Legislature(1993 - 1994)
03/11/1993 03:00 PM House L&C
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 54: TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION Number 520 MARIANNE KERR testified via teleconference on her own behalf in support of HB 54. She stated she wants to be able to choose who has knowledge of her phone number and address as she is a single parent with a small child at home. Number 530 TOM ROY, ALASKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, testified via teleconference in opposition to HB 54. He pointed out that caller identification service can never be a reality in Alaska if HB 54 becomes law. Mr. Roy further stated that the expense involved in producing and maintaining a list of the choices customers make is great and the time lag between the time a person gets a phone hooked up and the publication of the next telephone book is published can be more than a year. Number 588 CHAIRMAN HUDSON asked how the numbers would be presented on phones and when this new technology could realistically be available in Alaska. MR. ROY explained that the numbers would appear right on the screen for the receiving party to see and the technology is about a year away from being installed. Number 602 REP. PORTER asked how random dialing would circumvent this bill. MR. ROY answered that telemarketers sometimes employ computers to randomly call numbers and they don't differentiate between those who want to be called and those that don't. TAPE 93-20, SIDE B Number 000 REP. PORTER noted that he's heard a number of down-sides on the function of caller ID but hasn't heard any of the advantages. MR. ROY replied that the most obvious one is that of harassing phone calls. No longer would someone have the anonymity of calling and not having the receiving party know where the person is calling from. Number 062 REP. BROWN asked if a person's unlisted number would be disclosed under the caller ID system. Number 077 MR. ROY replied yes. Number 081 CATHY SCHINDLER, PROGRAM DIRECTOR, ABUSED WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS (AWAIC), testified via teleconference in support of HB 54. Ms. Schindler noted that the number one service that AWAIC provides is a safe shelter. Ms. Schindler said that within the caller identification system any subscriber would be able to determine that a woman was at the shelter if she called from a shelter phone. This puts the woman, children, and shelter workers at risk. MS. SCHINDLER further testified that it is essential that all shelters be provided with a caller ID blockage at no charge. Number 123 CHAIRMAN HUDSON discussed some of the verbiage in the bill. REP. MACKIE noted that someone could block his caller ID and make harassing telephone calls without any repercussions. REP. BROWN answered that while that was true, there were other ways of finding out the telephone number of a persistent harasser; i.e., putting a trace on the call. Number 190 REP. PORTER noted that the technology is there to trace calls but it has to be established by due process. Number 197 REP. MULDER asked who provides the list of those who do not wish to be called. REP. BROWN responded that it would be the local exchange or any company that produces a telephone book. Number 217 CINDY SMITH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA NETWORK ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, testified in support of HB 54, especially Section 1. Ms. Smith stated that in seeking help and safe shelter one of the most important facilities a victim has is a telephone. Up until now a victim could safely and privately arrange for shelter, and safely make contact with her batterer regarding finances, issues of the children, etc. Ms. Smith noted that unregulated caller ID will have a tremendous adverse impact on the network and the victims that seek shelter there. MS. SMITH noted that in other states the costs per customer for caller ID runs anywhere from $2 to $7. Number 305 REP. PORTER asked how many people wanted this service in the states studied. MS. SMITH replied that between 4 to 8 percent of residential homes wanted this service. It's primary usage is for business. Number 342 CHAIRMAN HUDSON announced that the chair would take one more person to testify on SJR 27 and then he would hold the bill over for more backup and to take more testimony in the near future. Number 358 MARCIA MCKENZIE, PROGRAM COORDINATOR, ALASKA COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, testified in support of HB 54. Ms. McKenzie echoed Ms. Smith's testimony.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|