Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
05/07/2021 08:00 AM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB40 | |
| HB44 | |
| HB176 | |
| HB58 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 44 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 58 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 40 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 44-PRACTICE OF ACCOUNTING; LICENSURE
8:05:42 AM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that the next order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 44, "An Act relating to the practice of
accounting."
[Before the committee was CSHB 44(STA).]
8:05:58 AM
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor, shared that the proposed legislation would update
Alaska's public accountancy statutes to bring Alaska more in
line with national standards. The updates would help ensure a
uniform approach to the regulation of accounting in Alaska, he
said, which would protect the public's interest.
8:07:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY referred to the term "mobility model,"
which would allow business entities outside the state to provide
services within the state. He asked whether those out-of-state
professions currently pay professional license fees as well as a
business license fee.
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON deferred to Ms. Chambers.
8:08:40 AM
SARA CHAMBERS, Director, Division of Corporations, Business, and
Professional Licensing (CBPL), Department of Commerce,
Community, and Economic Development (DCCED), shared that other
states that have implemented mobility measures have not
experienced a meaningful increase in investigative expenses
targeting out-of-state practitioners. She noted that only those
out-of-state practitioners performing non-attestation functions
would be able to practice without a license; anyone performing
the higher-level attestation functions would be required to have
a license within the state. She compared the proposed
legislation to the Nurse Licensure Compact and said that of the
35 states that have adopted the compact, there have not been any
reports of legitimate, demonstrable problems for the
jurisdiction.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked Ms. Chambers to clarify whether a
professional licensed in another state could provide services in
Alaska without paying licensing fees.
MS. CHAMBERS said, "Yes, that's what this bill is proposing
under certain circumstances." She explained that not all out-
of-state firms or individuals would be able to practice in
Alaska without a license, but there are some practices that
could take place with a business license but not a professional
license.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY asked whether Alaska would waive the fees
for in-state licensees.
MS. CHAMBERS responded, "That is not my understanding." She
explained that a professional's home state bears the
responsibility for due diligence and ensuring public protection.
A professional with an unencumbered license who meets the other
standards within HB 44, she said, could practice within Alaska.
She said the question of equity is addressed by allowing Alaskan
licensees the privilege of practicing in other states.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY wondered whether there is an agreement
between Washington and Alaska regarding mobility.
MS. CHAMBERS responded that under a compact, like the Nurse
Licensure Compact, there's a standard agreement adopted by the
legislatures. Under the less formal "mobility model," she said,
states which meet the national standards for requirements
independently adopt the standards.
8:15:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON reminded committee members that the
purpose of the proposed legislation is to bring Alaska's
statutes up-to-date in order to operate under the same national
standards as other licensing jurisdictions.
8:15:44 AM
KAREN TARVER, CPA, Elgee Rehfeld, LLC, explained that the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants introduced
the practice of "firm mobility" in 2014; since then, 30 of the
55 licensing jurisdictions have adopted it. She said that the
model provides greater oversight by the jurisdictional licensing
boards because a professional is subject to the regulations and
statutes in the state in which the professional is providing
services.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY expressed the view that losing
accreditation does not mean that an individual is no longer able
to practice their profession. He then asked, "Where is the
equitableness of this, and ... where's the arm of enforcement
upon this?"
MS. TARVER responded, "The equity through firm mobility is that
I, as an Alaska CPA, could provide services outside the state as
well [as] in a state that has firm mobility without having to
get a permit in that state." The regulatory oversight, she
said, is ultimately held by the licensee's home state; Alaska
retains the ability to sanction an out-of-state licensee under
Alaska's statutes and regulations. She added that there is a
national database of CPAs, which facilitates a smooth process of
information sharing.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCARTY expressed understanding of the equitable
nature of the mobility model.
8:22:11 AM
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ asked for clarification on the enforcement
mechanism.
8:23:30 AM
MS. CHAMBERS explained that the proposed legislation would
provide explicit language stating that the board has the ability
to relieve a practitioner of the right to practice within the
state; the prohibition would be communicated through the
national database to the licensee's home state.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ asked Ms. Chambers to clarify whether Alaska
would "rely on a national database to protect Alaskans from bad
actors."
MS. CHAMBERS responded that the national database would let all
of the other licensing jurisdictions know of the complaints
against the individual. Alaska's licensing board would
undertake a regular investigation.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ stated that professional licensing is the
enforcement mechanism in the state. She said that she doesn't
understand what the enforcement mechanism is if, as a result of
the proposed legislation, the state no longer requires licensing
of accountants.
