Legislature(2001 - 2002)
02/27/2002 01:45 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 56
An Act relating to minimum wages.
Representative Hudson MOVED work draft #22-LS0342\L, Craver,
2/21/02, as the version before the Committee. There being
NO OBJECTION, it was adopted.
CHIP WAGONER, ALASKA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE, JUNEAU, testified
in support of the minimum wage bill as proposed.
Mr. Wagoner advised that the Alaska Catholic Conference at
its meeting on September 21, 2001, adopted a petition
supporting an increase in Alaska's minimum wage.
The Catholic Church's support for a minimum wage is not new.
The Church advocated for the establishment of a minimum wage
law as early as 1919, nearly two decades prior to its'
passage.
Mr. Wagoner stated that minimum wages are paid for work
done. Work is more than just a job. Work is a way to:
· Participate in God's creation;
· Contribute to the common good;
· Promote human dignity;
· For people to meet their material needs,
commitments and obligations.
The Church's teachings promote the concept of a living wage,
a wage adequate for workers to provide for themselves and
their families in dignity.
Mr. Wagoner pointed out that the minimum wage amount of
$7.15 is not a living wage. If a person worked 40 hours a
week, 52 weeks a year at $7.15, they would earn $14,872
dollars, which is below the poverty threshold for a family
of two. Although, he pointed out that, as an increase in
the minimum wage is not a living wage, it is a step toward
the right direction.
Mr. Wagoner concluded that an incentive in the minimum wage
would disproportionately benefit women, minorities and the
nation's poor.
Representative Davies asked if the committee substitute was
identical to the initiative.
LINDA SYLVESTER, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE PETE KOTT, replied
that the petition initiative was exactly contained in HB 56
in its current form. It is the intention of the sponsor
that HB 56 is identical to the initiative petition. Once it
is passed, it would be sufficient to void the initiative
petition.
Representative Lancaster asked if that would be an automatic
procedure.
Ms. Sylvester explained that once it is passed, it would go
to the Lt. Governor for review. In conjunction with the
Attorney General, the decision would be made.
Representative Foster MOVED to report CS HB 56 (FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal notes.
Vice-Chair Bunde OBJECTED. He stated that he preferred that
the decision go through the public process weighing in on
the initiative process.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Moses,
Whitaker, Williams
OPPOSED: Croft, Davies, Bunde
Co-Chair Mulder was not present for the vote.
The MOTION PASSED (7-3).
CS HB 56 (FIN) was reported out of Committee with
"individual recommendations" and with a zero fiscal note #1
by Department of Administration and fiscal note #2 by
Department of Health & Social Services.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|