Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
03/18/2019 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s): Real Estate Commission | |
| HB48 | |
| HB44 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 48 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 44 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 48- TEMP STATE EMPLOYEES IN PART EXEMPT SVCE
3:52:25 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 48, "An Act removing from the exempt service
of the state persons who are employed in a professional capacity
to make a temporary or special inquiry, study, or examination as
authorized by the governor and including those persons in the
partially exempt service of the state."
3:52:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor of HB 48, introduced the bill and read the following
sponsor statement [original punctuation provided]:
AS 39.25.110(9) was supposed to allow the governor to
appoint someone for some "temporary and special
inquiry". Because they are temporary, exempts do not
get PERS or regular State leave, health insurance or
other State benefits. However, the statute has not
been used in that manner. It has instead been used to
establish positions without the intent of the
positions being temporary, which would then entitle
employees to PERS and all other benefits.
The purpose of HB 48 is to discontinue the historical
practice by the Executive Branch of using AS
39.25.110(9) to unilaterally establish highly paid
executive level temporary exempt positions that have
no salary limits. There are positions established many
years ago using this statute that still exist today.
Some are unbudgeted and do not appear in agency
position counts. Several attempts have been made to
obtain a complete list of these positions and current
salary levels, but these attempts have been
unsuccessful.
HB 48 is intended to eliminate the establishment of
"temporary exempt" positions and instead place these
positions in the partially exempt service. Persons may
be "appointed" to partially exempt positions, however,
they will be subject to salary limits like all other
state employees. HB 48 will force the administration
to be more transparent and allow all employees to be
treated fairly.
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON addressed the 0-dollar fiscal note, which
she said could be interpreted as the administration either
attempting to withhold their exempt positions or expressing
indifference because it doesn't impact them.
3:54:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN expressed concern that the words "exempt"
and "temporary exempt" were being used interchangeably. After
looking at the statute, she said, it appeared that the current
bill speaks to those under AS 39.25.110(09) [Exempt Service;
persons employed in a professional capacity to make a temporary
or special inquiry, study or examination as authorized by the
governor], which are temporary; however, they were being
referred to as exempt. She continued by saying that referencing
those positions as exempt is precarious because exempt positions
are a much broader category. Alaska's deputy attorney general,
for example, is an exempt position and isn't temporary in
nature. She asked if the term or phrasing for that subcategory
should be "temporaries."
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON acknowledged that it was one specific area
of statute that would be eliminated and deferred to her staff,
Remond Henderson.
3:56:30 PM
REMOND HENDERSON, Staff, Representative Tammie Wilson, Alaska
State Legislature, on behalf of Representative Wilson, prime
sponsor of HB 48, stated that the current bill was specifically
designed to address only those temporary exempt positions
established by AS 39.25.110(09).
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN surmised that the current bill was
intended for political appointees that were hired for a specific
purpose. She suggested including a timeframe that would dictate
the length of their temporary employment. She asked if
Representative Wilson had considered that.
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON replied that she was unsure because the
administration was not responsive. She reflected on a phone
call from an anonymous caller who informed her of a position in
Anchorage that was being paid an "exorbitant" amount and had no
Position Control Number (PCN), adding that this particular
position was not political. She explained that if the
governor's office had extra money and wanted to hire someone as
a temporary employee there would be no way to find that
position. Alternatively, they could be put into a PCN and,
unlike others who wouldn't go through this process, designated
to the correct job classification with a corresponding salary
and benefits. However, under AS 39.25.110(09) someone could be
making twice as much as another individual with the same job
title, solely because they were hired by the governor under that
specific part of the statute. She opined that this should not
be happening, and it was time for it to end.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN related that she shared Representative
Wilson's concern. She restated her suggestion of putting a one
or two-year timeframe on temporary exempt positions. She
pointed out that the process to make a position exempt exists
under that same statute, which involves going through the
personnel board, classification, and a public notice period. It
still allows an individual to be appointed, she noted, and avoid
the probationary period that one would encounter with a
classified job. She questioned whether defining how long
'temporary' was would mitigate those temporary hires that end up
working for 10-years off the books with no PCN.
