Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/12/2010 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB20 | |
| HB52 | |
| HB354 | |
| HB344 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 174 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 344 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 354 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 52
"An Act authorizing psychological counseling for
jurors serving in criminal trials who are traumatized
by graphic evidence or testimony."
REPRESENTATIVE BETH KERTTULA, SPONSOR, explained that the
bill was proposed as a result of a very courageous
constituent and her involvement as a juror in a very
traumatic court case. Representative Kerttula explained the
process of trying to find counseling for jurors who have
experienced trauma. She concluded that legislation would be
the best course of action. She reported that she has worked
with the courts to come up with a plan for counseling if a
judge feels the trial was a particularly gruesome,
difficult case.
Senator Olson asked if other states have this type of
legislation. Representative Kerttula shared that Texas has
legislation pending, but has not implemented it yet. King
County also has a juror counseling program.
Co-Chair Stedman noted a fiscal note for $15,000 in general
funds.
9:28:39 AM
MINDY LOBAUGH, JUNEAU, read a prepared statement:
Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, thank you
for this opportunity and all you do for the State of
Alaska.
This bill represents a bridge, a bridge that I and
many other jurors did not have at the end of a very
traumatic trial. You arrive at the courthouse, given
detailed instruction of what is expected of you as a
juror and how the process of a trial works. What the
court system does not do is transition the juror out
of the trial. It is not uncommon to have major
criminal trials run for many days.
I served as a juror on the Rachelle Waterman trial 4
years ago and it lasted approximately 10 days. For me
I arrived open and ready to do my civic duty as a
Juror. And for 10 days prosecutors went into
excruciating detail to help the jurors relive the
events of an unsuspecting Mother getting abducted from
her home, tortured and finally murdered.
It was then our duty as jurors to determine if the
defendant, her daughter was guilty of masterminding
this tragedy against her own mother, a woman who was a
pillar of her community. By the end of the trial I
left there as a victim feeling closed, mentally
battered and very traumatized by the burden of
knowledge I now carried.
I am here to tell you the media does not even come
close to covering the depth of this trial. As jurors
we had access to piles of emails detailing out various
ways these men planned to kill the mother, in addition
to physical evidence, photographs and of course the
hours of testimony.
For quite some time during and following that trial
eating for me was a near impossibility because of the
constant nausea I felt. To my friends and family I
became a stranger….and each night I prayed myself to
sleep.
One of my fellow jury mates was pregnant with her
second child. She had shared her excitement and
ultrasound pictures with us early on. By the end of
the trial she lost her baby and had to be excused from
the trial.
When this trial finally ended, with a hung jury, I
turned to the presiding judge and ask if the courts
offer some kind of counseling or process to help
jurors deal with all this traumatizing information and
help to transition us back to our lives? The answer
was NO.
For me it was like having a door slammed in my face.
There would be no help in transitioning back to my
life before this trial, no bridge. Rather I would have
to move forward with this dark knowledge deeply
entrenched in my mind and the minds of my fellow
jurors. And I will never forget the feeling and look
of disappointment and confusion in my fellow jurors as
we wondered how we would come to terms with this
trial. It was at this point I felt the court system
had failed me as a juror doing my civic duty.
Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, please help me
to build this bridge by supporting HB 52 Post Trial
Jury Counseling. I may not have found closure with
respects to this trial, but maybe you can help build
that bridge for future Jurors doing their civic duty
by passing HB 52.
Representative Kerttula commented on personal experiences
as a lawyer and cases of traumatized jurors. She related
the importance of the bill.
HB 52 was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
9:33:13 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 20 2010 0412 Proposed SCS Version T.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 20 |
| SB 174 2010 0412 Proposed CS SFIN Version D.pdf |
SFIN 4/12/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 174 |