Legislature(1995 - 1996)
05/06/1995 01:00 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 44
"An Act providing that a political use is not an
authorized use of charitable gaming proceeds;
prohibiting the contribution of charitable
gaming proceeds to candidates for certain public
offices, their campaign organizations, or to political
groups; providing that a political group is not a
qualified organization for purposes of charitable gaming;
relating to what is a qualified organization for the
purpose of charitable gaming permitting; and providing
for an effective date."
Tom Anderson, Legislative Aide to Representative Martin, was
invited to join the committee to testify.
Senator Phillips MOVED to adopt SCSCSHB 44, version "U". No
objections being heard, SCSCSHB 44 was ADOPTED.
Mr. Anderson noted the changes to the work draft. The first
change allows public access to records on charitable gaming
permits. He noted the change on page 3, lines 3-13, which
removed double reporting. Page 5, line 13-15 further
qualifies and defines groups that cannot receive charitable
game monies. Page 6, lines 22-26, a political organization
is defined. The language was provided by legal services, as
a technicality. Finally, Section 14 and 15 allows the public
access to public record, in the Dept of Revenue, Charitable
Gaming, regarding reports by permittees, licensees, and
vendors.
Senator Zharoff asked what charitable gaming has to do with
political parties? Co-chair Halford explained that it
expands the definition of political groups in terms of
campaign contribution prohibition as broad as possible, but
still be a group. It leaves out individual candidates
operating on their own. Otherwise, it broadens the coverage
of the prohibition on contributions.
Co-chair Halford reiterated the changes in the CS work
draft. He stated that the first change proposed in the CS
is to eliminate duplication. The second, is to broaden the
definition of a political organization to include a campaign
committee. The third, is to make all the reports of the
Division of Charitable Gaming public record. This was done
because when they moved to the Dept of Revenue, they ceased
being public records under another provision. They were
public in Dept of Commerce and Economic Development. He
noted the last change, is the definition of net proceeds,
where they may or may not be distributed.
Senator Rieger put forth a technical question regarding
raffles. He noted that in the bill, raffles is referred to
as a form of charitable gaming. On page 5, it says, "that
any portion of the net proceeds of a charitable gaming
activity". Co-chair Halford clarified that raffles are
separately defined in Section 8, page 5.
Co-chair Frank MOVED to adopt an amendment which replaces
the language on page 3, lines 14-17. He stated that the
intent is that it is not the intent to take money out of
their accounts, but rather, to have the books examined. No
objections being heard, the amendment was ADOPTED.
Senator Sharp MOVED to adopt SCSCSHB 44 (FIN) with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal note.
Senator Zharoff OBJECTED. The question is, shall SCSCSHB 44
(FIN) MOVE out of committee with individual recommendations
and attached fiscal note? No further objection being heard,
SCSCSHB 44 (FIN) REPORTED OUT of committee with a "do pass"
and attached fiscal note of $46.5 from the Dept of Revenue.
Co-chairs Halford and Frank, along with Senators Phillips,
Sharp and Rieger recommended "do pass"; Senator Zharoff
recommended "no recommendation".
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|