Legislature(1999 - 2000)
02/02/2000 01:36 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 43-MUNI.ORDINANCES:POLICE TRAINING SURCHARGE
Number 1283
REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS stated HB 43 is intended to be a housecleaning
measure to HB 261 which increased the amount of crimes with
surcharges. HB 43 is an attempt to correct and clarify how
municipalities enact the surcharges.
HB 43 clarifies that fines and penalties are to be imposed for
criminal violations and not for civil violations. This legislation
also clarifies how municipalities will impose the fines--an
ordinance must be passed to authorize the collection of
surcharges.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR expressed concern that surcharges used for training
police officers in Anchorage and state troopers in Sitka will not
be affected by this legislation.
REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS responded the intent is not to divert funds.
It is up to the Police Standards Council to distribute the money
where it sees a need.
SENATOR ELLIS asked if the Fairbanks North Star Borough opposed
this legislation.
REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS responded there had been a discussion on some
of the wording, but he did not know its position.
SENATOR ELLIS requested the committee ask for the Borough's
position.
MR. SCOTT BRANDT-ERICKSEN, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, stated
Ketchikan feels this legislation is an improvement over the current
law. He expressed concern about the interaction between the way
municipal codes are constructed and the way surcharges are applied.
Ketchikan's code provides a general penalty provision which says
any violation can be subject to a fine up to $500.00 and up to 30
days imprisonment. Anchorage has a fine up to $300.00 and up to 30
days imprisonment or both, and Fairbanks' fine is up to $1000 and
up to 90 days imprisonment or both.
In Anchorage, for most violations imprisonment is not the penalty
and a $10.00 surcharge is imposed, a fine of $50.00 is imposed for
a misdemeanor seeking imprisonment. Other municipalities do not
have codes as well developed and Mr. Brandt-Ericksen would like a
distinction made between the $10.00 and $50.00 surcharges, as to
when and how they are applied.
Number 1993
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR clarified that Mr. Brandt-Ericksen would like to
have the option of a $10.00 surcharge for cases not seeking
incarceration.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR noted the committee does have a letter from the
Fairbanks North Star Borough, and it would like to remain neutral
on this legislation.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR commented that a simple formula may be needed to
standardize surcharges so that one cannot charge a municipal
$1000.00 surcharge when other communities are charging $500.00 for
the same offense.
SENATOR ELLIS asked if the Judiciary Committee was not the right
committee for addressing Mr. Brandt-Ericksen's concern about the
way surcharges are applied rather than sending the bill on to
another committee.
CHAIRMAN TAYLOR answered by saying the bill can be held if
committee members would like more time to address the issue.
MR. GERALD LUCKHAUPT, Legislative Council for the Division of Legal
Services, stated language was put in the bill specifying the actual
provision of the ordinance that specifies a penalty. The most
equitable way of applying sanctions seem to be to use criminal
sanctions rather than civil sanctions. To find an equitable system
throughout the state, municipalities may need a penalty provision
that applies penalties without a jail term. Ordinances can be
amended to provide a fine resulting in a lesser surcharge.
TAPE 00-03, SIDE B
MR. BRANDT-ERICKSEN commented that he sees this legislation as an
improvement over the current system, and more coordination between
local legislation, practices and enforcement may be the most
effective solution.
SENATOR TORGERSON moved HB 43 from committee with individual
recommendations and its accompanying fiscal note. Without
objection, HB 43 moved from committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|