Legislature(2023 - 2024)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/10/2024 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB19 | |
| HB217 | |
| HB155 | |
| HB66 | |
| HB28 | |
| HB129 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 217 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 50 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 155 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 66 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 347 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 202 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 129 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 28 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 66(FIN) am
"An Act relating to homicide resulting from conduct
involving controlled substances; relating to
misconduct involving a controlled substance; relating
to sentencing; and providing for an effective date."
9:47:49 AM
Co-Chair Olson announced that there were 7 amendments
pertaining to the bill.
9:48:05 AM
AT EASE
9:49:14 AM
RECONVENED
ANGIE KEMP, CRIMINAL DIVISION DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF LAW,
provided a brief recap of the legislation.
9:50:03 AM
KACI SCHROEDER, SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL,
DEPARTMENT OF LAW, introduced herself.
9:50:05 AM
Ms. Kemp explained the bill.
9:51:09 AM
AT EASE
10:06:35 AM
RECONVENED
10:06:46 AM
Ms. Kemp continued to address the legislation.
10:08:08 AM
Co-Chair Olson MOVED Amendment 1 (copy on file) and
OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
Ms. Kemp explained that the amendment.
10:13:02 AM
Senator Bishop wondered about body cameras and whether
every police department adhered to the same protocol of
wearing body cameras.
10:14:05 AM
Ms. Kemp replied in the negative. She added that body
cameras were the trend in most agencies and that most used
audio recordings.
10:14:19 AM
Co-Chair Olson REMOVED his objection.
10:14:28 AM
Senator Kiehl requested further discussion of the hearsay
element of the bill.
10:14:43 AM
Senator Wilson asked whether video footage could be used in
court if a victim chose not to, or was unable to, testify
in person.
10:15:16 AM
Ms. Kemp replied in the affirmative.
10:15:45 AM
There being no further objection Amendment 1 was adopted.
Senator Olson MOVED Amendment 2 and objected for the
purpose of discussion.
10:15:56 AM
Ms. Schroeder explained that the amendment changed the name
of "child pornography" to "child sexual abuse material" and
adds to the list of registerable sex offenses.
Co-Chair Olson REMOVED his objection to Amendment 2. There
being no further objection Amendment 2 was adopted.
10:17:08 AM
Co-Chair Olson moved Amendment 3 and objected for the
purpose of discussion.
10:17:39 AM
SENATOR MATT CLAMAN, SPONSOR, explained Amendment 3.
10:18:18 AM
Co-Chair Olson REMOVED his objection to Amendment 3.
Senator Wilson OBJECTED to Amendment 3.
10:18:33 AM
Senator Wilson stated that testimony from victim advocate
groups had expressed concern for the amendment. He thought
that victim notification was important.
10:19:46 AM
Senator Kiehl asked about transportation.
10:20:13 AM
Senator Claman replied that the transportation portion was
primarily in Section 15 and related to people subject to an
ex parte order. He said the language had been cleaned up to
allow for a 7-day holding period before a hearing, rather
than 10 days.
10:21:36 AM
Senator Kiehl remarked that the bill had been carefully
crafted and noted the transportation difficulties.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Bishop, Kiehl, Hoffman, Olson, Merrick
OPPOSED: Wilson
By a vote of 5 YEAS and 1 NAY Amendment 3 was adopted.
10:22:57 AM
Co-Chair Olson MOVED Amendment 4 (copy on file) and
OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
10:23:00 AM
Ms. Schroeder explained Amendment 4.
Senator Wilson asked whether judges would still have
discretion by case.
Ms. Schroeder replied in the affirmative.
Senator Olson REMOVED his OBJECTION. There being no further
OBJECTION Amendment 4 was ADOPTED.
10:24:17 AM
Co-Chair Olson moved AMENDMENT 5 (copy on file).
Senator Merrick OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
10:24:58 AM
AT EASE
10:26:55 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Merrick spoke to her objection. She felt that the
amendment was like another bill currently at play and felt
that the provisions would be more cleanly passed in another
bill rather than incorporated into HB 66.
10:27:23 AM
AT EASE
10:31:42 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Olson WITHDREW Amendment 5.
10:32:20 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to RESCIND committee action in
adopting AMENDMET 4.
10:32:29 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman stated that the contents of Amendment 4
were already drafted into a bill currently in the Senate
Rules Committee.
10:33:04 AM
AT EASE
10:33:17 AM
RECONVENED
Co-Chair Olson clarified that committee action on Amendment
4 had been rescinded.
Senator Olson MOVED Amendment 6 (copy on file). He OBJECTED
for the purpose of discussion.
Ms. Schroeder explained that Amendment 6 had previously
been in HB 11 and addressed the crime of assault in the
presence of a child.
10:34:23 AM
Co-Chair Olson REMOVED his OBJECTION to Amendment 6. There
being no further OBJECTION the amendment was adopted.
