Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
05/04/2006 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB307 | |
| HB29 | |
| HB446 | |
| HB326 | |
| HB57 | |
| HB419 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| = | HB 307 | ||
| + | HB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 446 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 326 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 41 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 419 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 41(JUD)
"An Act relating to minimum periods of imprisonment for the
crime of assault in the fourth degree committed on school
grounds, on a school bus, at a school-sponsored event, or
at certain school district administration offices."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
REPRESENTATIVE BOB LYNN, the bill's sponsor, informed the
Committee that this bill had passed the House of Representatives
with a unanimous vote of the members present. He supported the
title change adopted by the Senate Judiciary Committee which
expanded the scope of an assault against a person to include an
assault occurring "on school grounds, on a school bus", and "at
a school sponsored event".
Representative Lynn pointed out that the bill would also require
a person convicted of a misdemeanor assault occurring at the
aforementioned locations to receive a mandatory minimum sentence
of 60 days. This bill would complement HB 88-CRIM LAW: MINORS,
SCHOOLS, DRUGS, SENTENCES, which was recently signed into law by
Governor Frank Murkowski. This bill would address misdemeanor
assaults, while HB 88 would address felony assaults on school
employees made with a deadly weapon.
Representative Lynn contended that the mandatory 60-day sentence
specified in this bill was an "appropriate" sentence. The
message must be sent that assaults on school grounds would not
be tolerated.
Representative Lynn disclosed that, being a retired public
school teacher; he personally understood "how dangerous working
on school premises could sometimes be". He noted that
representatives from the Department of Law, the Anchorage School
District, and the Alaska Association of School Boards, which is
on record in support of the bill, were available to answer
questions. He urged the Committee to advance the bill.
AT EASE: 9:46:23 AM / 9:46:35 AM
Co-Chair Green appreciated the work conducted on this bill. She
directed members' attention to a Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman
newspaper article titled "Police: Student urged into fight by
mother" [copy on file] about a Wasilla middle student who was
urged by her mother and another adult to assault another
student. The school district found they could not take action
against the adults for their involvement. She mentioned that
Senator Ralph Seekins has also recognized the validity in
addressing such a situation. Passage of this legislation would
delight school districts for it would provide them the ability
to adequately address assault situations in the future.
Senator Stedman asked whether the bill's language might subject
junior high or high school boys who might "get a little rough
with each other" when settling issues to 60 days in jail, were
such action to occur on school grounds.
NANCY MANLEY, Staff to Representative Lynn, deferred to the
Department of Law.
ANNE CARPENETI, Assistant Attorney General, Legal Services
Section-Juneau, Criminal Division, Department of Law, stated
that the situation "would depend on the circumstances". Students
fighting at a school-sponsored event would be subject to this
provision if "we could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they
were assaulting each other".
Senator Stedman questioned the "leeway" a judge might have in
dealing with these situations. "More often than we'd like", the
reality is that such behavior does occur with young adults.
Ms. Carpeneti understood the Senator's concern, as she recalled
from her high school experience that "kids did push each other
around". However, "it would be unlikely" under those
circumstances that an assault charge would be issued "unless the
fight was very serious".
Ms. Carpeneti clarified, that, were there cause to prosecute,
youth under the age of 18 would be prosecuted under juvenile
law. This provisions in this bill would apply to people 18 years
of age or older.
Co-Chair Green pointed out that internal school discipline
policies involving the principal, the student's parents, and the
school's disciplinary committee would first address an in-school
event.
Ms. Carpeneti anticipated that juveniles would be involved in
"the vast majority" of these situations. This legislation would
not be applicable in those cases.
Senator Bunde noted that a school confrontation that "escalated
to a really extreme situation" could be charged as an assault
under existing criminal law. To that point, he asked whether
this bill would impact existing assault laws.
Ms. Carpeneti stated this legislation would not affect existing
law. "There is already an aggravating factor for this kind of
conduct on school grounds that applied to all felony assaults
against a person".
Senator Bunde asked whether this bill would "increase that
punishment" in the case of "a student upon student assault".
Ms. Carpeneti expressed that this legislation would not affect
juveniles; it would not apply to people under the age of 18.
Senator Bunde shared "a very unfortunate event" in which a
parent attending their child's hockey game in Anchorage
assaulted a juvenile referee. He asked whether this legislation
would be applicable to such a situation were it a school-
sponsored event.
Ms. Carpeneti affirmed it would. "It would apply to the adult".
Co-Chair Green referred to language in Section 1(d)(1) and (2)
of the bill, beginning on page 1 line 6 through page 2 line 7,
which specified this legislation would be applicable to a person
"who knowingly directed the conduct constituting the offense at
a uniformed or otherwise clearly identified peace officer, fire
fighter, correctional employee", emergency medical technician,
paramedic, ambulance attendant, or other emergency responder who
was engaged in the performance of official duties at the time of
the assault or person on school grounds or at a school sponsored
event.
Ms. Carpeneti affirmed.
Co-Chair Green continued that, rather than the target of the
bill to be two kids fighting on a school playground, the focus
of the bill would be to provide legal recourse for school
officials in such cases as that detailed in the aforementioned
newspaper article about the adult who "spurred the child on" to
fight. The school district was frustrated when it found it had
no legal recourse against the adult. She apologized, had her
earlier remarks misled the discussion.
Co-Chair Wilken moved to report the bill from Committee with
individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal notes.
There being no objection, SCS CS HB 41(FIN) was REPORTED from
Committee with three previous zero fiscal notes: fiscal note #6
dated January 28, 2006 from the Department of Administration;
fiscal note #7 dated January 30, 2006 from the Department of
Law; and fiscal note #8 dated January 30, 2006 from the
Department of Public Safety.
AT EASE 9:54:39 AM / 9:58:27 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|