Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
03/11/2021 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB62 | |
| HB44 | |
| HB62 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 44 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 106 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 62 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 44-PRACTICE OF ACCOUNTING; LICENSURE
3:19:54 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 44, "An Act relating to the practice of
accounting."
3:20:10 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 44, labeled 32-LS0302\B, Fisher, 3/8/21,
as the working document.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected for the purpose of discussion.
3:21:14 PM
LYNETTE BERGH, Staff, Representative Steve Thompson, reviewed
the changes to HB 44, proposed in the CS, Version B, on behalf
of Representative Thompson, prime sponsor. She explained that
Version B removes the language "or compilation" on page 8, line
4; removes the language "the board" and inserts "the department"
on page 8, line 28; and removes the language "or compilation
reports" on page 20, line 5. She said these changes were made
at the request of the Alaska Society of Certified Public
Accountants.
3:23:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN withdrew his objection.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS hearing no further objection to the motion
to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 44,
labeled 32-LS0302\B, Fisher, 3/8/21, as the working document,
announced that Version B was before the committee.
3:23:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, Alaska State Legislature, prime
sponsor, introduced CSHB 44(STA). He stated that the bill
originated after members of the Alaska Board of Public
Accountancy contacted his office to share that they had been
asked to update Alaska statutes to meet the Uniform Accountancy
Act and/or AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct by the National
Association of the State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) and the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The
national organizations provided the Board of Public Accountancy
with a summary of areas where Alaska's statutes do not meet the
national standards. The board reviewed those statutes over the
past several years and developed a rough draft for the bill to
address the issues. He conveyed that CSHB 44(STA) incorporates
these changes and would update the public accountancy statutes
to bring Alaska more in line with national standards while
continuing to protect the public interest by ensuring that only
qualified persons are licensed, and that appropriate standards
of competency and practice are established and enforced. He
deferred to Ms. Bergh to provide a sectional analysis of the
bill.
3:26:07 PM
MS. BERGH noted the length of the sectional analysis [included
in the committee packet], which covered 44 sections. She said
many of the items in the sectional are redundant as common
language was added or removed. She offered to provide a summary
of the sectional analysis, which would highlight the changes and
be less time intensive.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS welcomed the sectional summary.
MS. BERGH presented a summarized sectional analysis of the bill
[included in the committee packet], which read as follows
[original punctuation provided]:
The changes in HB44 are intended to better align
Alaska accountancy statutes with national standards,
using the Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA) as a guiding
document. These changes will help ensure a uniform
approach to regulation of the accounting profession in
Alaska. Throughout the current accountancy statutes,
there are antiquated industry terms and definitions.
HB 44 updates the following terms:
? "out-of-state exemption" is removed entirely to
allow for firm mobility
? "Partnership, limited liability company,
corporation, or other legal entity" are replaced with
the term "firm"; the updated definition of firm will
now include sole proprietors
? "quality review" is replaced with "peer review"
? Sections 37-43 updates/adds new definitions for the
following accountancy terms:
o "attest function"
o "compilation service"
o "permit"
o "practice of public accounting"
o "report"
o "state"
o "preparation of financial statements"
3:28:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referred to language in Section 3, page 2,
line 11, which states that the board "may" renew a license
granted under Section 3 if the licensee meets the listed
criteria. She then directed attention to Section 5, which
states that the board "shall" grant a permit on page 2, line 18.
Referring back to page 2, line 11, she asked what discretion the
board would have to renew a license under Section 3 if the
licensee met the statutory criteria.
MS. BERGH deferred to Karen Brewer-Tarver or Thomas Neill to
speak to the technicalities of the bill.
3:30:07 PM
KAREN BREWER-TARVER, Alaska Society of Certified Public
Accountants, said the board would renew a license as long as the
firm met all of the criteria. She clarified that if all the
conditions are met, the board does not have discretion [on
whether to renew a license].
3:31:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE asked if the word "shall" would be more
appropriate since the board does not utilize discretion, to
protect against potential litigation.
MS. BREWER-TARVER said she would have to think more about that
question. She offered her understanding that "shall" could be
used but "may" would allow for more discretion. She explained
that the Uniform Accountancy Act is a template act, which NASBA
and AICPA creates for state boards to look to for best
practices. She deferred to Thomas Neill for further
information.
