Legislature(2013 - 2014)BUTROVICH 205
02/21/2013 03:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation: Local Government by the Alaska Municipal League | |
| HB40 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | HB 40 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 40-MUNICIPAL TAX EXEMPTION: FARM STRUCTURES
3:51:03 PM
CHAIR MICCICHE announced HB 40 to be up for consideration [CSHB
40(CRA) was before the committee].
3:51:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES, sponsor of HB 40, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, said this measure is a farm food
storage building tax exemption. HB 40 points to the fact that
agriculture remains important to Alaska and its purpose is to
strengthen a small but important section of Alaska's economy.
She said Greg Wolf with the World Trade Center commented in the
Economic Development Committee last week about how Alaska
compares economically to other states. He said two factors cause
us to lag: agriculture and manufacturing.
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES said back in the 1950s more than 50
percent of the food consumed by Alaskans was from Alaska and now
it's less than 5 percent. HB 40 would allow, not mandate, local
municipalities to exempt specific food storage and production
buildings for those who derive at least 10 percent of their
income from farming activities. She hoped that reducing the tax
on certain buildings would encourage food storage and production
without diminishing a significant tax percentage for the
municipalities, which would help farmers. But it will also
increase access to locally grown food for Alaskans for a longer
period of time. She said bringing food up on a barge can take
seven to nine days and when food is grown locally it can be on
the shelf within a day or two.
3:54:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES said she has a lot of farmers in her
district and they were turning under crops and dumping produce
because it didn't make financial sense to store it because of
the tax they pay on the buildings. She sought input from
municipalities around the state who had good ideas which were
incorporated into the bill. The 10 percent income requirement
was to prevent someone who is just doing gardening as a hobby
from getting the credit.
Initially, she considered a building that would have 50 percent
farming use and decided that would be too hard on the local
municipalities. They would have to get out a measuring tape to
figure out if it's 50 percent, but it would also apply to a lot
more buildings and the fiscal impact would be harder on those
local municipalities. So, they tightened it up in that the
structure must be used exclusively for farming, which must
include the food storage, processing or growing and not storing
a sail boat.
3:56:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES said Bethel has no tax and it wouldn't
apply in the Delta area that is unorganized, but it could apply
to a few greenhouses in Juneau.
3:57:17 PM
GINGER BLAISDELL, staff to Representative Hughes, sponsor of HB
40, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, added the
Fairbanks assessor said the tax would be non-eventful. The Kenai
and Homer assessors said their farming activity is done in hoop
houses made of large PVC arched pipe with plastic over it, but
because they are not architecturally attached to the ground they
aren't considered a building structure. Kodiak also used hoop
houses; the only place that gave her a specific number for a
possible tax exemption was the MatSu Borough and he was trying
to count how many houses would be 50 percent food storage or
production and came up with over $3 million in tax. Once they
changed it to be exclusively for food storage or production, he
felt that that figure would be significantly reduced, but he
would have to look at some of the buildings again.
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES said Kenai came up with a figure of
$45,000.
MS. BLAISDELL added the whole borough, including Homer and
Soldotna, would be a total of $75,000.
CHAIR MICCICHE said he thought it was a good bill and asked for
questions.
3:59:10 PM
SENATOR BISHOP agreed with Senator Micciche.
4:00:05 PM
CHAIR MICCICHE said he thought just one part of the bill that
talked about home kitchens might be awkward.
MS. BLAISDELL said she talked to a couple of assessors who had
individuals who might be picking their own raspberries and
selling them at a farmers market, and because their kitchen is
part of a household structure and not solely for the purpose of
a farming activity, it would not qualify for an exemption.
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES said she could remove the word "likely" to
make language clearer.
CHAIR MICCICHE said he thought that would be the only thing that
might concern assessors.
4:01:52 PM
SENATOR EGAN asked if this language applied to the committee
substitute (CS).
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES answered yes.
4:02:26 PM
CHAIR MICCICHE clarified that the CS doesn't mention kitchens at
all, so she would be free to remove the word "likely".
REPRESENTATIVE HUGHES answered yes.
4:02:48 PM
STEVE VAN SANT, State Assessor, Department of Commerce,
Community and Economic Development (DCCED), Anchorage, Alaska,
said he was available to answer questions on HB 40.
CHAIR MICCICHE said he would leave public testimony open and
bring the bill up next Thursday.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Local Government 101 - Alaska Municipal League.pdf |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
|
| Local Government 101 - Additional documentation distributed by AML at the 2-21 meeting.PDF |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
|
| CSHB 40 CRA.pdf |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB 40 Sponsor Statement (S)CRA 13Feb13.doc |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB 40-1-2-020113-CED-N.pdf |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB 40 side by side - original bill to CS (S)CRA 13Feb13.docx |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB 40 - letter from Alaska Municipal League.pdf |
SCRA 2/21/2013 3:30:00 PM |
HB 40 |