Legislature(1997 - 1998)
05/07/1997 08:45 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 63(2d RLS)
"An Act amending the definition of `motor fuel' under
the state's motor fuel tax to add, as a part of the tax
exemption set out in that definition, exemption from
the tax for fuel sold for use in jet propulsion aircraft
operating in flights that continue from foreign
countries, subject to termination of the exemption for that
fuel if a refiner operating a refinery at which the
fuel was produced fails to comply with terms of a voluntary
agreement entered into by the refiner to use Alaska
residents, contractors, and suppliers to provide goods and
services when the refinery's capacity is expanded, t o
add exemption from the tax for certain number 6 `residual
fuel oil,' also known as bunker fuel, and to delete the
exemption from the tax for fuel that is at least 10 percent
alcohol by volume; and repealing ch. 42, SLA 1994, the
Act providing for the imposition of a different tax levy
on residual fuel oil used in and on certain watercraft
until June 30, 1998; and providing for an effective
date."
Nancy Kelly, staff to Representative Gene Therriault, was
invited to join the committee. She read the sponsor
statement into the record and explained the federal
definition of "federal flights".
Jeff Cook, MAPCO, was invited to join the committee. He
said this was a pro-Alaska bill and urged its passage.
Bob Bartholomew, Assistant Director, Division of Income and
Excise Audit, Department of Revenue, was invited to join the
committee. He said it was appropriate to change the tax
schedule. "Bunker Fuel" is very low grade and there is not
a lot of consumption in Alaska. The department is
comfortable with no tax on "bunker fuel". In 1994 EPA
required Anchorage and Fairbanks to burn clean fuel. Motor
fuel tax should be applicable to everyone and therefore
there should be a motor fuel tax base.
After a brief at ease, Senator Parnell explained amendment
Mr. Bartholomew responded regarding amendment #2. It
referred to section 2(a)(1). Senator Parnell said the title
was too tight to delete section 2(a)(1). Mr. Bartholomew
said he had no concerns regarding amendment #2. Co-chair
Sharp explained his understanding of (f), page 4.
Senator Donley voiced his concern that only Anchorage
residents would be hit with the motor fuel tax. The
Department of Revenue had not taken the time to discern the
impact in Anchorage. Co-chair Sharp referred to the fiscal
note. He said it was not up to the department to control
retail dealers. He asked Mr. Bartholomew to provide the
requested information.
Kim Ross, Executive Director, Alaska Air Carriers was
invited to join the committee. She said the association
opposed HB 63 and she read their opposition statement into
the record. The bill would have an adverse effect on
domestic industry. This industry provided mail, freight,
transportation, passenger, medivac to rural as well as urban
Alaska. She provided direct quotes from MAPCO press release
and the Anchorage Daily News. It was not accurate to
compare jet and motor fuel. Many questions concerning the
bill have gone unanswered. In response to Co-chair Sharp,
Ms. Ross said she had been with the association for ten
years.
Co-chair Sharp advised he would hold HB 63 in committee
until tomorrow at 8:00 a.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Co-chair Sharp adjourned the committee at 11:10 a.m. until
8:00 a.m. tomorrow.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|