Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/09/2010 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB70 | |
| SB257 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 257 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 331 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 70 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 70
"An Act establishing the farm-to-school program in the
Department of Natural Resources, the Alaska grown
fresh fruit and vegetable grant program in the
Department of Education and Early Development, the
farmers' market technology improvement pilot program
in the Department of Environmental Conservation, and
the farmers to food banks pilot program in the
Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development."
REPRESENTATIVE CARL GATTO, SPONSOR, presented an overview
of the bill, explaining that HB 70 would help farmers and
children by creating a nexus between children and real food
that children can be exposed too. He noted that people do
not use enough fresh food, especially children. As a
result, 27 percent of high school students in Alaska are
obese or overweight. The legislation would provide students
with opportunities that are not currently available, such
as "agriculture day" in elementary schools, which would
focus on educating children about where food comes from.
The bill focuses primarily on the encouragement phase,
helping students to get excited about dealing with fresh
food with the help of the farmers.
Representative Gara appreciated the work on the Mat-Su
farming issue. He asked for verification that the
legislation reflects current law in regards to price
preference granted to locally grown agricultural products.
Representative Gatto confirmed that is correct.
Representative Gatto also mentioned food security. Root
cellars and farmer's storage help root crops to last
throughout the year. The creation of a farm-to-school
program will help children recognize this and aims at
encouraging farmers to stay with farming.
2:14:05 PM
Representative Austerman asked whether schools are defined
in the bill. Representative Gatto did not have an answer at
that time.
Representative Austerman noted that work programs such as
the Alaska Job Corps that teach culinary plans should be
included in the legislation in addition to traditional
schools. Representative Gatto agreed and noted that it is
possible that the term "schools" in the bill is defined as
all schools overseen by the Department of Education.
2:15:37 PM
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to ADOPT proposed committee
substitute, work draft 26-LS0284\P, Bannister, 4/8/10.
Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for discussion.
2:16:01 PM
BEN MULLIGAN, STAFF, CO-CHAIR STOLTZE explained that the
CS, which was drafted in the previous year, was updated to
reflect passage in the current fiscal year. January 25,
2010 was changed to January 25, 2011 on Page 3, line 20.
The sunset date was changed to July 1, 2014, in section 5,
to reflect that the legislature would review the program
after four years.
There being NO further OBJECTION, the CS was adopted.
Co-Chair Stoltze talked of farming and farming regions and
observed that the bill's relevance is not just limited to
the Palmer area.
2:17:45 PM
Vice-Chair Thomas wondered if there is still a significant
amount of farming in Tanana. Representative Kelly replied
that it has grown a lot.
2:19:02 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze mentioned the fiscal note and asked for
any discussion from committee members. Representative
Doogan asked for verification that the fiscal note was to
the Resources Committee version.
Co-Chair Stoltze replied in the affirmative and noted it
would be updated to reflect the Finance CS.
Representative Doogan noted the fiscal note included the
funding for two positions and asked for a brief description
of each of the positions.
2:20:57 PM
FRANCI HAVEMEISTER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE,
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, discussed the department's
fiscal note. She confirmed that there are two positions
requested under the bill. One position is for a Range 18
development specialist required to implement the in-school
education process as well as educating the schools
statewide. In addition, an agricultural inspector would be
necessary if a garden program were implemented, in order to
provide food inspection prior to its entry into schools for
consumption.
Representative Austerman observed that it appeared the
legislation would only involve schools in the public
system. He noted that a definition of schools is needed and
that the legislation should apply to university and all
others.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked Representative Gatto if he would
want the bill to be inclusive of all schools.
Representative Gatto verified that he would like to be as
inclusive as possible. He remarked that he would even like
to see people who have no ability to grow crops included,
as long as the impetus and structure for the program are in
place with state support.
Representative Austerman commented that he would also like
to be as inclusive as possible for as many as possible.
2:23:37 PM
Representative Doogan stated that the bill covers
everything that the Department of Education accredits
except for the University of Alaska. He noted that the list
located on page 6, appears to be complete with the
exception of the University.
Representative Gara asked the department to explain whether
it is already providing agricultural inspection for
products that are produced in the state. He wondered why
the bill required another agricultural inspector position.
Ms. Havemeister answered that the position would be
necessary if gardens were implemented in rural areas to
guarantee that the process of clean food development is
understood. There are currently two inspectors at the
Division of Agriculture, and their time would not allow
them to travel to rural Alaska.
Representative Gara asked for verification that the
department currently employs two inspectors. Ms.
Havemeister agreed.
Representative Gara asked if the program would increase the
demand by 20 percent. Ms. Havemeister responded that
implementing the program state-wide would increase expenses
due to travel costs.
Representative Gara voiced that there are farms statewide
that have products for consumption. He noted that it is not
obvious how the program differs from the agricultural
inspector needs that currently exist in rural areas.
Ms. Havemeister clarified that there are two inspectors for
Anchorage who do inspections for large producers who sell
into retail. For schools wanting to move product into the
school system for consumption, there would need to be an
inspection process in place.
Co-Chair Stoltze voiced the need to look at the fiscal note
further.
2:27:49 PM
Representative Austerman asked whether rural areas with
community gardens would need the produce to be inspected
prior to bringing it into the schools for consumption. Ms.
Havemeister affirmed.
Representative Austerman asked if there would be a fee to
the community for the inspection.
Ms. Havemeister responded that the fiscal note does not
reflect a fee for community inspection. The fiscal note
would include the development specialist traveling to do
more education type-work. Currently, most of the
inspections are done on the road system so the department
has not had to address the issue.
Representative Austerman asked if a restaurant has to pay a
fee for inspections, would the gardens also be subject to
an inspection fee from the Department of Natural Resources
(DNR). Ms. Havemeister verified the possibility and
responded that DNR would have to look into it.
Representative Austerman asked if DNR would anticipate
regulations. Ms. Havemeister responded possibly, and noted
it would depend on what schools were involved and on how
extensive the travel would be.
2:29:51 PM
Representative Gara noted the importance of updating the
fiscal note before the bill goes to the Senate.
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report CS HB 70(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS HB 70(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with no
recommendations and with new fiscal notes from the
Department of Education and the Department of Natural
Resources.
2:31:08 PM At EASE
2:32:55 PM RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB257 Support Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 257 |
| SB_257_Sponsor_Statement_corrected.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 257 |
| 01 HB331 Sponsor Statement[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| 05 HB331-UYCA FactBrief[1].docx |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| 07 HB331 Fines in Statute[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| 08 HB331 Support Letters[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| HB331 Change to bill in (H)JUD.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| HB 331 AK Youth Courts FAQS.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 331 |
| UYCA Youth Court Directory 4-2-2010 (3).doc |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Explanation of changes.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| explanation ofchanges HB 70CSHB70(Res)updated020110.doc |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Fact Sheet.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| farm to school supporting materials.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| farm to school supporting materials.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Letter of support 1.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Letter of support 2.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Letter of support 3.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Request for hearing.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Sectional.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| Sponsor statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| HB 70 CS WORKDRAFT 26-LS0248 P.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |
| HB70CS(RES)-DNR-AG-04-09-10NEW.pdf |
HFIN 4/9/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 70 |