Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
03/08/2018 03:15 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SCR10 | |
| HB71 | |
| HB400 | |
| HJR38 | |
| HB310 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SCR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 400 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HJR 38 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 310 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 71-NO ST. EMPLOYEE PAY INCREASE FOR 2 YRS
3:24:01 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 71, "An Act relating to compensation,
merit increases, and pay increments for certain public
officials, officers, and employees not covered by collective
bargaining agreements; and providing for an effective date."
3:24:18 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 3:24 p.m.
3:24:59 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS referred to the forthcoming committee
substitute (CS) for HB 71, [labeled 30-GH1018\O, Wayne, 2/28/18,
and referred to as "Version O"].
3:25:21 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 3:25 p.m.
3:25:48 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS requested a synopsis of Version O from the
Department of Administration (DOA) staff.
3:26:09 PM
LESLIE RIDLE, Commissioner Designee, Department of
Administration (DOA), commented that the changes to HB 71
resulted from collaboration between DOA and the House State
Affairs Standing Committee.
3:26:43 PM
KATE SHEEHAN, Director, Division of Personnel and Labor
Relations (DPLR), Department of Administration (DOA),
paraphrased from the document, entitled "CS HB 71 Explanation of
Changes," included in the committee packet, which read as
follows:
Section 1: Modified from original bill. This section
maintains that the Governor may waive a portion of his
annual salary but no longer restricts the waiver
during the period of July 1, 2017 through June 30,
2019.
Section 2: New section. Removes language that
temporary salary schedules do not affect salaries of
employees in a bargaining unit represented by a labor
union established under the Public Employment
Relations Act and adds the term "pay period" to the
title. Language that was removed is now found in
section 3 of the bill.
Section 3: New section. Allows the Director of the
Division of Personnel to establish a two-week pay
period for biweekly payment of a monthly salary. It
sets forth the manner in which the Director shall
determine the amount paid biweekly. Recognizes that
this section does not apply to employees in a
bargaining unit represented by a labor union
established under the Public Employment Relations Act.
MS. SHEEHAN added that currently the pay period is semi-monthly,
and the hours are variable; under the biweekly pay period the
hours would be consistent at 75 hours per every two weeks. She
referred to Section 3(b)(1)-(5) [page 2, lines 8-19, of Version
O] and explained that the five paragraphs in the section show
the calculations for figuring the hourly, daily, and biweekly
rates.
3:29:05 PM
MS. SHEEHAN referred to Section 3(c) [page 2, lines 20-22] to
point out the language removed from Section 2 and put into
Section 3. It states that Section 3 would not apply to
employees covered by collective bargaining agreements; their pay
periods would be subject to negotiated bargaining agreements.
MS. SHEEHAN referred to Section 4 [page 2, lines 23-27] and
stated that it is a new section which clarifies that the
proposed legislation would expressly modify pay provisions
applicable to the governor. She explained that this is included
because by statute, legislation is needed to expressly provide
for the change in salary.
MS. SHEEHAN relayed that Sections 5-7 address effective dates:
Section 5 states that the governor's ability to waive some of
his salary would be retroactive to January 1, 2018; Section 6
states that Sections 1, 4, and 5 would take effective
immediately; and Section 7 states that Sections 2 and 3 would be
effective July 1, 2018.
3:30:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether Section 1(b) of Version O
[page 1, lines 6-8] has anything to do with the deductibility of
charitable contributions under federal tax law.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE asked for clarification of the question.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX explained that her question is: If the
governor does not want to take part of his salary, why wouldn't
he write a check back to the State of Alaska? Why is a law
necessary unless he wished to take a charitable donation
deduction for federal tax purposes?
COMMISSIONER RIDLE answered that under Version O, the portion of
salary that the governor does not receive would not be
considered a charitable donation for tax purposes; the intent of
Version O is to preclude the governor from paying federal tax on
money he will not receive. She said that if the governor writes
a check back to the state, it would be necessary for him to pay
taxes on it, because it would be paid salary. She opined that
she doubts that the money could be considered a charitable
donation.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX relayed that she wanted to clarify that
the proposed legislation was regarding federal tax law.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS restated that the governor would be liable
for paying tax on his entire salary even if he writes a check
back to the state for the portion of the salary he does not
choose to take.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE responded, that's correct. Under Version O,
he would accept the smaller amount and not have to write a check
back to the state for the balance and, therefore, not be
required to pay taxes on salary he did not receive.
3:32:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked, "What happened to the bill I
actually kind of liked which had to do with ... freezes for
unrepresented employees?" He maintained that the original
version of HB 71 would have accomplished that. He stated that
he attempted to make a motion on the House floor to enact the
cost savings that would have been realized by a freeze, and this
version represents a significant change from the original
version.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked whether his interpretation of Version
O is correct: the governor wants to avoid being taxed on his
income, and Version O would permit the employer - the state - to
waive that portion of his salary as income.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE replied that Version O was not introduced
because the governor does not want to pay taxes; the dates have
been removed so that the provision could apply to any governor.