MS. CHAMBERS replied that there is a section in the proposed
legislation that would specifically authorize the Board of
Public Accountancy to prohibit someone with an out-of-state
license from being able to practice in Alaska.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ said, "We are, in fact, asking another state
to enforce ... Alaskan licensing practice standards, by adopting
this."
MS. CHAMBERS replied that the Board of Public Accountancy would
be enforcing Alaska's practice standards by prohibiting the out-
of-state individual from practicing within Alaska. She said
that this prohibition would then be communicated to other states
in a manner similar to what is currently done by other state
licensing boards; in the health care profession, she said, a
licensee who is disciplined is reported to the national
database, and other states in which the practitioner is licensed
may investigate the licensee for similar issues. She said that
Alaska would be similarly reliant on other states to determine
whether an accountant is qualified.
CO-CHAIR SPOHNHOLZ said that all healthcare practitioners are
currently required to be licensed in Alaska, and that the state
licensing board may revoke their license at any time. She
suggested that the proposed legislation could mean that Alaska's
licensees would be paying for enforcement against practitioners
in another state. She expressed the belief that the proposed
legislation would give other states control over Alaska
licensing regulations.
8:31:55 AM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked for an example of an out-of-state
practitioner being disciplined within their home state.
MS. CHAMBERS replied that the mechanism has been working for
many years in other states that have adopted the firm mobility
language.
8:33:34 AM
LYNETTE BERGH, Staff, Representative Steve Thompson, Alaska
State Legislature, pointed out that Mr. Neill previously
discussed a case in Washington. He also testified that the
mobility method works, because other licensing jurisdictions are
made aware of any disciplinary actions against a licensee.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked who operates the national database.
MS. CHAMBERS deferred to Ms. Hondolero.
8:35:21 AM
CORI HONDOLERO, Executive Administrator, Board of Public
Accountancy, Divisions of Corporations, Business, and
Professional Licensing, Department of Commerce, Community, and
Economic Development, said that the National Association of
State Boards of Accountancy runs the Accountancy Licensee
Database (ALD), which 55 licensing jurisdictions participate in.
She said that the investigator for Alaska's Board of Public
Accountancy has access to the database.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS said, "I have no confidence that a state like
Alabama would ever be capable of overseeing this or, frankly,
any other, program." He hypothesized about a situation in which
an Alabama licensee failed to live up to standards, and Alabama
subsequently declined to discipline the licensee. He asked what
recourse the Board of Public Accountancy would have.
MS. HONDOLERO replied that Alaska could issue a cease and desist
order prohibiting the out-of-state practitioner from operating
in Alaska.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked what legal threshold would need to be
crossed in order to issue a cease and desist order if there is
no proof of misbehavior in the licensee's home state.
8:37:30 AM
MS. CHAMBERS pointed out that the Board of Public Accountancy is
constantly in the process of determining whether an individual
should be allowed to practice in Alaska. In Representative
Fields' example, she said, the board would independently
determine whether the out-of-state practitioner was allowed to
practice in Alaska. She said that, through use of the database,
Alaska's board can be aware of any issues in other states and
prohibit any individual from practicing within Alaska. She said
that while a licensee's home state could act on the individual's
license, Alaska's board would not be waiting for the other state
to act and could issue a cease and desist order with no other
information.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked whether there would be a mechanism to
require that out-of-state licensees to pay a fee to stay in the
system.
8:40:33 AM
REPRESENTATIVE THOMPSON said that those licensed in Alaska don't
have to pay fees to practice in Washington.
8:40:47 AM
MS. CHAMBERS reminded committee members that license fees cover
the costs of operation for all professional boards in Alaska.
She said that in any program, whenever there's an unlicensed
practice concern, the licensees have to cover that cost. The
bigger pictures, she said, is that there's no mechanism to
recover costs, which is something that has been brought before
the legislature in the past. She said that HB 44 contains a
provision that the board may require that disciplinary costs
against an out-of-state licensee be covered by the defendant,
but other mechanisms would need to be included for the board to
have the ability to receive funding. She stressed that
licensees pay the costs of all investigations, whether or not
the individual is licensed. She said the proposed legislation
would give the board more authority than that which is specified
under current law, allowing the "good actors" to face less
bureaucracy, along with stronger language and oversight for the
"bad actors."
8:43:48 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN asked how many states are aligned in
similar processes.
MS. CHAMBERS pointed out that Ms. Tarver testified that 30
states are already part of the network.