3:33:39 PM
THOMAS NEILL, Chair, AICPA Uniform Accountancy Act Committee,
informed the committee that the UAA [Uniform Accountancy Act] is
a template for all 55 licensing jurisdictions to align with to
allow for CPAs and CPA firms around the country to act with some
uniformity. Regarding the question of "may" versus "shall," he
recalled seeing some jurisdictions go both directions. He
offered to look more specifically at the entirety of Alaska
statutes to consider the cross-references and follow up with a
more definitive answer at the next hearing for CSHB 44(STA). He
noted that the Uniform Accountancy Act doesn't delve into this
level of specificity, further noting it is left to each state
jurisdiction to enact mobility as best fits their
statutes/rules.
3:35:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN referred to paragraph (3) on page 2, line
16, which states that the board may renew a license issued under
Section 4 if the licensee "complies with the requirements of
this chapter". He asked to what degree the board is competent
to make that determination.
3:36:05 PM
MR. NEILL remarked:
As I've seen through most state legislative acts
relative to how a CPA gets the license, they usually
have a cross-reference like this to make sure that
they are complying with the entirety of what's drafted
in that section of that state's Uniform Accountancy
Act.
MR. NEILL said with regard to complying, when a CPA applies for
a license in Washington there is a set of criteria to consider,
which looks at whether the licensee has met the continuing
education requirements; whether the licensee has other licenses
in or outside the state; whether the licensee has met the peer
review requirements. He shared his understanding that the
language in question is part of a methodology or criteria to
make sure that the licensee is eligible for licensure.
3:37:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN noted that "may" and "shall" are both used
throughout Alaska statutes. He suggested that it would be
helpful to hear perspective from Legislative Legal Services, in
addition to [Mr. Neill's] perspective, on this discussion. He
opined that changing the language to "shall" could be
problematic if it were inconsistent with the practices and
statutes of other professions throughout the state. He posited
the courts would conclude that the legislature changed the
language for some specific reason. He emphasized the importance
of consistency across professions.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON offered to follow up with a legal
opinion.
3:38:53 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that HB 44 was held over.
3:39:10 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS moved that the House State Affairs Standing
Committee delegate the duty of drafting and introducing
committee sponsored legislation to the committee chair for the
duration of the Thirty-Second Alaska State Legislature.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected.
3:40:01 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS explained that he had no real interest in
introducing legislation that's overly divisive. Additionally,
he expressed his desire to consult with every member before
introducing a committee sponsored bill to avoid surprises. He
further noted that he had no immediate anticipation to introduce
any committee sponsored legislation, as it had been used
sparingly in past years.
3:40:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN shared his belief that the current
expectation that the [committee] majority would make that
decision is conducive to discussion and would ensure that the
majority of the committee membership supported [the committee-
sponsored legislation].
3:42:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN expressed his appreciation and respect
for Chair Kreiss-Tomkins for proposing this motion.
Nonetheless, he said he would find it difficult to vote [for a
motion that would] "hand away authority."
[REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN maintained his objection.]
3:42:54 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Tarr, Story,
Claman, and Kreiss-Tomkins voted in favor of the motion to
delegate the duty of drafting and introducing committee
sponsored legislation to the chair of the House State Affairs
Standing Committee. Representatives Eastman, Vance, and Kaufman
voted against it. Therefore, the motion was passed by a vote of
4-3.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 44 Bill Hearing Request 2.23.21.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB44 Sponsor Statement version A.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Sponsor Statement version B.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Bill version A.PDF |
HL&C 5/3/2021 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Bill version B - Blank CS for HB 44.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Sectional Analysis version A.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Sectional Analysis version B.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB44 Additional Information - AKCPA Amendment Memo 3.4.21 .pdf |
HL&C 5/3/2021 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Testimony - Received as of 2.23.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/3/2021 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 106 Hearing Request 3.1.21.pdf |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 106 Sponsor Statement 2.18.21.pdf |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 106 version A.PDF |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 106 Sectional Analysis version A.pdf |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 106 Fiscal Note DPS CJISP.PDF |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 106 Fiscal Note HSS PS.PDF |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 106 DPS Prensentation 3.11.21 Distributed.pdf |
HHSS 5/13/2021 3:00:00 PM HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 106 |
| HB 44 version B- Summary of Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Explanation of changes version A to B.pdf |
HSTA 3/11/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 44 |