Legislature(2009 - 2010)
04/18/2010 05:16 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB280 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 36(FIN) am
"An Act relating to ballot initiative proposal
applications, to ballot initiatives and to those who
file or organize for the purpose of filing a ballot
initiative proposal, and to election pamphlet
information relating to certain propositions."
5:53:46 PM
SONIA CHRISTIANSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE KYLE JOHANSEN
explained that HB 36 is an attempt to bring additional
information to the public prior to elections. She explained
that HB 36 has provisions that require early financial
disclosure for ballot measure campaigns. She stated that HB
36 delays the disclosure deadline requiring financial
disclosures throughout the signature gathering portion of
ballot measure campaigns. Currently, no disclosure exists
for the process. Up to one year can pass before financial
disclosures are required for ballot measure campaigns. She
stated that the legislation also requires public hearings
in four judicial districts of the state, with two judicial
districts moderated by the lieutenant governor, which
brings the initiatives closer to the people and allows
Alaskans to meet with the sponsors and the opposition to
ask questions and voice opinions.
Ms. Christianson continued that HB 36 requires a
legislative hearing allowing affected state agencies to
discuss a ballot measure with the legislature. She
explained that the bill requires signature gatherers to
carry a full copy of the initiative.
5:56:27 PM
Senator Olson asked if the administration was in favor of
the changes.
CRAIG CAMPBELL, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR stated that his office
is responsible for initiatives in the state from the
administration perspective and his office supports HB 36.
Senator Olson noted the initiative process in the past ten
years has become more involved. He asked if HB 36 would
further complicate the process.
Lt. Governor Campbell responded that the sponsor's
intention is to create a more transparent process allowing
for better understanding of the initiatives. He stated that
his office supports the public hearing process. He believed
that the legislation would allow the citizens of Alaska to
have greater understanding and vetting of the initiatives.
Senator Thomas asked about the concept of not allowing the
use of per signature commission. Ms. Christianson responded
that the mentioned provision was removed from the bill on
the House floor and is no longer applicable.
5:59:04 PM
Senator Huggins asked how the provisions would have
affected the Pebble Initiative. Ms. Christianson responded
that the provisions in HB 36 would have required disclosure
earlier in the process. Technically, if money is not
transferred in the signature gathering phase to the
campaign phase, there is no disclosure. The legislation
would have allowed the public to witness the signature
gathering phase which is an essential part of the
initiative.
Co-Chair Stedman mentioned one fiscal note from the
Department of Administration for $60,200 in general funds
for one permanent full time position and two zero fiscal
notes from the Office of the Governor on behalf of the
Lieutenant Governor's office and the Division of Elections.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to report SCS CS SS HB 36 out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CS SS HB 36 was REPORTED out of Committee with no
recommendation and with two previously published zero
notes: FN 2 (GOV), FN 3 (GOV) and one previously published
fiscal impact note: FN 5 (ADM).
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|