Version O would remove the necessity to pay taxes on money that
the governor is not keeping; if the governor receives the salary
then returns it, he would have to pay taxes on it.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asserted that he finds it ironic that an
administration that has been working to impose income taxes on
working Alaskans is advancing legislation that would permit the
governor of that administration to avoid federal income taxes on
his pay. He said that most people who want to make charitable
donations, receive the pay, then write a check to their church
or charity of choice. He maintained that if the governor
chooses to redirect his compensation to a charity of his choice
- the State of Alaska or any other - he is permitted to do that
currently. He expressed his dissatisfaction with the changes in
HB 71, which was intended to freeze salaries to unrepresented
state employees, and now is a federal tax avoidance measure for
the governor.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE answered that the original version of HB 71
had the same provision for the governor's salary as does Version
O; the only difference is the elimination of dates restricting
the waiver to a certain period. She maintained that the
governor is not trying to avoid paying income tax, but rather
does not want to take a full salary. He or any governor who
wishes to take advantage of this provision, will pay income tax
on all the salary he/she receives. The intent is for the
governor to be able to reduce his/her salary.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE conceded that the portion of HB 71, which
called for pay freezes for state employees, was removed from the
proposed legislation. She maintained that DOA has not been
successful in negotiating such a provision with any of the
bargaining units. She added that even with that elimination,
Version O retains the provision addressing the governor reducing
his/her salary and adds the new section - transitioning to
biweekly pay - which is something that the unions and employees
have requested for quite some time. It is a more efficient
system for payroll.
3:37:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH stated that he agrees with the provision
simplifying payroll; however, he expressed that he is deeply
disappointed that the proposed legislation does not retain the
provision on pay freezes. He maintained that his constituents
and the public support restrictions on spending and new state
government hires.
3:37:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL restated that Version O allows the governor
to not take a paycheck and not pay taxes on money not received.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE confirmed that the governor's end-of-year
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form W2 would reflect the amount
of salary that he takes.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL continued by saying that Version O changes
payroll to every other Friday, rather than the first and
fifteenth of the month. He asked for confirmation that to
retain the pay freezes in the original version of HB 71, DOA and
the bargaining units would have to come to an agreement.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE explained that the original version of HB 71
only applied to unrepresented employees; for anyone under
contract, the provision would have to be negotiated; and DOA has
attempted to do that.
3:39:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked whether there was any reason for
not offering that option [reduced salary] to any state employee
- not just the governor. She suggested that there are other
reasons a person might want to take advantage of the provision,
such as to avoid being in a higher tax bracket.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE replied that she is not sure it could be
offered to every class of employee because of federal law. She
maintained that the governor is in a different category in state
statute than other employees. She offered to pose that
possibility to DOA's attorney.
3:40:00 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS agreed that adding other classifications to
the proposed legislation may be logical.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE offered to find out and reiterated that
federal law may interfere with that possibility.
3:40:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL referred to a proposal by the governor that
if "something didn't happen by a certain day," the governor
would forego his pay and the legislature would as well. He
asked hypothetically: If the legislators' pay was suspended
after day 120 of the legislative session for failure to pass a
budget, would they be liable for federal tax on the salary they
were not receiving if they are not included in the HB 71 waiver.
COMMISSIONER RIDLE offered that the governor's proposal [HB 283
and SB 141] only applied to per diem, and legislators are not
currently taxed on per diem.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL expressed his understanding that different
proposals were introduced. He suggested that if there was
legislation resulting in a reduction to legislators' pay for
some reason, they would be liable for federal tax, unless a
provision such as in Version O was in place to include them.
3:42:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON suggested that possibly he was referring
to a bill she introduced eliminating per diem after 90 days [of
the legislative session]; however, per diem does not get taxed.
3:43:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX moved to adopt the CS for HB 71, Version
30-GH1018\O, Wayne, 2/28/18, as the working document.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH objected.
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Wool, LeDoux, and
Kreiss-Tomkins voted in favor of adopting the CS for HB 71.
Representatives Birch and Johnson voted against it. Therefore,
Version O was adopted as a work draft by a vote of 3-2.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SCR 10 Sponsor Statement 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Ver U 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Summary of Changes ver D-U 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Fiscal Note LAA 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| SCR 10 Supporting Document - Letters of Support 02.22.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
SCR 10 |
| HB 71 Sectional Analysis 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| HB71 ver O 3.2.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| HB 71 Explanation of Changes 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| HB400 Sponsor Statement 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 Sectional Analysis 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 ver A 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 Fiscal Note DPS 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HB400 Amendment 1 3.7.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/13/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/15/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 400 |
| HJR38 Sponsor Statement 2.26.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR038 ver A 2.22.18.PDF |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Fiscal Note LEG 2.26.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Index of Support Documents 2.26.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Letters of Support 2.26.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Index of Reference Documents 2.26.2018b.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Additional Documents- Reference 2.26.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Powerpoint Presentation 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Dick Welsh 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Ocean View Community Council 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Beth Fread 2.27.2018.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter Anchorage Board of Realtors 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Ocean View Community Council 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Document Written Testimony from Bob Gastrock 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Alaska Association of Realtors 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from Dimond Shopping Center 2.28.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Public Letters of Support 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Document Written Testimony from John Pletcher 2.28.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document Testifier Resume 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Documnet- Letter Robert Gastrock 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Supporting Document- Pictures from John Pletcher 3.1.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR 38 Supporting Letter from Bonne' Woldstad 3.1.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Support Letter from James Armstrong 3.1.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR 38 Supporting Document- Jack Brown Wirtten Testimony 3.1.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR 38 Supporting Letter from Roy Longacre 3.5.2018.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Opposing Document- Alaska Railroad Letter of Opposition 2.27.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/1/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HJR38 Opposition Letter- Teamseters Local 959 3.9.18.pdf |
HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HJR 38 |
| HB310 Sponsor Statement 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 ver A 2.6.18.PDF |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Fiscal Note DHSS 2.16.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Child Marriage in America Executive Summary 2.19.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Child Marriage in America 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Minors Married in Alaska 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-Tahirih Child Marriage Backgrounder 2.6.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document- Letter from Office of Victim's Rights 2.20.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document- Letters of Support 2.22.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |
| HB310 Supporting Document-ACT Support Letter 2.27.18.pdf |
HSTA 2/22/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/8/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 310 |