is entitled to transactional immunity
under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, such that
the judge would be required to speak with the witness about
his/her testimony before deciding whether to grant the immunity,
and be required to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law
in a sealed written order, and the state would be allowed to
appeal the judge's decision - explained that these provisions
are intended to correct problems that have arisen as a result of
how some judges and defense attorneys have been approaching the
issue of transactional immunity. Some judges have been
threatening to dismiss the underlying criminal case when the
attorney general chooses not to grant a particular witness
transactional immunity, and some defense attorneys in domestic
violence cases have improperly raised the issue of transactional
immunity and then purposely disclosed a witness's confidential
information. In response to comments and questions, he
indicated that the DOL views the changes proposed by
Sections 14-15 and 43-44 as the best approach to address such
problems.
[HB 73 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB1 Sponsor Statement (rev).pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 ver O.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB 1 Version A.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| Fiscal Note CSHB 1 (STA).pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB 1 Supporting Documents AK Association of Chiefs of Police Support.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| CSHB 01 (STA) ACLU Review Const'l Issues.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Citizen Letter of Opposition.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Supporting Documents - FAQ Sheet.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| HB1 Witness List HJUD.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 1 |
| CSHB 69 ver O.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 69 |
| HB 69-Pittman Wildlife Restoration.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 69 |
| HB 69 Support--City of Wasilla.pdf |
HJUD 2/18/2013 1:00:00 PM |
HB 69 |