Legislature(2011 - 2012)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/30/2012 09:00 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB313 | |
| HB64 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 313 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 64 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 64
"An Act relating to permanent motor vehicle
registration; and providing for an effective date."
Vice-chair Fairclough MOVED committee substitute HB
64(FIN), 27-LS0327/S.
Co-Chair Thomas OBJECTED for purpose of discussion.
DARRELL BREESE, STAFF, CO-CHAIR STOLTZE, explained the
Committee Substitute (CS). He explained that the changes
included an adjustment of the fee for acquiring permanent
registration for vehicles older than eight years and
trailers. The previous version of the bill included three
times the biannual fee. The goal was to make the
registration affordable for all Alaskans interested in the
option. Another change related to the motor vehicle
registration tax collected by the Division of Motor
Vehicles (DMV). He explained that the change allowed
municipalities to adopt a motor vehicle registration tax
fee for vehicles that were permanently registered. He noted
the change made to the collection of the tax, which allowed
DMV to collect the tax one time unless the municipality
raised the fee above $100 hundred, the city will be
responsible for the collection of the fee.
Co-Chair Stoltze explained the intent of the legislation to
allow Alaskans to avoid the nuisance of taxes for older
cars.
10:05:12 AM
Co-Chair Thomas asked about restrictions for non-residents.
Mr. Breeze responded that there was no restriction for non-
residents.
Representative Gara appreciated the intent of the
legislation, but expressed difficulty understanding the
fiscal note.
WHITNEY BREWSTER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES (via
teleconference), responded that the fiscal note for FY 15
and FY 16 showed an increase in revenue, which accounted
for the $25 in additional fees collected by the DMV for
permanent registration, in and above the bi-annual fee.
Following FY 16, the vehicles would no longer be eligible
for the bi-annual registration fees collected leading to
the significant decrease in collected revenue.
Representative Gara asked if the losses continued past FY
18 at a similar rate.
Ms. Brewster responded that the rates would remain
consistent until approximately $1 million in loss. She
noted the difficulty in projecting for future years. The
projections relied on citizens operating vehicles beyond
eight years. She estimated that approximately 28,400 new
vehicles would be eligible each year based on the current
vehicle count. She pointed out the significant decrease in
revenue in FY 17 and FY 18 because the fiscal note assumed
that all registered vehicles were eligible.
Co-Chair Stoltze opined that the legislation would lead to
increased compliance with registration for trailer and snow
machine owners.
10:10:36 AM
Vice-chair Fairclough expressed that she herself would
qualify for the benefits of the legislation.
Co-Chair Thomas shared the sentiment.
Representative Guttenberg asked Ms. Brewster about the 700
hours of programing time required to make the changes
outlined in the bill.
Mr. Brewster responded that the changes to the 30 year-old
database required approximately 700 hours of technical
labor. The bill would require programming for two potential
scenarios. One scenario would exist for taxpayers opting
for permanent vehicle registration and another for those
who chose against. The 700 programming hours incorporated
changes from HB 64 and HB 10.
Co-Chair Thomas commented on computer upgrades for other
agencies.
Vice-chair Fairclough asked how many people accessed DMV
counters in person.
Ms. Brewster replied that she would provide the requested
information to the committee. She stated that approximately
11 percent of customers visit DMV public offices for in-
person registration.
Vice-chair Fairclough pointed out that the fiscal note
might better reflect a deduction for Alaskans who would
defer registration. She predicted cost-savings to the
consumer and the department. She utilized the online option
provided by DMV herself, which saved her $10.
10:14:29 AM
Representative Neuman asked about the department's
operating costs and revenues.
Ms. Brewster replied that DMV received $66 million in
revenue per year and operated on approximately $16.5
million. The revenue included the motor vehicle
registration tax.
Representative Neuman opined that the state did not require
revenue from DMV.
Ms. Brewster agreed that customer fees could be reduced
without affecting the department's operations.
Representative Neuman was interested in reducing customer
fees further.
10:16:40 AM
Vice-chair Fairclough asked if municipalities were charged
an administrative fee.
Ms. Brewster replied that the DMV did collect 8 percent of
the motor vehicle registration taxes, which become part of
the general fund.
Representative Edgmon believed that the state lacked
eligibility for federal funds.
Ms. Brewster replied in the affirmative.
Representative Edgmon asked about the impact of the
legislation on community revenue.
Ms. Brewster specified that the local communities that
elected to collect motor vehicle registration tax would not
be eligible until 2017. She noted the statute's requirement
that local communities provide the DMV written notice of
the change by January 1, 2015 of the preceding year. The
DMV would not collect a motor vehicle registration tax for
permanent vehicles until 2017 because of the statutory
requirement for notice. Local governments would set their
own rates regarding departmental collections. She thought
that the question regarding municipality loss or gain was
better answered by the local governments.
Representative Edgmon pointed out the plethora of non-
resident vehicles that travel in his district during the
summer months.
Co-Chair Thomas WITHDREW his OBJECTION to the committee
substitute. There being No further OBJECTION the committee
substitute was adopted.
Co-Chair Stoltze pointed out that the fiscal note from the
Department of Environmental Conservation had zero fiscal
impact.
Vice-chair Fairclough MOVED to report CSHB 64 (FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note(s).
CSHB 64(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with a new fiscal note from the
Department of Administration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 313 Sponsor Statement 2012-03-12.pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 313 |
| HB 313 Sectional Analysis Ver 27-LS1223B (EDU).pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 313 |
| HB 313 Fund Balance Letter Mat-Su Resolution 12-006.pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 313 |
| HB 313 Presenation to House Finance.pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 313 |
| CH HB64 version S.pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 64 |
| Summary of new version hb64.docx |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 64 |
| CS HB64 sponsor statement.doc |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 64 |
| HB313 Relevant Statute.pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 313 |
| HB313 Amendment 1 Gara.pdf |
HFIN 3/30/2012 9:00:00 AM |
HB 313 |