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON emphasized that she was more concerned
with the hidden employee names and funds than the temporary
aspect. She offered her belief that, originally, the statute
was for projects that required hiring someone for a short amount
of time who would be paid more for their "specialized
knowledge;" however, the way it's been used over time has
strayed from that initial intent. She opined that as long as
this particular part of the statute exists it will continue to
be abused. She further noted that adding a timeframe of 3 or 6
months would not help designate a specific salary to these
positions, like most jobs have. She pointed out that this would
not take away the [governor's] ability to write a specific
contract for someone.
4:00:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked for an example of the type of job
being discussed.
MR. HENDERSON described a unit within the Department of
Corrections (DOC) called an "investigative unit" under which
they established temporary exempt positions titled "Professional
Conduct Investigator" using the aforementioned statute. He
stated that the position received 173,000 dollars in salary and
benefits and further noted that it was created in FY 17 and
existed until the current commissioner cut it from the FY 20
budget.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES posited that temporary exempt positions do
not receive benefits.
4:02:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON acknowledged that they are not supposed to
receive benefits under the statute's original intent; however,
it's not being utilized accordingly.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES surmised that there are some employees who
receive a salary and benefits but are off the books and have no
PCN. She asked if this was correct.
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON replied that some positions do have a PCN
while others do not. She explained that if the governor's
office had money left in their budget, they could hire someone
underneath AS 39.25.110(09) and not give them a PCN. She noted
that positions like that, which you can't find in the budget
books, are what makes things difficult.
4:03:33 PM
MR. HENDERSON added that some [positions] are identified, for
example, by a letter "T" in front of the last 3 letters of the
PCN. He stated that the only way to truly figure out how many
of those positions exist is to contact each department and ask
them to provide that information. He explained that the current
bill moves one particular part of the statute AS 39.25.110(09)
[persons employed in a professional capacity to make a temporary
or special inquiry, study or examination as authorized by the
governor] from Exempt Service [AS 39.25.110] to Partially Exempt
Service [AS 39.25.120], which subjects the appointment to a pay
plan that is established under statute. He further noted that
the governor can still appoint someone up to a step F, unless
there are extenuating circumstances that can justify the need
for a higher paying position. The difference, he said, is that
someone would no longer be able to be placed in a high paying
position without a rationale.
4:05:31 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked who would approve the hire if the
administration wanted to employ someone beyond a step F.
MR. HENDERSON offered his belief that it was reviewed by the
personnel board. Nonetheless, he said he would follow up with
clarification from the Department of Administration, Division of
Personnel and Labor Relations.
4:07:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FIELDS revealed that he had asked Legislative
Finance and the administration to account for the personnel cost
of political appointees in the executive branch and never
received a response. He acknowledged that he had been a
political appointee himself and understands that they are an
important part of the democratic process; however, everyone has
a right to understand how the executive branch is organized. He
expressed his appreciation for the current bill in the interest
of transparency.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX acknowledged that knowing the personnel cost of
political appointees in the executive branch would be helpful
information to have. She suggested that Representative Wilson
follow up on that request.
4:07:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON asserted that she had already requested
that information multiple times, which is why she had looked
forward to seeing the fiscal note from the Department of
Administration to see if they would list any of the appointed
positions. She concluded that the governor would be okay with
the current bill's proposed changes due to the lack of response.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX stated that she was having a difficult time
comprehending why there is a 0-dollar fiscal note, adding that
it should probably be a negative fiscal note. She said she was
hopeful that by the bill's next hearing the administration would
provide an explanation.
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON noted that the bill was going to the House
Finance Committee next where they would probably ask the same
question.
4:08:54 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL inquired as to Alaska's statutory definition of
"exempt" and "partially exempt." He noted the importance of
accounting for employee positions and salaries in the budget,
adding that it should be "a basic condition of transparency."
REPRESENTATIVE WILSON agreed to follow up on the definitions.
She mentioned that the last time she went through the budget she
found two people with the same PCN number, which she thought to
be strange.
4:10:12 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 4:10 p.m.
4:11:11 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX announced that HB 48 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Tavoliero_Redacted.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
Commission Hearing: Michael Tavoliero |
| HB044 Sectional Analysis 2.26.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Sponsor Statement 2.26.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 ver A 3.15.19.PDF |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Supporting Document-Support Letters 2.26.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Supporting Document-Support Letter National ATM Council 3.15.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| 2019.HB 44.Backup Support Letters.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Additional Document-ATM Location Study 3.15.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB048 Sponsor Statement 3.4.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 48 |
| HB0048 ver M 3.4.19.PDF |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 48 |
| HB 48 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 48 |