Legislature(2021 - 2022)SENATE FINANCE 532
01/31/2022 01:00 PM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB41 | |
| HB85 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 85 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 41(FIN)
"An Act relating to management of enhanced stocks of
shellfish; authorizing certain nonprofit organizations
to engage in shellfish enhancement projects; relating
to application fees for salmon hatchery permits and
shellfish enhancement project permits; relating to the
marketing of aquatic farm products by the Alaska
Seafood Marketing Institute; and providing for an
effective date."
1:18:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAN ORTIZ, SPONSOR, reintroduced the bill.
He stated that the legislation was a shellfish enhancement
bill. He remarked that mariculture was an opportunity to
expand Alaskas fishing industry economy. He stated that
certain things must be put in place in order to expedite
the mariculture industry. He explained that the bill
allowed qualified nonprofits to pursue enhancements and/or
restoration projects involving shellfish species including
red and blue king crab; sea cucumber; abalone; and razor
clams. He stated that the bill created a regulatory
framework in which the Department of Fish and Game (DFG)
could manage shellfish enhancement projects.
1:20:51 PM
Senator Olson wondered whether there was opposition to the
bill.
Representative Ortiz replied that there were some
longstanding critics over the years, and stated that there
were some recent emails from some folks in the state. He
felt that the concerns had been previously addressed in the
legislation.
Senator Olson wondered whether there were subsistence
groups opposed to the bill.
Representative Ortiz replied that he was not aware of any
subsistence groups opposed to the bill.
Co-Chair Stedman asked that DFG present their position on
the bill.
1:21:59 PM
SAM RABUNG, DIRECTOR OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES, DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME, JUNEAU (via teleconference), had not heard
from the governor about the position on the bill. He
remarked that the governors mariculture task force had
identified the issue as one of its top five priorities.
Senator Wielechowski wondered whether any DFG scientists or
biologists were opposed to the legislation.
Mr. Rabung replied that scientists and biologists had
opinions, and there were some concerns about wild organisms
to ensure that there were safe measures. He felt that there
were safeguards to address those concerns.
Senator Wielechowski asked for documentation in writing of
opposition from the scientists and biologists.
Mr. Rabung replied that there was nothing in writing, but
there were continual and constant conversations. He
stressed that there were efforts to take into account all
concerns, which were built into the permitting process. He
stated that, in the long run, more permits were declined
than were approved.
1:25:48 PM
Senator Wielechowski wondered whether the department could
make the scientists available to the legislature.
Mr. Rabung stated that he did not have concerns about
commercial fishing staff available for questions.
Senator Olson wondered whether the discussion was ongoing
discussions or outright opposition.
Mr. Rabung replied that it was an ongoing discussion, and
the discussions would continue about permitting.
Senator Wielechowski queried the definition of traditional
fisheries.
Mr. Rabung replied that the enhancement projects were
intended to benefit existing common property fisheries. The
intention was for them to be harvested in already existing
fisheries.
Senator Wielechowski queried the definition of already
existing fisheries.
Mr. Rabung replied that enhancement projects would have the
resultant organisms from an existing fishery.
1:29:40 PM
AT EASE
1:30:23 PM
RECONVENED
1:30:33 PM
Senator Wielechowski wondered whether there was funding for
the bill.
Co-Chair Bishop replied that he would cover the fiscal note
later in the meeting, but stated that each fiscal note were
zero.
Senator Wielechowski wondered how the administration
intended to fund the bill with zero fiscal notes.
Co-Chair Bishop stated that the back up related to the
fiscal notes would answer the question.
1:31:19 PM
AT EASE
1:31:26 PM
RECONVENED
1:31:34 PM
Co-Chair Bishop highlighted the fiscal notes.
Senator Wilson remarked that the difference with the
committee substitutes was the removal of purview of the
Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI).
Co-Chair Bishop wondered whether Senator Wilson wanted to
address the remaining fiscal notes.
Senator Wilson replied that he would not, but merely want
to point to the change that was not included in the backup
for the fiscal notes.
1:33:11 PM
AT EASE
1:33:35 PM
RECONVENED
1:34:05 PM
Co-Chair Bishop continued to address the fiscal notes.
Senator Wilson MOVED to REPORT SCS CSHB 41(FIN) from
committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
SCS CSHB 41(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with two "do
pass" recommendations, and three "no recommendation"
recommendations and with a new zero fiscal note from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development,
new zero fiscal note from Department of Fish and Game, new
indeterminate fiscal note from Department of Fish and Game,
new indeterminate fiscal note from the Office of the
Governor, and new indeterminate fiscal note from the
Department of Revenue.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 41 Public Testimony Hillstrand OPPOSE .pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 41 |
| HB 41 Work Draft ver. G 5.13.2021.pdf |
SFIN 5/17/2021 9:00:00 AM SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 41 |
| HB 41 Explanation of Changes ver I to G 5.13.2021.pdf |
SFIN 5/17/2021 9:00:00 AM SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 41 |
| HB 41 Letters of Support as of 04.26.2021.pdf |
SFIN 5/14/2021 1:00:00 PM SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM SRES 5/12/2021 3:30:00 PM |
HB 41 |
| HB 41 Legal Memo Thompson 042221.pdf |
HFIN 4/26/2021 1:30:00 PM SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 41 |
| HB 85 Letters of Support 04.21.2021.pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 85 |
| HB 85 Sectional Analysis ver. W 01.21.2022.pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 85 |
| HB 85 Summary of Changes version B to version W 01.21.2022.pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 85 |
| HB 85 Sponsor Statement 03.16.2021.pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 85 |
| HB 41 Public Testimony Koeneman.pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 41 |
| HB 85 Response to Questions in Senate Finance 02.16.2022_.pdf |
SFIN 1/31/2022 1:00:00 PM |
HB 85 |