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN asked, "In the 30 other states that are
operating under this model, do we have indications of serious
problems - upon adopting this, have they spun out of control?"
MS. CHAMBERS responded that other states have reported that they
have not had any problems out of the ordinary. They have
reported, she said, that the model reduces bureaucracy without
forgoing jurisdictional authority.
REPRESENTATIVE KAUFMAN asked Ms. Chambers what she thinks of the
proposed legislation in its current form.
MS. CHAMBERS responded that the proposed legislation would be a
good move for Alaska and would help keep Alaska, and Alaskan
firms, competitive with firms in other states.
8:47:30 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked for documentation on the lack of
problems experienced by other states.
MS. CHAMBERS responded that CBPL will work with AICPA on
documentation.
8:48:18 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE asked for more discussion on the issue of
enforcement costs being paid for by license fees.
MS. CHAMBERS explained that CBPL oversees 43 licensing programs
and 21 boards, and that each program and board is funded by fees
from its licensees. She stressed that when someone is
practicing without a license, the licensees cover the costs of
investigations. She said that investigations and appeals, which
can go all the way through the court system, sometimes cost as
much as $100,000, which must be covered by licensees. She said,
"When you hear complaints about licensing fees ... if the fees
go up, that's often because there is a very expensive
investigation and disciplinary action and appeal of that, that
licensees are required by state law to cover - not the bad
actor." She said that CPBL would enjoy the opportunity to look
at legislation to make the system fairer to those licensees who
are practicing in accordance with their licenses.
REPRESENTATIVE SCHRAGE discussed the possibility of legislation
allowing boards to recoup investigation fees from defendants who
are found guilty. He expressed that the national database would
provide transparency in the case of a "bad actor" who moves from
state to state.
MS. CHAMBERS stated her agreement with his comment about the
national database, pointing out that the database currently
exists and is utilized by the State Board of Accountancy.
8:52:42 AM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked Ms. Chambers to talk about enforcement of
the provisions under HB 44.
MS. CHAMBERS said:
"We don't feel the bill needs any enforcement
augmentation, just the fee recovery model, and if
we're able to accomplish that with this bill, that
would be great ... we currently don't have a problem,
don't see a problem, and are not hearing from other
jurisdictions that this is a problem."
CO-CHAIR FIELDS asked whether Ms. Chambers was referring to fee
recovery when she mentioned possible additions to the proposed
legislation.
MS. CHAMBERS said yes.
8:53:47 AM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS suggested looking at the possibility of an
addition to the proposed legislation to address fee recovery.
8:55:12 AM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS opened public testimony on HB 44.
8:55:30 AM
SPACIA STRALEY, CPA, stated her support for HB 44 as the owner
of a small accounting firm in Alaska.
8:56:08 AM
KELLY WARD, CPA, Robinson and Ward, stated her support of HB 44.
8:56:44 AM
KAREN TARVER, CPA, Elgee Rehfeld, LLC, stated that she "wholly
supports" HB 44, and she shared her appreciation for committee
members who are working to ensure that the proposed legislation
"gets it right." She pointed out that AICPA has a website that
addresses firm mobility and contains resources regarding the
experience of other states.
8:57:40 AM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 44.
[HB 44 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 58 v. B 4.22.2021.PDF |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Sponsor Statement v. B 4.22.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Sectional Analysis v. B 4.22.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - Guttmacher Alaska Statistics 2016 3.30.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - Guttmacher Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies February 2015 3.30.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - UCSF Study Newspaper Article 2.11.2011.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Supporting Document - Unintended Pregnancies Study March 2011 3.30.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Additional Document - HRSA Women’s Preventive Services Guidelines.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Additional Document - Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives 4.1.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DHSS-MS 4.9.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DCCED-DOI 4.9.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Fiscal Note DOA-DRB 4.12.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| HB 58 Letters of Support as of 5.6.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM HL&C 5/12/2021 3:15:00 PM HL&C 5/17/2021 3:15:00 PM |
HB 58 |
| SB 40 ver A 3.12.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Sponsor Statement 2.23.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Supporting Document - VSO duties 10.22.20.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Testimony Received 4.25.2021.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Fiscal Note - MVA 3.2.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Letter of Support - Challenge Alaska 3.8.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Letter of Support 3.3.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
SB 40 |
| HB 176 Presentation - Direct Primary Care Coaltion 5.6.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |
| HB 176 Letter of Support - AK Policy Forum, 5.7.21.pdf |
HL&C 5/7/2021 8:00:00 AM |
HB 176 |