Legislature(2005 - 2006)
05/05/2005 04:55 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB61 | |
| HB149 | |
| HB169 | |
| HB211 | |
| HB225 | |
| HB123 | |
| HB215 | |
| SB46 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 61(L&C)
"An Act relating to Calcutta pools and crane classics as
authorized forms of charitable gaming."
This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
4:55:40 PM
Senator Dyson spoke to the concern he had raised during the first
hearing on this bill regarding whether a for-profit entity might
make a business out of helping charities with a Calcutta endeavor.
While the answer had been that the inclusion of the term "operator"
would deter such activity, he has learned that the term "operator"
is simply defined as an entity that is licensed and bonded. Thus,
"there is nothing that would keep enterprising individuals" from
assisting in organizing a sporting event "and making a deal with
some charity to conduct a Calcutta pool. While this activity would
raise money for the charity, for-profit entities could also use
this tactic as "an opportunity" to make money. This has been
experienced in other states; a Calcutta pool was bid up and behind
the scene deals were made in regards to which team would win. While
he hoped that such a scenario would not occur in Alaska, he warned
that it could occur in relationship to major sporting events.
Senator Stedman asked whether the intent was to move the bill from
Committee.
Co-Chair Green affirmed.
Senator Stedman voiced being "uncomfortable with enlarging the
gambling opportunities in the state in general". While he would not
contest moving the bill from Committee, it was unlikely that he
would support it passing from the Senate.
4:58:38 PM
Co-Chair Green understood "the reality" to be that Calcutta games
are occurring in the State. While that does not make that
occurrence okay, this legislation would allow places such as the
Palmer Golf Course to increase their business and raise money for
charitable organizations.
Co-Chair Green asked whether the bill contains a mechanism through
which to account for the money that would be raised during the
auction associated with the event.
SHALON SZYMANSKI, Staff to Representative Lesil McGuire, the bill's
sponsor, responded that Sec. 2 page two lines two through ten
specifies that the event organizer must file a report with the
Department of Revenue upon the conclusion of the event. The
Department of Revenue would develop the report form, which would
require an accounting of the money raised as well as the money
provided to the charity.
5:00:26 PM
Co-Chair Green read the requirements listed in Sec. 2. She asked
for clarification as to timeframe in which the report must be
received by the Department of Revenue.
5:00:32 PM
Ms. Szymanski clarified that the report must be filed after the
event.
5:00:57 PM
Co-Chair Green asked for an example of what information would meet
the "amount and nature of each expense" requirement as specified in
Sec. 2 page two, line eight.
Ms. Szymanski replied that expenses for such things as banners
advertising the event must be reported.
Co-Chair Green asked for further information about the auction that
would occur the night before the sporting event; specifically what
allowable expenses the operator or the host of the event could
conduct.
Ms. Szymanski stated that the auction would usually be held in a
banquet setting the night before the sporting event. The teams
participating in the event would be auctioned off, and people would
bid on the team they believed would win the tournament. After the
conclusion of the sporting event, the high bidder on the winning
team would receive up to 50-percent of the money raised. The
organization holding the event could specify the percent of the
revenue that would be contributed to the charity; it could range
between a minimum of 50-percent and 100-percent of the revenue.
Co-Chair Green asked whether the amount specified for the charity
would be 50-percent of the net or gross revenue.
Ms. Szymanski understood that it would be 50-percent of the money
raised during the auction.
Co-Chair Wilken moved to report the bill from committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, SCS CS HB 61 (L&C) was REPORTED from
Committee with previous indeterminate fiscal note #2 dated April
14, 2005 from the Department of Revenue.
5:04:07 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|