Legislature(2007 - 2008)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/21/2008 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB122 | |
| SB204 | |
| HB67 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 201 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 122 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 204 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 67 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 67(FIN) am
"An Act relating to a mandatory exemption from
municipal property taxes for certain college property,
to a mandatory exemption from municipal property taxes
for residences of certain widows or widowers, and to
optional exemptions from municipal property taxes for
property of certain fraternal organizations and for
certain residences of law enforcement officers; and
providing for an effective date."
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG, CO-SPONSOR, addressed HB 67. Rep.
Gruenburg referred to HB 67 as the "cop in the neighborhood"
bill. The provision allows a municipality to provide an
exemption from municipal property taxes for peace officers
who move into a high crime neighborhood. He maintained that
having an officer in the neighborhood is a crime deterrent.
He outlined the sections of the bill:
Sec. 1 extends the disabled veteran property tax
exemptions to widows and widowers of peace officers.
He noted the definitions used for this are the same as
those in SB 204.
Sec. 2 added by Senator Thomas expands the optional
municipal tax exemption for residences to 40,000.
Sec. 3 was added by Representative Meyer. Originally
the exemption was mandatory. This was changed to
optional to allow municipalities to exempt property of
a private none profit four year college or university
that is accredited that is not subject to the mandatory
exemption. He added that other taxing provisions would
still apply.
Representative Gruenberg noted that section 3 is important
to a facility located on the Alaska Pacific University
campus.
Sec. 4 provides the option for municipalities to exempt
religious, charitable, education, scientific, literary,
and fraternal organizations. Representative Gruenburg
explained that many of the facilities are used as a
meeting place and serve the entire communities.
Representative Gruenburg purported that HB 67 has served as
a repository for many tax relief provisions. He urged the
Committee to pass HB 67 because it provides property tax
relief to a wide variety of people and organizations.
Senator Elton asked how the tax exemption effects "full and
true value" that is applied to the school funding formula.
Representative Gruenburg was not certain. He explained that
the exemption may trigger a round of additional assessments
or trigger the municipality to look at the rest of it's
taxing structure.
10:50:17 AM
Mr. Van Sant explained that HB 67 deals with optional
exemptions and has no revenue impact to the State. He
addressed the question regarding the full value
determination. Any optional exemption, authorized by a
municipality is put back into the full value, and would
thereby not effect school funding. "If a municipality's
full value is $100 and they exempt optionally a fraternal
organization, for example, those are put back in so the full
value will remain $100 even though the local assessed value
may be $85." The full value will not be effected by this.
For school funding purposes the 4 mills would be based on
$100 rather than $85. He reiterated that because these are
all optional exemptions it would not have an impact on the
State.
Mr. Van Sant added a clarification: Sec. 1 does not extend
the exemption to widowers; it clarifies that it removes the
age requirement. The language combines the criteria for
disabled veterans and widowers. The language is removed so
that there is no age restriction for veterans.
10:52:38 AM
Rep. Gruenburg said the effective date needed to change
because, if HB 67 was enacted now, the effective date would
be retroactive.
Co-Chair Stedman MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1, 25-LS0314/J.2
Cook, 2/19/08.
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for purposes of clarification.
REPRESENTATIVE CHENAULT, Co-Sponsor, explained that the
amendment allows for boroughs, to charge cities inside the
borough, for collecting a tax that is not uniform to the
borough. The amendment provides for the borough to charge a
fee to pay for purchases necessary for tax collection.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION.
There being NO OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was adopted.
Senator Dyson asked if there would be efforts to combine
legislation dealing with tax exemptions.
10:55:19 AM
Co-Chair Stedman stated the intention was to provide an
opportunity for discussion on various proposed legislation
dealing with property tax exemption.
Senator Dyson supported combining the tax exemption
legislation.
Co-Chair Stedman said the provision may fit into a long-term
fiscal bill.
HB 67 was Heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|