Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 17
02/10/2011 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB10 | |
| HB102 | |
| HB57 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 102 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 57-BICYCLE PROGRAM
1:55:33 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 57, "An Act authorizing municipalities and
nonprofit organizations to sponsor a program to encourage the
safe use of bicycles as a mode of transportation, and amending
the duties of the Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities to include administration of state funds appropriated
for that purpose."
1:56:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PAUL SEATON, Alaska State Legislature, testifying
as prime sponsor of HB 57, explained that this bill would create
a safe bicycle ridership program in DOT&PF. This bill would
allow municipalities and not-for-profit organizations the
opportunity to apply for grant funding for the purpose of
promoting bicycle use, distribution and maintenance of bicycles,
bicycle helmets, bicycle facilities, and bicycle trailers. He
commented that he would request an amendment to change the
dates.
1:57:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON explained that affordable transportation
has been an issue in Alaska. This bill is designed not for
recreational transportation, but to promote transportation
alternatives, which is why some additional things such as
helmets and trailers are included. He offered that it is great
to encourage people to use a bicycle to and from the grocery
store, but people need to have a means to carry their groceries
home. Under this program, communities would apply for funds to
meet specific community needs such as a bike share program, for
hubs, training programs, voucher programs, or outreach.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON remarked that Anchorage and Juneau have
bike programs. Juneau's "Bikes, Bikes, Bikes" program acquires
abandoned bikes through the police department and donations from
the community. A local youth center paints them one color and
loans them out. He pointed to letters of support in members'
packets.
1:59:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG referred to page 3, line 8 of HB 57,
noting the date would be changed from 2012 to 2014. He referred
to page 3, line 4, of the bill, noting the date would be changed
from 2011 to 2012. He asked for clarification.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON agreed with the date changes.
2:00:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG stated that the original bill [from a
prior year] contained a bike trail program, which is not in this
bill.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON agreed that the bike trail program became
problematic so the bill defers to the individual community to
figure out what will work best for them.
CHAIR P. WILSON asked for clarification on the individual grant
amounts. She recalled that bicycle trailers range from very
simple to elaborate.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON said he envisioned that the applicants
would apply through the DOT&PF for a competitive grant to
institute their community program, likely ranging from $15,000
to 20,000. He remarked that some communities would need covered
shelters or bicycle racks. The program promotes safe bicycle
practices so individual communities would decide the scope of
their programs. In further response to Chair Wilson,
Representative Seaton agreed that Anchorage might need $100,000
for its proposal whereas a smaller community like Wrangell would
need considerably less.
2:02:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked whether community could request
funding to put racks on municipal buses to enable people to use
bicycles in conjunction with public transportation.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON answered that it would be up to the
community to decide.
2:03:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked whether most communities would have
the ability to pay for programs without using grants.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON answered, "Not necessarily." He offered
that many villages do not have taxing authority and some
bicycles are made for gravel and dirt roads. He related the
purpose is to provide an alternative stimulus for using a mode
of transportation other than four wheelers and pickup trucks.
This bill was not meant as solely an urban solution, but to aid
transportation and to assist in diminishing Alaskan's reliance
on gas and diesel fuels.
2:04:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON pointed out an administrator would be
appointed by the commissioner. He asked for clarification on
the funding source for the grants.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON responded that the funding source would be
through the legislature and from federal matching. He commented
that current trends attempt to foster pedestrian and non fuel
consuming methods of transportation instead of using fuel
operated vehicles. He stated that part of administrator's job
would be to apply for grants, depending on the level of
applicants from rural and urban communities.
2:05:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON clarified that this bill would add person
a person to work to obtain federal funding and request general
funds for the program.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON agreed. He said the request for funding
would be for matching funds or for state funding. This bill
does not allocate funds. The program would be funded using the
normal budget request process.
2:06:48 PM
JEFF OTTESEN, Director, Division of Program Development,
Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF),
provided the background on bicycling in Alaska. He said that
clearly safety is the biggest issue, in the past ten years the
DOT&PF statistics indicate an average of two fatalities per year
and 19 major injuries. He said two fatalities does not sound
significant, but represents twice as many fatalities as road
rage causes in Alaska. He reported that no one cause is
paramount with many reasons for fatalities.
MR. OTTOSEN also reported that Alaska is sixth in nation as a
means of using bicycles for transportation to and from work. He
concluded that bicycling is important in Alaska, noting the
statistics have held up over the past several census cycles.
