Legislature(2001 - 2002)
05/06/2001 08:32 AM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 58-UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS
CHAIRMAN RANDY PHILLIPS called the Senate Labor & Commerce
Committee meeting to order at 8:32 am and announced HB 58 to be
up for consideration.
MS. REBECCA GAMEZ, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Labor and
Workforce Development, testified that HB 58 is much like SB 30
that was before the committee a few weeks ago, without the
indexing.
This bill will increase the maximum weekly benefit
amount to $320 over a three-year period from $248 in
the first year to $272; in year two from $272 to $296;
and in year three from $296 to $320; then the $320
would stay in statute.
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked what the costs were to the employers as
opposed to the costs to the employees.
MS. GAMEZ replied that it's an estimated cost over a six-year
period of about $10 million - $8 million would be employer
contributions and $2 million would be worker contributions. She
said this was in reference to the private sector and the fiscal
notes speak to the University and the Department of
Administration.
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked what the percentage match was for
employer an employee for unemployment insurance.
MS. GAMEZ replied that it's an 80/20 split. She said it's capped
at roughly $150 for worker contribution.
MR. RON HALL, Director, Employment Security Division, explained,
"Over the six-year period to 2008 when it's fully in place, the
impact of the taxes is raised for the average employer by $51 per
employee per year."
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked if there was any opposition to this bill.
MS. GAMEZ replied that the only opposition that she's aware of is
that the State Chamber of Commerce did a survey and then revised
their opposition and said they would support "one bump up." She
said the department hadn't received any complaints and had
actually received a lot of input from claimants who say that it's
not enough to get them through times of seasonal unemployment.
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked if Alaska was number 50 of the states
that have passed legislation like this.
MS. GAMEZ replied, "Yes."
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS asked if they would pass this, where would
Alaska be in the rankings.
MS. GAMEZ replied that we would be at the lower end of the
middle.
MR. HALL said that it's a moving target, "Other states will be
going up. We'll still be in the bottom third."
MS. GAMEZ replied that we would be in the top of the bottom third
if things stay as they are today.
SENATOR AUSTERMAN asked what "one bump up" meant to the Chamber
of Commerce.
MS. GAMEZ replied that she thought it meant that they were
supportive of the bump from the current $248 to the $272.
MR. DON ETHERIDGE, Alaska State AFL-CIO, said he supported HB 58.
"Many of our members pointed out that there is a lot of seasonal
employment and they just cannot make it on the rate that's being
paid right now."
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS said:
I'm a little hesitant on this bill, not because of the
subject matter in the bill, but because of the short
notice on the effects of the employers and not having
them here to testify either for or against or at least
list their concerns…
SENATOR DAVIS moved to pass CSHB 52(L&C) from committee with
individual recommendations with the attached fiscal note. There
were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|