10:34:47 AM
Senator Merrick MOVED Amendment 7 (copy on file).
Co-Chair Olson OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
Senator Merrick explained Amendment 7.
Senator Bishop wondered how the amendment applied to
individuals on parole who were hindered by geolocation when
trying to contact a parole officer.
10:36:07 AM
Ms. Kemp replied that it would not apply in that
circumstance.
10:36:51 AM
Senator Kiehl thought that more jail time would certainly
lead to cost increases.
Ms. Kemp had no comment on cost drivers.
10:37:39 AM
Senator Wilson wondered what the department felt the impact
would be from the legislation.
10:38:04 AM
Ms. Kemp responded that the impact on her division was
indeterminate. She was unsure whether there would be
significantly increased spending due to the legislation.
10:39:36 AM
Senator Wilson understood that the department did not
expect a significant increase in spending due to the
legislation.
10:39:59 AM
Ms. Kemp replied that costs would be determined by
convictions and were indeterminate.
10:40:48 AM
Co-Chair Olson WITHDREW his OBJECTION to Amendment 7. There
being no further OBJECTION the amendment was ADOPTED.
10:41:05 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman remarked that the percentage of Alaska
Natives that were incarcerated in the state far exceeded
the total percentage of Alaska Natives in the state. He
expressed grave concern with the numbers and felt that the
issue should be further researched and discussed.
10:42:21 AM
Co-Chair Olson agreed.
10:42:26 AM
Senator Bishop agreed.
10:42:33 AM
Senator Bishop stated that he had other concerns related to
Co-Chair Hoffman's comments.
CSHB 66(FIN)am was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
10:42:57 AM
AT EASE
10:44:42 AM
RECONVENED
hb50
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 50(FIN)
"An Act relating to carbon storage on state land;
relating to the powers and duties of the Alaska Oil
and Gas Conservation Commission; relating to carbon
storage exploration licenses; relating to carbon
storage leases; relating to carbon storage operator
permits; relating to enhanced oil or gas recovery;
relating to long-term monitoring and maintenance of
storage facilities; relating to carbon oxide
sequestration tax credits; relating to the duties of
the Department of Natural Resources; relating to
carbon dioxide pipelines; and providing for an
effective date."
10:45:17 AM
Senator Merrick MOVED to ADOPT the committee substitute for
CSHB 50(FIN), Work Draft 33-GH1567\T (Dunmire, 5/10/24).
Co-Chair Olson OBJECTED for discussion.
10:45:20 AM
KEN ALPER, STAFF, SENATOR DONNY OLSON, explained the CS. He
addressed the Explanation of Changes (copy on file):
Change 5 Removed a new required report of waste from
the AOGCC. This was in section 4 of the Senate
Resources version.
Change 6 Increased the minimum injection fee to be
included within a carbon storage lease, to at least
$10 per ton. This is in Section 16 of the committee
substitute.
Change 7 Restored sections related to regulating gas
storage facilities, including ensuring the
confidentiality of data held by the Regulatory
Commission of Alaska related to the finances of a
facility. This is in Sections 38-44 and 48 of the
committee substitute.
Change 8 Rewrote the section describing how certain
costs related to carbon capture and carbon storage are
not eligible as deductible lease expenditures for the
Oil and Gas Production Tax. This is in Section 46 of
the committee substitute.
10:47:28 AM
Co-Chair Olson WITHDREW his objection. There being NO
further OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
10:47:38 AM
Senator Kiehl wondered whether owner/operator gas storge
facilities would be treated the same as those under the Gas
Storage Authority.
10:48:01 AM
Mr. Alper replied that he did not know whether they would
be treated the same but that the concept was to create
fairness between facilities.
10:48:57 AM
Senator Kiehl asked whether Mr. Alper could speak to the
lease expenditure language.
10:49:04 AM
Mr. Alper referred to Page 39 of the bill, which listed
things that were not deductible. He quoted the bill:
(23) costs incurred for carbon capture or carbon
storage, including fees incurred under AS 41.06.160,
surcharges incurred under AS 41.06.175, or costs
associated with obtaining, operating, or maintaining a
license or lease under AS 38.05.700 38.05.795; in
this paragraph, "carbon capture" does not include gas
processing or gas treatment.
10:50:58 AM
Senator Kiehl remarked that the enhanced oil recovery
language merited further discussion. He wondered whether
the entirety of the capture facility would be deductible if
the carbon was being used for two purposes.
10:51:35 AM
Mr. Alper responded that the Department of Revenue (DOR)
would make resolutions to that concern.
10:52:29 AM
Senator Bishop looked at Change 6:
Change 6 Increased the minimum injection fee to be
included within a carbon storage lease, to at least
$10 per ton. This is in Section 16 of the committee
substitute.
Co-Chair Bishop spoke of previous work in Senate Resources
Committee and asked whether the change would remove ability
of the commissioner of DNR to negotiate below $10 per ton.