Bicycling ranges above the national average. In 2007, the
DOT&PF provided a strategy in its highway safety plan to reduce
crashes involving bicycles by using public education and
outreach. The DOT&PF has found the federal training programs
designed to teach how to train bicyclists to be safe highway
users are excellent, but the means to get training out to people
is necessary.
2:09:23 PM
MR. OTTOSEN referred to HB 57, noting that the bill does not
mention training or education. He offered his belief that would
be an important addition to the grant program. He reported that
the DOT&PF has a parallel program, Safe Routes to School, which
is a federally funded program limited to an area no more than
two miles from the school focused on grades K-8. The program
does not reach the entire population in the state. The Safe
Routes to School has been successful and many communities
encouraged bicycle use. He referred to a reflector distributed
to members that the department hopes to place in the hands of
every school age child. Every school wants these reflectors, he
said. He reiterated that its program does not address high
school or adults. He advised that the FHWA recommends programs
focus on the five "E" aspects including engineering, education,
encouragement, evaluation, and enforcement. He pointed out that
HB 57 focuses on education, encouragement, and evaluation
practices.
2:11:30 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON asked whether the department could absorb this
program into its current program to avoid any additional general
fund expenditures.
MR. OTTESEN advised that the DOT&PF programs are federally
funded, so DOT&PF's staff must spend time on the eligible
functions in the program. Thus, it is difficult to add in other
elements to its program since staff must certify their time
spent on the eligible criteria for the federally funded program.
2:12:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked whether the DOT&PF appoints an
administrator.
MR. OTTOSEN envisioned that after the first couple of years this
program would require about ten percent of one staff person's
time, which would represent a small fraction of existing staff
time. He introduced his two staff members who are involved with
bicycle programs: Steve Soenksen a Safe Routes to School Program
coordinator, and Bob Laurie, a Bicycle and Pedestrian
Coordinator. Both positions are federally funded and one of
these two staff would be assigned the job as a ten percent duty,
which would be funded by general fund monies, he said. In
further response to Representative Johnson, he explained the
$40,000 in personal services. The first two years would
represent 25 percent of a staff person's time to set up the
program set up, perform outreach, and develop regulations. He
advised that the DOT&PF has several other grant programs and
recognizes the importance of elevating public awareness. It is
necessary to attend meetings and conferences to help educate
people on the program, which is the reason for the extra two-
year effort followed by the 10 percent staff time commitment.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON asked for clarification on the
contractual amount.
MR. OTTOSEN answered that the contractual amounts are focused on
conducting surveys, discovering how people use the program,
basically to obtain feedback for the DOT&PF on how well the
program is working.
2:14:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked for clarification on the contractual
amount, which is for $10,000, but increases to $35,000 in FY 16.
MR. OTTOSEN mentioned that the DOT&PF works with the Department
of Law (DOL) on its regulations so at the start of a program and
every five years thereafter, the department incurs costs to
prepare regulations and updating regulations. In response to
Representative Gruenberg, Mr. Ottesen agreed the department
would like an educational component to the program.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON answered that the Safe Routes to School
Program provides for a training program. He related that the
Department of Law has advised the bill title is for safe
ridership, which would include education and training, but if
the committee would prefer the title to be more specific, he
would not object to amending the bill to include it.
2:16:26 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG recalled testimony on a version of this
program last year. He offered to assist in developing similar
language for HB 57.
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that she would leave public testimony
open on HB 57.
[HB 57 was held over.]
2:17:24 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 10 Sponsor Statement.doc |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 10 |
| HB 10 Support Information.doc |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 10 |
| HB 10 Support Other States.docx |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 10 |
| HB0010A.PDF |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 10 |
| HB 57 backup DOT.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB010-TRA-DOA-DMV-02-04-11.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 10 |
| HB 57 Burnett letter of support.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Kennedy Letter of support.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Bikes Program Description.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057-DOT-AS-2-4-11.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| Anchorate Palmer Wasilla Plan.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Paperman support.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Lindholm support.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB57 Sponsor Statment.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB57 text (2).pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 102 fiscal Note DOA.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/22/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102 fiscal Note DOR.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/22/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102 Governors Sponsor.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/22/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102 Sectional.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/15/2012 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/22/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 102 |
| HB 102 text.pdf |
HTRA 2/10/2011 1:00:00 PM HTRA 3/22/2012 1:00:00 PM |
HB 102 |