Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 120
02/24/2010 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB314 | |
| HB71 | |
| HB331 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 314 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 331 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 71 - ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVES REGISTRY
2:21:02 PM
CHAIR RAMRAS announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 71, "An Act relating to a registry for advance
health care directives." [Before the committee was CSHB
71(HSS).]
2:21:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES, speaking as one of the bill's joint prime
sponsors, moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS)
for HB 71, Version 26-LS0289\T, Kurtz/Bannister, 1/21/10, as the
work draft. There being no objection, Version T was before the
committee.
[Chair Ramras turned the gavel over to Representative Herron.]
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES explained that HB 71 addresses advance
health care directives - commonly known as living wills. A
family member of an acquaintance of hers experienced a medical
emergency while the family was on a trip out of state, and
although the person who took ill did have a living will, it had
been left locked up at home and so was of no use whatsoever.
Representative Holmes said that upon hearing about this
experience, she realized that she, too, could potentially be in
a similar situation someday because although she does have a
living will, she keeps it locked up at her father's house.
House Bill 71 would establish, under the Department of Health
and Social Services (DHSS), a voluntary registry for advance
health care directives; those who choose to do so, could submit
their living will information to the DHSS for inclusion in the
registry - a secure, online database - that could then be
accessed by hospitals and healthcare providers across the state.
2:23:10 PM
JAMES WALDO, Staff, Representative Lindsey Holmes, Alaska State
Legislature - on behalf of Representative Holmes, one of the
bill's joint prime sponsors - added that once entered into the
registry, a person's living will would also be accessible to the
person, his/her agent, guardian, or surrogate, and other types
of healthcare facilities such as nursing homes. In response to
a question, he explained that under Version T, the DHSS would be
allowed to contract with a registry organization to establish
and maintain the State registry - such an organization would be
able to do so at less cost than the DHSS.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG observed that the DHSS's decreased
fiscal note for Version T reflects that change.
MR. WALDO concurred.
[Representative Herron returned the gavel to Chair Ramras.]
2:26:21 PM
WARD B. HURLBURT, M.D., Director and Chief Medical Officer,
Central Office, Division of Public Health, Department of Health
and Social Services, explained that HB 71 creates a mechanism
for the storage of advance health care directives, and that both
the division and the DHSS have worked with the sponsor and are
in support of the intent to have advance health care directives
made available via the proposed registry. The administration,
however, has taken a neutral position on HB 71 due to the fiscal
note.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG, mentioning that he strongly supports
HB 71, expressed a desire for national uniformity and interstate
cooperation regarding advance health care directives.
DR. HURLBURT, in response to a question, surmised that the
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO)
could potentially provide a forum to address such issues. He
pointed out that any information submitted to the proposed
registry would be accessible to healthcare providers out of
state. Furthermore, some other states have adopted similar law,
and so could serve as models for Alaska's registry.
CHAIR RAMRAS said he opposes HB 71 due to the fiscal note, and
questioned why the State should pay someone over $100,000 per
year to maintain the proposed registry.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES clarified that the bulk of the fiscal note
addresses startup costs, and that the amount required to
maintain the registry after startup would quickly be scaled
back.
DR. HURLBURT concurred.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG suggested that the issues raised by the
fiscal note would be better addressed by the House Finance
Committee, the bill's next committee of referral.
2:35:01 PM
MARIE DARLIN, Coordinator, AARP Capital City Task Force, noted
that members' packets contain the AARP's letter of support for
HB 71, and that her group is among those that worked very hard,
for four years, to statutorily provide for advance health care
directives, and so views HB 71 as a follow-up piece of
legislation that would allow advance health care directives to
actually be useful and function as intended. The AARP has
worked very hard, and will continue to work very hard, to get
its members to complete their advance health care directives
and, hopefully, carry them with them; most people won't,
however, and so HB 71 would hopefully provide recourse for those
people. She indicated that although the AARP has not yet
calculated the cost of maintaining the proposed registry, the
AARP would like to see some consideration given to low-income
people, perhaps via providing for a very low [registration fee].
