Legislature(2019 - 2020)ADAMS ROOM 519
03/28/2019 09:00 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Consideration of Governor's Appointees: John Sturgeon, Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority, Board of Trustees | |
| HB77 | |
| HB48 | |
| SB38 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 48 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 77 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 53 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 38 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 48
"An Act removing from the exempt service of the state
persons who are employed in a professional capacity to
make a temporary or special inquiry, study, or
examination as authorized by the governor and
including those persons in the partially exempt
service of the state."
9:10:18 AM
Co-Chair Wilson reviewed that public testimony had been
opened and closed earlier in the week. She reported that
one amendment had been brought to her office.
Co-Chair Wilson MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1, 31-LS0346\M.1
(Wayne, 3/25/19) (copy on file):
Page 1, line 4, following "state":
Insert "; repealing the authority of the governor or a
designee of the governor to authorize higher pay than
is otherwise allowable for certain partially exempt
employees in the executive branch; and providing for
an effective date"
Page 1, line 9:
Delete "is"
Insert "and AS 39.27.011(k)are"
Page 1, following line 9:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"*Sec. 3. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is
amended by adding a new section to read:
APPLICABILITY: LIMITED EFFECT OF REPEAL. The repeal of
AS 39.27.011(k) by sec. 2 of this Act applies to
employment contracts entered into on or after the
effective date of sec. 2 of this Act.
*Sec. 4. This Act takes effect immediately under AS
O1.10.070(c)."
Representative Josephson OBJECTED for discussion.
REMOND HENDERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE TAMMIE WILSON,
explained that HB 48 moved temporary positions established
under AS 39.25.110(9) from exempt service where there were
no salary limits, to partially exempt service where there
was an established pay plan. He noted it was a step in the
right direction; however, there was a subsection (k) under
AS 39.27.011 where the pay plan for state employees was
established, that allowed the governor or a designee of the
governor on a case-by-case basis to hire an employee at a
higher pay than Step F. Although, under HB 48, there would
be more transparency when the positions were filled, there
would be very few salary limitations.
Mr. Henderson elaborated that written justification was
required to hire employees at a higher step; however, it
only required the approval of the governor or governor's
designee. The amendment would delete subsection (k), which
would limit the amount paid to newly hired temporary
employees. He clarified that the change would apply only to
employment contracts entered into after the effective date
that AS 39.27.110(9) was repealed. He relayed the change
would not impact the salary of existing employees or
individuals hired prior to the bill's effective date.
Representative Josephson asked for an example of an
employee in the last 20 years that the bill and amendment
would have limited in pay and by moving them to partially
exempt status [if it had been law at the time].
Mr. Henderson asked if the question was whether there had
been an attempt to move someone from exempt service to
partially exempt service.
Representative Josephson clarified he was trying to get a
sense of the who the target was.
Co-Chair Wilson underscored they were not talking about any
specific individual. She explained that the bill increased
transparency. She detailed that currently the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) underneath the Office of the
Governor could sign off on their justification. She wanted
to make sure a new hire did not begin with a salary of
$300,000. The amendment would cap the salary for new hires.
For example, if a person was replacing someone who had been
in the position for 20 years, the new person would not
receive the outgoing person's salary.
9:14:22 AM
Representative Josephson remarked he was not trying to
identify a specific person. He was asking about the title
or description of the staff person or employee. He asked if
it was possible to ensure that a future governor could hire
someone like Keith Meyer [former president of the Alaska
Gasline Development Corporation].
Mr. Henderson responded that if the governor were to hire
someone like Mr. Meyer, there were a number of avenues to
take. The governor could hire through the exempt service
where there were no hiring limitations. He explained that
the bill was primarily designed to address temporary
employees. He assumed the example by Representative
Josephson would apply to a position that was more permanent
in nature.
Representative Josephson WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There
being NO further OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was ADOPTED.
9:15:17 AM
AT EASE
9:16:16 AM
RECONVENED
Representative Carpenter asked to hear from the
administration on how it would be impacted by the bill.
KATE SHEEHAN, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF PERSONNEL SERVICES,
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, asked Representative
Carpenter to repeat the question.
Representative Carpenter complied. He asked if the change
limited the administration's ability to hire the technical
or subject matter expertise it needed.
Ms. Sheehan asked if Representative Carpenter was referring
to the amendment or the bill.
Co-Chair Wilson clarified the amendment had passed.
Ms. Sheehan replied that amending the statute to remove the
"special k" [subsection (k)] exception would still allow
the administration to hire someone at an advanced step
placement. She detailed that the pay schedule included
steps A through F and pay increments beginning with J and
above. The subsection (k) exception had allowed the
administration to hire someone at a pay increment level.
She clarified that the administration would still have the
ability to bring someone in above step A through step F.
Representative Carpenter stated that without understanding
who had been hired in the past, it was difficult for him to
determine what the bill's impact would be. He was trying to
determine what the administration would no longer have the
ability to do if the bill was implemented.
Ms. Sheehan replied that the [section (k)] exception had
been used, but she did not know how frequently. Currently
the exception only pertained to partially exempt employees.
She clarified that exempt employees could still be brought
in at any salary deemed appropriate. Partially exempt
employees included directors and deputy commissioners; the
category was exempt from some, but not all, of the
personnel rules. She explained that for partially exempt
employees, the bill would restrict the administration to
following the personnel rules, which allow for advanced
step placement for exceptional qualifications or
recruitment difficulties. She did not know the number of
employees that had been brought in under the exception.
9:19:58 AM
Representative Tilton stated her understanding from Mr.
Henderson's testimony that existing partially exempt
employees would be grandfathered in under the current
system and that the bill would only apply to future hires.
Mr. Henderson replied in the affirmative.
Representative Josephson asked for verification that the
executive branch would still have the ability to hire
someone at its discretion on contract. He noted the person
would not be eligible for benefits because they would be on
contract.
Mr. Henderson responded affirmatively.
Co-Chair Wilson asked staff to review the fiscal note.
Mr. Henderson addressed the zero fiscal note from DOA. He
assumed the note was zero because the department did not
anticipate any costs associated with implementing the bill.
He also assumed the department had not put forth any cost
savings because it could not yet project what the savings
would be. He relayed there would be some cost savings as
people left positions and new people were hired [at lower
salaries].
9:21:36 AM
Vice-Chair Johnston MOVED to REPORT HB 48(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
There being NO OBJECTION, HB 48(FIN) was REPORTED out of
committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with one
previously published zero fiscal note: FN1 (ADM).
9:22:07 AM
AT EASE
9:22:45 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| John Sturgeon_Redacted.pdf |
HFIN 3/28/2019 9:00:00 AM |
Confirmation |
| HFC 3.8.19 HB 53 - FY2019 Disaster Relief Supplemental Overview.pdf |
HFIN 3/28/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 53 SB 38 SB 38 HFIN March 28 2019 |
| HB048 ver M Am#1 3.27.19.pdf |
HFIN 3/28/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 48 |
| HB 53 3.8.19 OMB Response.pdf |
HFIN 3/28/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 53 SB 38 |