Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/20/2001 01:46 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 52
"An Act relating to the Interstate Compact for Adult
Offender Supervision and the State Council for
Interstate Adult Offender Supervision; amending Rules 4
and 24, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing
for an effective date."
CANDACE BROWER, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS provided information on HB 52. She noted that
the legislation would repeal the current Interstate Compact
for adult offender supervision and replace it with a new
Compact. The old compact was enacted nationally in 1937 and
in Alaska in 1957. The compact governs the state-to-state
transfer and supervision of parolees and probationers. It is
a reciprocal agreement to exchange these persons across
state lines and continue needed supervision. The current
compact is old and outdated. There are currently 2 million
probationers and parolees nationwide. She noted that if
Alaska were one of the first states to enact the compact
that it would have a voice in decisions. The current compact
is not much more than a gentleman's agreement between
states. There is no mechanism for acquiring or maintaining
routine data or structure to adopt rules to enforce
compliance, or adequately consider victims. The
restructuring provides more oversight at state and national
levels and promotes communications between states. Offenders
that cross state lines are overseen by thousands of
different parole and probation officers operating within
hundreds of different agencies. This fragmented system makes
it difficult to account for offenders. The compact creates
an effective management system that addresses public safety
concerns and offender accountability. There have been a
variety of entities working on the legislation. The compact
would go into effect when it has been enacted by 35 states.
The department feels that it is important to be one of the
first 35 states to enact the legislation in order to have a
voice in the rule making process.
Representative John Davies spoke in support of the
legislation and stressed the importance of Alaska's
participation.
Representative Whitaker asked if any states indicated that
they would refuse involvement. Ms. Brower pointed out that
many of the Western states have enacted the legislation.
Fees are based on population and volume. Alaska exports more
offenders than it imports.
Representative Hudson asked if there is anything comparable
with Canada. Ms. Brower stated that there is no similar
agreement with Canada.
In response to a question by Representative Croft, Ms.
Brower observed that there are 343 Alaskan parolees or
probationers being supervised outside of Alaska. There are
220 parolees or probationers from other states being
supervised in Alaska.
MICHAEL STARK, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW
provided information on the legislation. He pointed out that
there is no way for the state to enforce rule violations
under the current compact. The new compact will provide
enforcement mechanisms. He stressed the need to prevent a
dumping of parolees or probationers. The compact is looking
at the establishment of a national registry system to track
all parolees or probationers outside of their states. There
would be an annual report. Alaska would have recourse to
require other states to recall parolees or probationers that
are not authorized in Alaska.
Representative John Davies MOVED to report HB 52 out of
Committee with the accompanying fiscal note. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 52 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with two previously published fiscal
impact notes by the Department of Corrections (#1 and #2).
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|