Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
03/13/2023 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB69 | |
| HB106 | |
| HB105 | |
| HB21 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 105 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 69 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 69-RECLASSIFICATION OF FIRST CLASS CITIES
8:02:04 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 69, "An Act relating to the reclassification
of first class cities as second class cities; and providing for
an effective date."
8:02:36 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE CRONK, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, explained that HB 69 would allow a community to
reclassify from a one-city community to a two-city community for
the purpose of combining a school district with another school
district.
8:03:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT questioned which communities would the
proposed legislation currently apply to, and she questioned if
there would be other cities forthcoming.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK replied that currently only Tanana would be
affected.
DAVE STANCLIFF, Staff, Representative Mike Cronk, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Cronk, prime sponsor,
replied to a follow-up question, explaining that there are four
cities in the state which fall below the 400-person minimum
requirement to be a first-class city. He stated that, if the
legislation passes, Tanana would not be required to make the
change, as the change would not be mandatory.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK, in response to a follow-up question,
stated that Tanana requested this because its school is not
supported well enough by the local government. He added that
the government is under stress because the population has fallen
to 241 residents. He continued that the district is working
with a larger school district, but ultimately it is up to the
community to decide.
8:05:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX questioned whether reclassification to a
second-class city would still require local tax contribution.
MR. STANCLIFF replied that this would change when a city moves
from a first- to second-class city, and this is the reason
Tanana is considering the change.
8:06:16 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY expressed the understanding that this
change would need to be made through statute.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK responded that because Tanana is a first-
class city, the existing statute does not allow this change.
8:07:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE PRAX commented that first-class cities provide
some services. He questioned whether these would be affected by
a change in class.
MR. STANCLIFF replied that the local community would have to
decide, and they would do this under the proposed bill by a
majority vote. He expressed uncertainty concerning the local
services; however, he stated that the city is having difficulty
obtaining quorum votes. He expressed the understanding that
Tanana is failing as a city under the first-class status.
8:08:39 AM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 8:08 a.m.
8:08:52 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD opened public testimony on HB 69. After
ascertaining there was no one who wished to testify, she closed
public testimony.
8:09:12 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STORY asked whether the school districts had
responded.
8:09:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK replied that the Tanana City School
District is under contract with the Yukon-Koyukuk School
District (YKSD), and now Tanana is basically functioning under.
He stated that both school districts are in agreement.
8:10:25 AM
CO-CHAIR ALLARD announced HB 69 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB69 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 69 |
| HB69 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 69 |
| HB0069A.PDF |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 69 |
| HB69 Hearing Request.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 69 |
| HB106-Fiscal Note.PDF |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB106A.PDF |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB106 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB106 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB106- House Education Hearing Request.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 106 |
| HB0105A.PDF |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| HB105 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| HB105- House Education Hearing Request 3-8-2023.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| HB105 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| HB105-Fiscal Note.PDF |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 105 |
| HB 21 - Letter of Support from KPBSD.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| HB 21 - Presentation.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| HB21A.PDF |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| HB 21 - School Healthcare Consolidation Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |
| HB 21 - Healthcare Consolidation Bill Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HEDC 3/13/2023 8:00:00 AM |
HB 21 |