10:53:32 AM
Mr. Alper replied that the language amended in the bill
changed the number but did not change the other syntax. He
was not certain of the negotiating power and thought DNR
could speak to the question.
10:54:09 AM
Senator Olson removed his objection to the adoption of the
CS. There being no further objection committee substitute
for CSHB 50(FIN), Work Draft 33-GH1567\T (Dunmire, 5/10/24)
was adopted.
CSHB 50(FIN) was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
10:54:36 AM
AT EASE
10:54:44 AM
RECONVENED
10:55:01 AM
RECESS
1:36:56 PM
RECONVENED
sb135
HOUSE BILL NO. 135 am
"An Act relating to and disapproving recommendations
of the State Officers Compensation Commission; and
providing for an effective date."
1:37:48 PM
HUNTER LOTTSFELDT, STAFF, SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI,
introduced himself.
1:38:26 PM
SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, SPONSOR, introduced the
legislation.
1:39:57 PM
Mr. Lottsfeldt discussed the Sectional Analysis (copy on
file):
Section 1 establishes that money can be subtracted
from the Permanent Fund dividend payment and
contributed to the Alaska Work and Save Program
participant account.
Section 2 establishes that the Alaska Work and Save
Program is one of the eligible programs under the
contribution list for the PFD.
Section 3 prohibits the department from withholding a
coordination fee for contributions to the Alaska Work
and Save Program participant account.
Section 4 Establishes the Alaska Work and Save Program
under the Department of Revenue and establishes the
Alaska Retirement Savings Board to administrate the
program.
• New AS 44.25.400 is the language of the program:
o (b) states that an employer that does not
offer a qualified retirement plan shall
facilitate participation of their employees
in the program.
o (c) states that under the program,
square4 An eligible employee is automatically
enrolled in the program. Their default
contribution rate increases at a rate
established by the board
square4 An employee can opt out of the program
or set different contribution rates
square4 Any person who earns compensation in
Alaska can voluntarily enroll in the
program.
o (d) Specific rates of return are not
guaranteed. The state is not liable for loss
from participation in the program
o (e) Employers may still set up their own
retirement plans.
• New AS 44.25.410 establishes the Alaska
Retirement Savings Board in the Department of
Revenue to administer the Alaska Work and Save
Program.
o The board consists of nine trustees
• New AS 44.25.420 establishes powers and duties of
the Alaska Retirement Savings board.
o Subsection (a) establishes the bounds of what
will be required of the board
o Subsection (b) establishes what the board may
or may not do
• New AS 44.25.430 establishes:
• The Attorney General shall provide legal
counsel for the board
• New AS 44.25.440 establishes:
• Trustee's shall be compensated for each day and
given a travel per diem
• New AS 44.25.450 establishes:
• The department shall provide staff for the
board
• New AS 44.25.460 establishes:
• Individual information shall be confidential
• New AS 44.25.470 establishes:
• The Commissioner of Labor and Workforce
Development will accept complaints and issue fines for
employers not participating in the program
• New AS 44.25.490 provides definitions
Section 5 Establishes the initial appointments and
terms of the Alaska Retirement Savings Board trustees
other than the Commissioners of Revenue and Labor.
Section 6 Sets an effective date for the bill on
January 1, 2025.
1:42:27 PM
Co-Chair Stedman requested further clarification on what
the bill would do.
1:42:45 PM
Senator Wielechowski replied that the bill applied to
businesses that did not offer a retirement plan. The plan
would be "opt-out" for employees and would require no
employer match. He said that employees could withdraw the
funds if they change jobs. He said that the bill would make
it easier for small businesses to set up retirement style
savings accounts for employees.
1:45:26 PM
Co-Chair Stedman understood that when the employer cut the
employee's paycheck a certain amount would be sent to the
trust account.
1:45:36 PM
Mr. Lottsfeldt replied in the affirmative. The action would
be a small addition to the monthly payroll of employers.
1:46:36 PM
Co-Chair Stedman thought that an employer could do an
enlarged IRA for their employees without instituting a plan
as significant as the bill suggested. He expressed concern
with burdening the employer with more paperwork.
1:47:17 PM
Senator Wielechowski stated that 64 percent of employers
did not currently offer any kind of similar plan.
1:47:44 PM
Senator Merrick wondered whether thought had been given to
making the plan optional for employer participation.
1:47:55 PM
Senator Wielechowski replied in the affirmative. He
lamented that without a mandate, employers would not choose
to provide a plan for employees.
1:48:16 PM
Mr. Lottsfeldt furthered that the bill was also meant to
motivate small and private businesses to offer plans to
employees.
1:48:59 PM
Senator Kiehl wondered whether the plan would be tax
advantaged like a 401k.
1:49:09 PM
Senator Wielechowski replied that it would have the same
tax advantages as a 401k.
1:49:34 PM
Senator Kiehl commented that a program like what the bill
proposed would have been attractive to him when he was
young and starting out.
SB 135 was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.