Legislature(1993 - 1994)
03/19/1993 01:40 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 66
"An Act relating to municipal property tax exemptions
for certain residences and to property tax equivalency
payments for certain residents; and providing for an
effective date."
Co-Chair Larson announced that HB 66 would be HELD in
Committee following public testimony.
Representative Brown presented members with Amendment 1,
creating a mandatory deferral for low income persons
(Attachment 1). She noted that a memorandum from
Legislative Counsel is attached to Amendment 1. Legal
Counsel advises that it is necessary to include language to
base the optional exemption on "hardship".
In response to a question by Representative Parnell,
Representative Brown explained that $36,000 for individuals
filling jointly has been added to subsection (b). The
intent of the amendment would be to mandate that communities
allow low income citizens to defer tax payments until death.
BRAD BRADLEY, spoke in support of continued funding for the
Senior Citizen Tax Exemption. He pointed out that many
seniors could not afford to stay in the state without the
aid of support programs. He urged the Committee to maintain
current programs. He felt that rural seniors would be most
adversely affected. He suggested that the cap be lowered or
the age raised rather than to discontinue the senior citizen
property tax exemption.
PAUL WOERNER, RETIRED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION spoke in support
of continued funding for the Disabled Veterans Property Tax
Exemption. He pointed out that the Veterans Home is not
being funded. He added that the veteran's burial allowance
is also being discontinued. He stressed that eligible
veterans are 50 percent disabled. He emphasized the
difficulty that disabled veterans encounter in reaching
their full earning potential. He suggested that, "surely in
2
a state that can offer upwards of a $1,000 dollars for each
resident, each year for no other criteria than that person
is a resident in the State for twelve months, surely we
don't have to offer up our disabled American veterans to get
government spending under control."
Representative Grussendorf expressed his concern that
disabled veterans are likely to be renters and would
therefore be affected by the deletion of the Renters Rebate
Program. Mr. Woerner agreed that perhaps half of the
disabled veterans live in rental property.
Representative Grussendorf stated that in making things
easier for the State and municipalities that some times "we
forget who the people were that we originally set the
program up, and the service that it provides."
Representative Martin asserted that the State has an influx
of seniors because the State's senior programs are generous.
He felt that controls must be put on the State's generosity.
Co-Chair Larson clarified that the legislation passed in FY
93 to create a Veterans Home stated that the Home would be
funded with private donations.
Representative Therriault asked if most disabled veterans
would fit under the caps provided for in Amendment 1. Mr.
Woerner thought that most disabled veterans would have
incomes under the cap.
GENE DOWE, LEGISLATIVE OFFICE, VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS
(VFW) spoke in support of continued funding for the Disabled
Veterans Property Tax Exemption.
HB 66 was HELD in Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|