With regard to the issue of needing access to the registry when
traveling outside of Alaska, she offered her understanding that
the bill is not yet clear with regard to whether healthcare
professionals in the state a person is traveling in would have
access to Alaska's registry. Regardless that that issue is one
that might still need to be clarified, the AARP still supports
HB 71 and hopes that it will pass.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES noted that proposed AS 13.52.310(c)
outlines who could have access to the information in the
registry, and that it specifically provides that a hospital in
another state could obtain information from Alaska's registry if
requested to do so by the individual or his/her agent, guardian,
or surrogate.
MS. DARLIN questioned whether that language is all that's
necessary.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES offered her belief that it is, that a
healthcare provider would be able to access information in the
registry regardless of where the healthcare provider and the
person happen to be. That is her intent, she concluded.
MS. DARLIN, in response to a question, said that she does not
know how many people would take advantage of the registry, nor
how many people even have an advance health care directive in
place yet, nor how such could be estimated.
DR. HURLBURT, in response to a question, surmised that although
the details still need to be worked out, there would be various
options for submitting advance health care directives to the
registry; that they could be submitted in person, by mail, or
electronically; that there would be a central location for such
submissions; and that the intent is for a private firm to
administer the registry and provide training to Alaska's
hospitals and healthcare providers. In response to a further
question, he explained that the DHSS staff the fiscal note
references would be responsible for monitoring the procurement
and selection processes, and help with statewide logistics. In
response to a comment, he said he is unable to address the
amount of the salary listed in the fiscal note.
CHAIR RAMRAS questioned how large of a registration fee would be
required in order to pay for that staff position.
2:44:37 PM
DR. HURLBURT suggested that a registration fee, even a modest
one, could prove to be a disincentive for people who might wish
to use the registry. The intent of the bill is to facilitate
the use of advance health care directives.
CHAIR RAMRAS remarked that regardless of the public good the
bill would accomplish, it still puts a burden on the State and
creates another job in State government.
REPRESENTATIVE HOLMES, in response to a question, explained that
the department has worked very hard to reduce the fiscal note,
thus illustrating the importance being placed on establishing an
advance health care directive registry; under Version T, only
one employee would be needed for the first year, with personal
services costs being scaled back in subsequent years. In
response to a question, she indicated that there is a lot of
concern among those she's heard from that a registration fee
would be required.
CHAIR RAMRAS said he is opposed to creating another job. He
noted that the language of proposed AS 13.52.310(h) says in
part, "The department may charge a fee to file a directive in
the registry", and suggested that the word, "may" be changed to
the word "shall" in order to offset the estimated personnel
costs.
DR. HURLBURT remarked that if such a change were made, then the
committee should also consider having the bill provide an
exemption from the fee for those who are indigent.
REPRESENTATIVE LYNN said he could envision even someone with
just less income also being unable to afford a registration fee.
In response to a comment, he said that if having an advance
health care directive is a good thing, then it logically follows
that a registry for such directives would also be a good thing
because then people could actually make use of their directives.
It would be nice, therefore, if everyone, regardless of income,
could get their directives added to the registry.
2:52:47 PM
LORILYN SWANSON, Manager, Fireweed Place, Tlingit-Haida Regional
Housing Authority (THRHA) - after mentioning that in addition to
managing an independent-living senior complex, she also serves
on the Juneau Commission on Aging (JCOA) - indicated that she is
advocating for the adoption of HB 71, and is in favor of the
State of Alaska establishing and maintaining an advance health
care directive registry, which would hopefully be incorporated
into a national advance health care directive registry. She
went on to say:
I support this for several reasons. Many of us have
advance directives, and they are filed away in our
home files. ... Yes, we know they are there, but I ask
you, how many family members know where it is or how
to access the information - especially in an
emergency. We live in the age of world travel. ...
For those having an advance directive, they probably
do not carry it with them; I know I don't, and I
imagine that many of you do not as well.
