Legislature(1997 - 1998)
02/26/1997 01:58 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 51
"An Act relating to the Department of Environmental
Conservation."
Representative Davies provided members with a package of
1
amendments for HB 51 (copy on file). Representative Davies
MOVED to adopt Amendment 13. Representative Mulder
OBJECTED. Amendment 13 would delete the existing language
on page 4, line 24 through page 5, line 2 and insert new
language. Representative Davies explained that Amendment 13
would set in place a new set of conditions. Amendment 13
defines the terms; water quality criteria, standards,
natural conditions, and background condition. He stated
that the definitions were taken from a letter by Michelle
Brown, Commissioner, Department of Environmental
Conservation. He maintained that definitions of these terms
are inconsistent in the bill. "Water quality criteria" are
defined as scientific information regarding the maximum
concentrations of specific chemicals or other pollutants in
water which are consistent with the protection of aquatic
life or human health. "Natural condition" would mean the
condition of a water body before human impact. He noted
that the State adopts criteria used by the Environmental
Protection Agency. He maintained that the State does not
have the scientific apparatus to perform the research
necessary to establish criteria independently. He explained
that the definitions in Amendment 13 provide the basis for
other amendments. Representative Davies noted that
Amendment 13 was not reviewed by the Legal Services
Division, Legislative Affairs Agency.
Co-Chair Hanley asked the rationale of including "legally
enforceable state-established requirements" in the
definition of "standards". Representative Davies noted that
the language was used by the Department of Environmental
Conservation. Representative Davies pointed out that a
"standard" is something that is legally enforceable. Co-
Chair Hanley noted that "standards" are state-established
requirements. He questioned if "legally enforceable" is
necessary under law.
Representative Rokeberg objected to Amendment 13. He
observed that he had not had sufficient time to review the
amendments. Discussion ensued regarding further review of
the amendments. Representative Grussendorf suggested that
the legislation be reviewed in subcommittee. Representative
Rokeberg urged Committee action. Representative Mulder
requested review by the Legal Services Agency.
Representative Rokeberg noted that Amendment 13 is
conceptual. He suggested the amendment may have drafting
problems.
Co-Chair Therriault observed that members would like time to
further review the proposed amendments.
HB 51 was HELD in Committee for further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|