I also see firsthand the confusion that can be created
by medical emergencies. I manage an apartment
building for an aging senior population. A 911 call
leads to the emergency personnel being called to the
building, and one of the first questions that I am
usually asked, if it is a life threatening emergency,
is, "Do you know if this person has an advance
directive in place?" I may know, but unless it is
lying on the table or in plain sight in the apartment,
I do not feel comfortable answering that question
unless the tenant has specifically instructed me to do
so in case of an emergency, and then I am still not
comfortable with it.
In both of these cases, should there be a State
registry, with coordination to a national registry,
any emergency personnel or institution would have
computer access to this information immediately. This
is why we all have an advance directive in place, so
that it can be acted upon per our own personal wishes
and instructions. I would like to say, however, that
I do not feel there should be a filing fee for
registering. I feel that this would be a ...
detriment for the many who are on low income, and they
would not file. We worked hard, for four years, to
get the advance directive here, in the state of
Alaska, and now it is time to make it work by
establishing this State registry. Thank you.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked how many people in Alaska would
be eligible for inclusion in the proposed registry if the bill
passes.
MS. SWANSON offered her belief that anyone who has an advance
health care directive would be eligible for inclusion. She,
too, relayed that she doesn't know how many people have an
advance health care directive in place, though as an advocate
for senior issues, she encourages everyone, not just seniors, to
have one. In response to a question, she surmised that
mandating a registration fee would probably not be popular with
lower-income Alaskans.
2:57:02 PM
EMILY NENON, Director, Alaska Government Relations, American
Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), said that the
ACS CAN supports HB 71. She recounted that in his later years,
her father developed severe dementia, and spent the last four
years of his live in a nursing home. During the last six months
of his life, his advance health care directive was overlooked
three separate times. On one occasion, when he was still living
in the nursing home, her mother was called to meet the ambulance
staff taking him from the nursing home to the hospital, and when
she got there, she found that the ambulance staff had managed to
resuscitate him, and the attending physician was mortified upon
learning that her father had had an advance health care
directive but the nursing home had not sent it over with the
ambulance staff. In conclusion, she said she doesn't want to
see anyone else go through the same agony her family went
through.
[HB 71, Version T, was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 01 HB314 Sponsor Statement ver A.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 02 HB314 Bill v. A.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 03 HB314 Sectional Analysis ver A.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 04 HB314 Amendment A 3.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 05 HB314-Law-Crim-02-11-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 06 HB314 - DOLWD-WC-01-28-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 07 HB314 Letter AK Spine Institute 2-2-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 08 HB314 Letter NFIB 1-31-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 09 HB314 NCCI AK Medical Cost Comparison.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 10 HB314 NCCI AK vs Countrywide Medical Cost per Case.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 11 HB314 NCCI All States Medical Cost Comparison.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 12 HB314 Letter ASMA 1-1-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 13 HB314 Suggested changes ASMA 1-1-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 14 HB314 Workers' Compensation Premium Rate Ranking cy 2008.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 15 HB314 8 AAC 45 082 Medical Treatment.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 314 |
| 01 HB71 propsed Bill CS v.T .pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 02 HB71 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 03 HB71 Sectional.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 04 HB71 Changes to v. C.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 05 HB71(HSS) Bill v. C.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 06 HB71 Bill v. E.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 07 HB071CS(JUD)-DHSS-IPEMS-2-15-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 08 HB71CS(HSS) - DHSS FN 4-15-09.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 09 HB71 AARP Support Ltr.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 10 HB71 Relevant Statutes.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 71 |
| 01 HB331 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
hb 331 |
| 02 HB331 Bill v. R.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
|
| 03 HB331-DHSS-YC-2-22-10.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
hb 331 |
| 04 HB331 AK Court Fines & Forfeitures Annual.htm |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| 06 HB331 FAQs.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
hb 331 |
| 05 HB331-UYCA FactBrief.docx |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| 07 HB331 Fines in Statute.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM HJUD 2/25/2010 1:00:00 PM |
hb 331 |
| 08 HB331 Support Letters.pdf |
HJUD 2/24/2010 1:00:00 PM |
HB 331 |